S.Amdt. 2131Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)
S.Amdt. 2131
Sponsored by
Sen. Jack Reed (D-RI)
Submitted March 7, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
March 7, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2131. Mr. REED (for himself and Mr. Blumenthal) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill S. 2155, to promote economic growth, provide tailored regulatory relief, and enhance consumer protections, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 29, line 3, insert ``, which shall include a review of any Federal fine or penalty paid during the preceding 24- month period and whether any violation or settlement related to an alleged violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) or section 987 of title 10, United States Code, could have been avoided'' after ``appropriate''. On page 39, line 3, insert ``, which shall include a review of any Federal fine or penalty paid during the preceding 24- month period and whether any violation or settlement related to an alleged violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) or section 987 of title 10, United States Code, could have been avoided'' after ``appropriate''. On page 40, line 6, insert ``, including based on a review of any Federal fine or penalty paid during the preceding 24- month period and whether any violation or settlement related to an alleged violation of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) or section 987 of title 10, United States Code, could have been avoided'' after ``eligible''. On page 44, line 18, insert ``, which may include a determination by the Board that the bank holding company or savings and loan holding company, as applicable, has an unacceptable history of repeatedly paying Federal fines or penalties or has an unacceptable history of violating or settling alleged violations of the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C. 3901 et seq.) or section 987 of title 10, United States Code, that could have been avoided'' after ``purposes''. ______