S.Amdt. 3175Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)
S.Amdt. 3175
Sponsored by
Sen. Michael F. Bennet (D-CO)
Submitted June 26, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 26, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 3175. Mr. BENNET submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the bill H.R. 2, to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of subtitle B of title VII, add the following: SEC. 72__. STUDY ON NATIONAL BENEFITS OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION PRACTICES. The Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990 is amended by inserting after section 1668 (7 U.S.C. 5921) the following: ``SEC. 1669. STUDY ON NATIONAL BENEFITS OF CARBON SEQUESTRATION PRACTICES. ``(a) Study.-- ``(1) In general.--Not later than 90 days after the date of enactment of the Agriculture Improvement Act of 2018, the Secretary of Agriculture shall offer to enter into a contract with the National Academy of Sciences to convene a committee of experts in natural sciences (referred to in this section as the `Committee') to conduct a study to quantify the benefits of land-sector carbon sequestration practices implemented in national forests, grasslands, parks, wetlands, and private voluntary conservation land. ``(2) Deadline.--The Committee shall convene not later than 30 days after the date on which the Secretary of Agriculture and the National Academy of Sciences enter into a contract under paragraph (1). ``(b) Report.--On completion of the study under subsection (a)(1), the Committee shall submit to the Secretary of Agriculture, the Committee on Agriculture of the House of Representatives, and the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry of the Senate an expert consensus report that-- ``(1) describes current scientific knowledge relating to the benefits of implementing land-sector carbon sequestration across the United States; and ``(2) quantifies, to the maximum extent practicable, the impact of land-sector carbon sequestration on carbon sequestration, net primary productivity, biodiversity, water quantity, and other ecosystem services.''. ______