S.Amdt. 4282Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)
S.Amdt. 4282
Sponsored by
Sen. Mazie K. Hirono (D-HI)
Submitted May 26, 2016
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
May 26, 2016
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
May 26, 2016
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
May 26, 2016
Text
Submitted
SA 4282. Ms. HIRONO submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by her to the bill S. 2943, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2017 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle A of title XI, add the following: SEC. 1114. SENSE OF CONGRESS ON BUSINESS CASES ANALYSES FOR DECISIONS AFFECTING THE WORKFORCE AND MODIFYING LOCATIONS OF WHERE WORK WILL BE EXECUTED OR COMPLETED. (a) Sense of Congress.--It is the sense of Congress that-- (1) in a budget constrained environment, the military departments and Defense Agencies must utilize all available tools to make informed, supportable decisions in moving workforce and workload from one location or entity to another; (2) such tools should include a properly supported and documented business case analysis (BCA); (3) several military departments and Defense Agencies have fallen short of proper analysis and support with respect to decision described in paragraph (1) in recent months; (4) in one such case-- (A) the Air Force relied exclusively on a rough order economic analysis on an engine source of repair as justification for moving nearly $40,000,000 per year of workload; and (B) before reversing its decision, the Air Force had only planned to accomplish business case analyses to shift work after award of the solicitation; (5) in another case-- (A) the Defense Health Agency announced that it would be closing the Pacific Joint Information Technology Center (PJITC), with an annual operation and maintenance cost of $5,800,000, without supporting documentation or analysis; (B) the center performs Health Information Technology (HIT) research and innovation and serves as a test center for joint concept technology development (JCTD) prototyping for the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs for information technology products and services; (C) if the center is closed, ongoing interoperability projects between the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs will lose a critical health information technology research hub which was responsible for the Joint Legacy Viewer (JLV) which, in turn, is deployed throughout the Department of Defense and the Department of Veterans Affairs and meets required interoperability standards; (D) Defense Health Agency officials contend that the quality of the work completed at the center is not at issue, and they plan to continue the work at a different facility which is not a joint research facility and does not have the capability or capacity to continue the work of the center; (6) before a military department or Defense Agency embarks on a workforce decision of workload in excess of $3,000,000 per year, the Department of Defense needs to understand the possible costs, benefits, risks, and impacts to the small business goals, small and disadvantaged contracting agreements, and other sensitivities of the Department associated with such a decision; (7) the military departments and Defense Agencies should perform a business case analysis, as part of any workforce decision described in paragraph (6); (8) any such business case analysis for a workforce decision having an annual estimated cost of $5,000,0000 or more should be reviewed and approved by the Under Secretary of Defense for Acquisition, Technology, and Logistics, and the Under Secretary should provide such business case analysis to the congressional defense committees at least 30 days before taking any action to effect a shift in the workload concerned; (9) the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Logistics, Materiel, and Readiness, working with the Cost Analysis Program Evaluation office, should develop minimum standards and criteria for business case analyses covered by this section and a process for the review and transparency of such business case analyses; and (10) the Assistant Secretary should submit to the congressional defense committees, by not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report on the plan of the Assistant Secretary plan to implement the standards and criteria described in paragraph (9). (b) Business Case Analysis Defined.--In this section, the term ``business case analysis'' means a structured methodology and decision support document that aids decision making by identifying and comparing alternatives by examining the mission and business impacts (both financial and non- financial), risks, and sensitivities. ______