To create a point of order against legislation that would eliminate or reduce Federal funding to States under the Medicaid expansion.
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 83 proposed by Senator Sanders for Senator Menendez.(consideration: CR S249-251, S260; text: CR S250)
January 11, 2017
View full timeline
Senate amendment proposed (on the floor): Amendment SA 83 proposed by Senator Sanders for Senator Menendez.(consideration: CR S249-251, S260; text: CR S250)
January 11, 2017
Roll call votes on amendments in Senate: Motion to waive all applicable budgetary discipline with respect to amendment SA 83 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 50. Record Vote Number: 18.(consideration: CR S260)
January 11, 2017
Amendment SA 83 proposed by Senator Sanders for Senator Menendez. (consideration: CR S249-251, S260; text: CR S250) To create a point of order against legislation that would eliminate or reduce Federal funding to States under the Medicaid expansion.
January 11, 2017
Point of order that the amendment violates section 305(b)(2) of the CBA raised in Senate with respect to amendment SA 83.
January 11, 2017
Motion to waive all applicable budgetary discipline with respect to amendment SA 83 rejected in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 48 - 50. Record Vote Number: 18. (consideration: CR S260)
January 11, 2017
Amendment SA 83 ruled out of order by the chair.
January 11, 2017
Senate amendment submitted
January 10, 2017
Votes
1 roll call on this amendment
Text
Submitted
SA 83. Mr. MENENDEZ (for himself, Mr. Durbin, Ms. Hassan, Mr. Leahy, Mr. Heinrich, Mr. Franken, Mrs. Feinstein, Mr. Reed, Mrs. Murray, Mr. Carper, Mr. Blumenthal, Mr. Booker, Mr. Brown, Ms. Cantwell, Mr. Cardin, Mr. Coons, Ms. Hirono, Mr. Markey, Mr. Murphy, Mrs. Shaheen, Mr. Udall, Mrs. Gillibrand, Ms. Klobuchar, Mr. Wyden, and Ms. Stabenow) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 3, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2017 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2018 through 2026; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the end of title IV, add the following: SEC. 4__. POINT OF ORDER AGAINST ELIMINATING OR REDUCING FEDERAL FUNDING TO STATES UNDER THE MEDICAID EXPANSION. (a) Point of Order.--It shall not be in order in the Senate to consider any bill, joint resolution, motion, amendment, amendment between the Houses, or conference report that would eliminate or reduce funding to States available under law in effect on the date of the adoption of this section to provide comprehensive, affordable health care to low-income Americans by eliminating or reducing the availability of Federal financial assistance to States available under section 1905(y)(1) or 1905(z)(2) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396d(y)(1), 1396d(z)(2)) or other means, unless the Director of the Congressional Budget Office certifies that the legislation would not-- (1) increase the number of uninsured Americans; (2) decrease Medicaid enrollment in States that have opted to expand eligibility for medical assistance under that program for low-income, non-elderly individuals under the eligibility option established by the Affordable Care Act under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII)); (3) reduce the likelihood that any State that, as of the date of the adoption of this section, has not opted to expand Medicaid under the eligibility option established by the Affordable Care Act under section 1902(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)(10)(A)(i)(VIII)) would opt to use that eligibility option to expand eligibility for medical assistance under that program for low-income, non-elderly individuals; and (4) increase the State share of Medicaid spending under that eligibility option. (b) Waiver and Appeal.--Subsection (a) may be waived or suspended in the Senate only by an affirmative vote of three- fifths of the Members, duly chosen and sworn. An affirmative vote of three-fifths of the Members of the Senate, duly chosen and sworn, shall be required to sustain an appeal of the ruling of the Chair on a point of order raised under subsection (a). ______