S.Amdt. 2373Senate117th Congress (2021-2023)2nd degree
S.Amdt. 2373
Sponsored by
Sen. Tim Kaine (D-VA)
Submitted August 3, 2021
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
August 3, 2021
Text
Submitted
SA 2373. Mr. KAINE submitted an amendment intended to be proposed to amendment SA 2137 proposed by Mr. Schumer (for Ms. Sinema (for herself, Mr. Portman, Mr. Manchin, Mr. Cassidy, Mrs. Shaheen, Ms. Collins, Mr. Tester, Ms. Murkowski, Mr. Warner, and Mr. Romney)) to the bill H.R. 3684, to authorize funds for Federal-aid highways, highway safety programs, and transit programs, and for other purposes; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: On page 203, strike line 17 and insert the following: the project is located on a Federal-aid highway. ``(t) State of Good Repair.-- ``(1) In general.--Before the Secretary approves any project funded, in whole or in part, with funds apportioned pursuant to section 104(b) that will result in new through travel lanes for single occupancy vehicles, excluding auxiliary lanes and high occupancy vehicle toll lanes pursuant to section 166, the State or project sponsor shall-- ``(A) demonstrate progress in achieving a state of good repair as required by the State's asset management plan under section 119(e) of this title; ``(B) demonstrate that the project-- ``(i) supports the achievement of performance targets of the State established under section 150; and ``(ii) is more cost effective, as determined by benefit- cost analysis, than-- ``(I) an operational improvement to the facility or corridor; ``(II) the construction of a public transportation project eligible for assistance under chapter 53 of title 49; and ``(III) the construction of a non-single occupancy passenger vehicle project that improves freight movement; and ``(C) have a public plan for maintaining and operating the new asset while continuing progress of the State or project sponsor in achieving a state of good repair under subparagraph (A). ``(2) Benefit-cost analysis.--In carrying out paragraph (1)(B)(ii), the Secretary shall establish a process for analyzing the cost and benefits of projects under that paragraph, ensuring that-- ``(A) the benefit-cost analysis includes a calculation of all the benefits addressed in the performance measures established under section 150; ``(B) the benefit-cost analysis includes a consideration of the total maintenance cost of an asset over the lifecycle of the asset; and ``(C) the State demonstrates that any transportation demand modeling used to calculate the benefit-cost analysis is based on retrospective analysis of the accuracy of past forecasting and calibration to real-word conditions or has a documented record of accuracy. ``(3) Savings clause.--The provisions of this subsection shall not apply to any project that is fully funded in an adopted State transportation improvement program as of the date of enactment of this subsection.''. ______