S.Amdt. 1200Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 1200
Sponsored by
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-OR)
Submitted October 18, 2017
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
October 18, 2017
Text
Submitted
SA 1200. Mr. WYDEN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 1116 proposed by Mr. Enzi to the concurrent resolution H. Con. Res. 71, establishing the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2018 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2019 through 2027; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title IV, add the following: SEC. 4__. POINT OF ORDER AGAINST TAX REFORM LEGISLATION THAT IS LESS PROGRESSIVE THAN CURRENT LAW. (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment between the Houses, or conference report that amends the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 and results in a tax code that is less progressive than current law. (b) Determination of Whether Code Is Less Progressive.--For purposes of this section, a measure described in subsection (a) results in a tax code that is less progressive than current law if, after the measure takes effect-- (1) the percentage increase in after-tax income for tax returns in higher income groups, including the top 10 percent, top 5 percent, top 1 percent, and top 0.1 percent, is greater than the percentage increase in after-tax income for tax returns in lower income groups; or (2) the percentage decrease in after-tax income for tax returns in higher income groups, including the top 10 percent, top 5 percent, top 1 percent, and top 0.1 percent, is less than the percentage decrease in after-tax income for tax returns in lower income groups. The determinations made under paragraph (1) and (2) shall be based on distribution tables produced by the Joint Committee on Taxation. (c) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (a) may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three- fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under subsection (a). ______