S.Amdt. 3343Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)
S.Amdt. 3343
Sponsored by
Sen. Joe Manchin III (D-WV)
Submitted February 29, 2016
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
February 29, 2016
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
February 29, 2016
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
February 29, 2016
Text
Submitted
SA 3343. Mr. MANCHIN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 524, to authorize the Attorney General to award grants to address the national epidemics of prescription opioid abuse and heroin use; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end, add the following: SEC. 705. APPROVAL OF OPIOID DRUGS. (a) In General.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, the Commissioner of Food and Drugs (referred to in this section as ``the Commissioner'') shall ensure that, with respect to each application for an opioid drug submitted under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355)-- (1) an advisory committee of the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research of the Food and Drug Administration evaluates the application and issues a recommendation regarding approval of such drug prior to a final decision to approve such drug; and (2) if a final decision to approve such drug is inconsistent with the recommendation under paragraph (1), such final decision shall be made by the Commissioner and shall not be delegated. (b) Reports to Congress.--If the advisory committee recommends under subsection (a)(1) that the Commissioner not approve an opioid drug under section 505 of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (21 U.S.C. 355), and the Commissioner approves that drug under subsection (a)(2), the Commissioner shall-- (1) submit a report to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate and the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, and to any member of Congress that requests the report, that includes-- (A) medical and scientific evidence regarding patient safety that clearly supports the Commissioner's decision to approve the opioid drug against the recommendation of the advisory committee; and (B) a disclosure of any potential conflicts of interest that may exist regarding any official of the Food and Drug Administration who was involved in the decision to approve the drug prior to the Commissioner's final decision under subsection (a)(2); and (2) at the request of the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions of the Senate or the Committee on Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives, testify before that committee regarding the Commissioner's decision to approve the opioid drug against the recommendation of the advisory committee. (c) Prohibition on Marketing.--A drug described in subsection (b) shall not be introduced or delivered for introduction into interstate commerce until the report described in subsection (b)(1) has been submitted to Congress. ______