S.Amdt. 3235Senate115th Congress (2017-2019)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 3235
Sponsored by
Sen. Steve Daines (R-MT)
Submitted June 27, 2018
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
June 27, 2018
Text
Submitted
SA 3235. Mr. DAINES submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 3224 proposed by Mr. Roberts (for himself and Ms. Stabenow) to the bill H.R. 2, to provide for the reform and continuation of agricultural and other programs of the Department of Agriculture through fiscal year 2023, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of part II of subtitle F of title VIII, add the following: SEC. 863_. COLLABORATIVE PROJECTS. (a) Definitions.--In this section: (1) Collaborative process.--The term ``collaborative process'' means the process described in section 603(b)(1)(C) of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6591b(b)(1)(C)). (2) Lead objector.--The term ``lead objector'', with respect to a filed objection that lists multiple individuals or entities, means, as applicable, the individual or entity-- (A) identified on the objection as the representative of all other objectors for the purposes of communication, written or otherwise, regarding the objection; or (B) designated under subsection (d)(1)(B)(ii). (3) Project.--The term ``project'' means any project carried out by the Chief of the Forest Service that is developed through a collaborative process, including-- (A) an authorized hazardous fuel reduction project under section 102 of the Healthy Forests Restoration Act of 2003 (16 U.S.C. 6512); and (B) the Collaborative Forest Landscape Restoration Program under section 4003(b) of the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009 (16 U.S.C. 7303(b)). (b) Civil Action.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, an individual or entity that files a predecisional administrative objection to a project, or any portion of a project, may only commence a civil action for review of the project, subject to subsection (d). (c) Treatment of Collaborative Members.--For purposes of a civil action for review of a project commenced under subsection (b), any individual or entity that is recognized by the Secretary as a member of the collaborative process for that project shall be-- (1) entitled to intervene, as of right, in any subsequent civil action; and (2) considered to be a full participant in any settlement negotiation regarding the project. (d) Administrative Remedies.-- (1) Meetings required.-- (A) In general.--Notwithstanding any other provision of law, subject to subparagraph (C), on request by the Secretary, an individual or entity or lead objector that files a predecisional administrative objection regarding a project, or any portion of a project, shall publicly meet with the Secretary to resolve the objection before filing a petition for review of the project with a court of competent jurisdiction. (B) Multiple objectors.-- (i) In general.--If multiple individuals or entities are listed on an objection, on request for a meeting under subparagraph (A), identification of the lead objector shall be provided to the Secretary. (ii) Designation of lead objector.--If identification of the lead objector is not provided under clause (i), the Secretary shall designate the lead objector. (C) Telephone conferences.--The Secretary may elect, on a limited, case-by-case basis, to hold a meeting under subparagraph (A) through a telephone conference call, if the Secretary determines an in-person meeting to be impracticable. (D) Public participation.--The Secretary shall provide to each individual or entity that is recognized by the Secretary as a member of the collaborative process-- (i) notice that a public meeting has been scheduled under subparagraph (A); and (ii) an opportunity to comment at that public meeting. (2) Authority to dismiss.--The Secretary shall dismiss any predecisional administrative objection if an objector or lead objector fails to appear for a meeting scheduled under paragraph (1)(A). (3) Treatment.--If an objection is dismissed under paragraph (2), each individual or entity that filed the objection shall be-- (A) considered to have failed to exhaust administrative remedies; and (B) ineligible to seek judicial review of the applicable project. ______