S.Amdt. 5039Senate114th Congress (2015-2017)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 5039
Sponsored by
Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA)
Submitted September 12, 2016
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
September 12, 2016
View full timeline
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
September 12, 2016
Floor
Senate amendment submitted
September 12, 2016
Text
Submitted
SA 5039. Mrs. ERNST (for herself and Mr. Grassley) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 4979 proposed by Mr. McConnell (for Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mrs. Boxer)) to the bill S. 2848, to provide for the conservation and development of water and related resources, to authorize the Secretary of the Army to construct various projects for improvements to rivers and harbors of the United States, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title VI, add the following: SEC. 60__. GAO STUDY ON CORPS OF ENGINEERS METHODOLOGY AND PERFORMANCE METRICS. (a) In General.--Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the Committee on Environment and Public Works of the Senate and the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure of the House of Representatives a study of the methodologies and performance metrics used by the Corps of Engineers to calculate benefit-cost ratios and evaluate construction projects. (b) Considerations.--The study under subsection (a) shall address-- (1) whether and to what extent the current methodologies and performance metrics place small and rural geographic areas at a competitive disadvantage; (2) whether the value of property for which damage would be prevented as a result of a flood risk management project is the best measurement for the primary input in benefit-cost calculations for flood risk management projects; (3) any recommendations for approaches to modify the metrics used to improve benefit-cost ratio results for small and rural geographic areas; and (4) whether a reevaluation of existing approaches and the primary criteria used to calculate the economic benefits of a Corps of Engineers construction project could provide greater construction project completion results for small and rural geographic areas without putting a strain on the budget of the Corps of Engineers. ______