S.Amdt. 2815Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2815
Sponsored by
Sen. Rob Portman (R-OH)
Submitted June 12, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 12, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2815. Mr. PORTMAN (for himself and Mr. Brown) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2282 proposed by Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. McCain) to the bill H.R. 5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle A of title XI, add the following: SEC. ___. REPORT ON SENIOR EXECUTIVE SERVICE MOBILITY IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY FIELDS. (a) Report Required.--The Secretary of Defense shall enter into an agreement with a Federally funded research and development center to submit to the congressional defense committees, not later than one year after the date of the enactment of this Act, a report on the effects of rotating members of the Senior Executive Service of the Department of Defense in science and technology fields. The report shall include interviews with current and former members of such the Senior Executive Service of the Department of Defense in science and technology and personnel managers in science and technology organizations. (b) Elements.--The report required under paragraph (1) shall include the following elements: (1) A description and comparison of policies of each of the military departments and the Office of the Secretary of Defense relating to positions in the Senior Executive Service in science and technology fields. (2) A discussion of the advantages and disadvantages of Senior Executive Service mobility and whether the policy should be different for positions in science and technology fields. (3) Identification of positions in the Senior Executive Service that may have been misclassified as technical positions. (4) An assessment of the extent to which mobility requirements of the Senior Executive Service are a factor in retirement or recruitment, and whether that differs for science and technology fields from other fields. (5) Such recommendations for legislative or administrative action as the Federally funded research and development center may have with respect to rotating members of the Senior Executive Service of the Department in science and technology fields. ______