S.Amdt. 2386Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2386
Sponsored by
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
Submitted June 7, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 7, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2386. Mr. HEINRICH (for himself and Mr. Udall) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2282 submitted by Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. McCain) and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle B of title XXXI, add the following: SEC. 3119. PLUTONIUM PIT PRODUCTION. (a) In General.--The Administrator for Nuclear Security shall continue the design of the facility described in subsection (b) to 90 percent design completion with an independent cost estimate described in subsection (c) before approval of a combined critical decision-2 and critical decision-3 under Department of Energy Order 413.3B (relating to program management and project management for the acquisition of capital assets), or a successor order, in order to ensure the suitability of the facility for plutonium pit production. (b) Facility Described.--The facility described in this subsection is a plutonium pit production facility-- (1) authorized pursuant to section 3114(c)(2) of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2013 (50 U.S.C. 2535 note); (2) described in the document entitled the ``Engineering Assessment Report--Pu Pit Production Engineering Assessment'', dated April 13, 2018; and (3) capable of producing an additional 31 to 80 pits annually, as required by section 4219 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2538a). (c) Independent Cost Estimates Described.--An independent cost estimate described in this subsection shall include an evaluation of the suitability of the facility described in subsection (b) for plutonium pit production, including an evaluation of the following: (1) Life cycle costs. (2) Program acquisition unit costs for pit production. (3) Average program unit costs for pit production. (4) The costs of start up to full operations capable of producing 31 to 80 pits annually, as required by section 4219 of the Atomic Energy Defense Act (50 U.S.C. 2538a). (5) A quantitative risk assessment of pit production. (d) Report Required.--Combined critical decision-2 and critical decision-3 for the facility described in subsection (b) may not commence until the date that is 30 days after the Administrator submits to the congressional defense committees a report on the independent cost estimate conducted under subsection (c). (e) Plan for Oversight of Pit Production.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Nuclear Weapons Council established under section 179 of title 10, United States Code, shall-- (A) establish a plan for oversight of current and future plutonium pit production capabilities to meet the requirements of the Department of Defense, including the development of a future plutonium pit production facility; and (B) submit the plan to the congressional defense committees. (2) Signatures.--The plan required by paragraph (1) shall be signed by all members of the Nuclear Weapons Council. (f) Briefing on Plutonium Strategy.--Not later than March 1, 2019, the Chairman of the Nuclear Weapons Council and the Administrator for Nuclear Security shall jointly provide to the Committees on Armed Services of the Senate and the House of Representatives, and to any other congressional defense committee upon request, a briefing detailing the implementation plan for the plutonium strategy of the National Nuclear Security Administration, including milestones, accountable personnel for such milestones, and mechanisms for ensuring transparency into the progress of the strategy for the Department of Defense and the congressional defense committees. ______