S.Amdt. 4704Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 4704
Sponsored by
Sen. Deb Fischer (R-NE)
Submitted June 15, 2016
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 15, 2016
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
June 15, 2016
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
June 15, 2016
Text
Submitted
SA 4704. Mrs. FISCHER (for herself and Mr. Grassley) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 4685 proposed by Mr. McConnell (for Mr. Shelby (for himself and Ms. Mikulski)) to the bill H.R. 2578, making appropriations for the Departments of Commerce and Justice, Science, and Related Agencies for the fiscal year ending September 30, 2016, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the appropriate place in title II, insert the following: Sec. __. None of the funds appropriated or otherwise made available for the immediate Office of the Deputy Attorney General under the heading ``salaries and expenses'' under the heading ``General Administration'' under this title may be obligated or expended until the date on which the Deputy Attorney General submits to Congress a plan for the Department of Justice to monitor the effects of the licensing of the cultivation, processing, distribution, and retail sale of marijuana or marijuana products under State law on the marijuana enforcement policies of the Federal Government, including preventing the distribution of marijuana to minors, preventing the diversion of marijuana to States where it remains illegal under State law, and preventing the exacerbation of public health consequences associated with marijuana use, in accordance with the 2013 marijuana enforcement policy guidance of the Department of Justice, which shall include-- (1) a description of the various data the Deputy Attorney General will use to monitor such effects and the limitations of this data; (2) a description of how the Deputy Attorney General will use the information sources in its monitoring efforts to help inform decisions on whether States are effectively protecting the marijuana enforcement priorities of the Federal Government, including the use, if any, of pre-established metrics; and (3) a description of how the Deputy Attorney General will decide whether a State's failure to effectively protect these priorities necessitates Federal action to challenge a State's regulatory system. ______