S.Amdt. 2685Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2685
Sponsored by
Sen. Jeanne Shaheen (D-NH)
Submitted June 11, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 11, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2685. Mrs. SHAHEEN submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2282 submitted by Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. McCain) and intended to be proposed to the bill H.R. 5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At appropriate place in title XVI, insert the following: SEC. ___. ASSESSMENT BY COMPTROLLER GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMOUNT AND DISTRIBUTION OF INTELLIGENCE, SURVEILLANCE, AND RECONNAISSANCE RESOURCES. (a) Assessment.--The Comptroller General of the United States shall, in consultation with the Secretary of Defense, the Director of National Intelligence, the secretaries of the military departments, the commanders of the relevant combatant support agencies, and the commanders of the combatant commands, carry out an assessment of the amount and distribution of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources across the intelligence community and the Armed Forces. (b) Report.-- (1) In general.--Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this act, the Comptroller General shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report on the assessment required by subsection (a). (2) Contents.--The report required by paragraph (1) shall include the following: (A) An assessment of the amount and distribution of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources across the intelligence community and the Armed Forces, specifically-- (i) the balance of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources being used to support the demands of policymakers (via the intelligence community) relative to the distribution of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance being used to support the demands of the commanders of the combatant commands (via the military services); (ii) whether the distribution of such resources is optimally aligned with the National Security Strategy; and (iii) where risks are being assumed based on balancing the distribution of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources. (B) An assessment of the distribution of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources among the various combatant commands, including-- (i) whether the resources are optimally aligned with the 2018 National Defense Strategy; and (ii) where risks are being assumed based on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resource levels. (C) An assessment of the distribution of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources within each combatant command, including-- (i) the balance between intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources being used to support ongoing operations versus intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources being used to support contingency operations; and (ii) whether the resources are optimally aligned with the 2018 National Defense Strategy; and (iii) where risks are being assumed based on intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resource levels. (D) An assessment of the effect of increasing the overall level of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources on achieving national security objectives of the United States, as well as the effect of increasing the level of intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources for the highest priority requirements for the Director of National Intelligence and commanders of the combatant commands. (E) Recommendations for maximizing any additional intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance resources to support national security objectives of the United States, particularly for the highest priority requirements for the Director and the commanders of the combatant commands, as well as how most effectively to buy-down significant strategic risks. (3) Form.--The report submitted under paragraph (1) shall include an unclassified summary, but may otherwise be classified, as appropriate. (c) Rule of Construction.--Nothing in this section shall be construed to waive the requirements or applicability of section 348 of the Intelligence Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2010 (50 U.S.C. 3308). (d) Definitions.--In this section: (1) The term ``appropriate committees of Congress'' means-- (A) the Committee on Armed Services and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and (B) the Committee on Armed Services and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives. (2) The term ``intelligence community'' has the meaning given such term in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003). ______