S.Amdt. 2817Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2817
Sponsored by
Sen. Martin Heinrich (D-NM)
Submitted June 12, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 12, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 2817. Mr. HEINRICH submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2282 proposed by Mr. Inhofe (for himself and Mr. McCain) to the bill H.R. 5515, to authorize appropriations for fiscal year 2019 for military activities of the Department of Defense, for military construction, and for defense activities of the Department of Energy, to prescribe military personnel strengths for such fiscal year, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of part I of subtitle F of title V, add the following: SEC. 564. SENSE OF THE SENATE. (a) Findings.--The Senate finds the following: (1) The program of Federal impact aid was created by Congress in 1950 to provide local educational agencies with direct and flexible funding meant to replace property tax revenue lost due to the presence of tax-exempt Federal property, and since that time, impact aid funding has given local public schools the ability to provide quality public education to military connected students. (2) More than 1,200 local educational agencies receive funding through the impact aid program under title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.) (referred to in this section as ``impact aid''). (3) Impact aid funding is used as a tax replacement program that supports all students in the school district due to the presence of Federal tax-exempt land, such as military installations, Native American reservations, or national parks. (4) Congress designed impact aid funds to be intentionally flexible, and local educational agencies can use these funds to purchase classroom equipment, fund after-school programs and advanced placement classes, and provide additional resources for special education. (5) Turning impact aid into a voucher program would take away critical funding from public local educational agencies serving the majority of military connected students. (6) Using the impact aid program as a funding source to support misguided school privatization policies will do nothing to increase the education quality for the vast majority of students at schools that receive funding under the impact aid program (referred to in this section as ``federally impacted schools''). (7) Reducing impact aid funding for public schools places a great financial burden on the local community of federally impacted schools, and this is particularly unfair to these communities, as residents in many federally impacted school districts pay higher-than-average taxes because of the lack of taxable property or taxpayers in their communities. (8) School vouchers undermine public school systems, lack accountability, and fail to ensure that the civil rights of students are fully protected. (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that-- (1) because a majority of military connected students attend public schools, Congress should reaffirm its commitment to providing all military connected students with high-quality local public education; (2) Congress should reaffirm its commitment to maintaining the structure of the Federal impact aid program under title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (20 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), as in effect on the day before the date of enactment of this Act; and (3) Congress should reaffirm that the impact aid funding authorized under section 561 and section 562 is critical to ensuring public local educational agencies, whose tax base has been impacted by the Federal Government and who educate concentrations of military connected students, have adequate resources to educate federally connected students. ______