S.Amdt. 343Senate117th Congress (2021-2023)
S.Amdt. 343
Sponsored by
Sen. John Thune (R-SD)
Submitted February 3, 2021
Legislative Activity
Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action
Floor
Latest Action
Senate amendment submitted
February 3, 2021
Text
Submitted
SA 343. Mr. THUNE (for himself, Mr. Barrasso, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Burr, Mrs. Capito, Mr. Cornyn, Mr. Crapo, Mr. Daines, Ms. Ernst, Mr. Inhofe, Mr. Hagerty, Mrs. Hyde-Smith, Mr. Marshall, Mr. Romney, Mr. Scott of Florida, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Tillis, Mr. Young, and Mr. Hoeven) submitted an amendment intended to be proposed by him to the concurrent resolution S. Con. Res. 5, setting forth the congressional budget for the United States Government for fiscal year 2021 and setting forth the appropriate budgetary levels for fiscal years 2022 through 2030; which was ordered to lie on the table; as follows: At the appropriate place, insert the following: SEC. ____. SENSE OF THE SENATE RELATING TO REJECTING EFFORTS TO PURSUE A ONE-SIZE-FITS-ALL GOVERNMENT RUN HEALTH CARE SYSTEM. (a) Findings.--Congress finds as follows: (1) Medicare for All, Medicare ``buy-in'', and the so- called ``public option'' are all one-size-fits-all government run health care systems. (2) Approaches such as Medicare for All, Medicare ``buy- in'', and the so-called ``public option'' would fail to protect the Medicare program under title XVIII of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395 et seq.) since, according to the Congressional Budget Office, the Medicare program will be officially bankrupt in 2024, at which time Medicare will no longer be able to pay full benefits to seniors and the disabled. (3) According to one leading economist, Medicare for All would increase costs to the Federal Government by an additional $38,000,000,000,000 and require significant tax increases on hard-working, middle-class Americans in order to fund this massive new program spending. (4) 60 percent of women in the United States under the age of 65 are covered by health insurance obtained on the job, and would be unfairly targeted by these government-centered approaches. (5) Under a one-size-fits-all government run health care system-- (A) more than 180,000,000 Americans covered by health insurance obtained on the job would lose their health insurance coverage; (B) if you like your current health insurance plan, you will lose it; (C) government bureaucrats would be put in charge of deciding which procedures and drugs would be covered; (D) Americans would face increased wait-times or be forced to seek care outside of their communities, especially in rural and underserved areas, because of hospital closures resulting from a government-run health care system; (E) Americans would lack access to the latest prescription drug therapies and medical device innovations, due to government price-controls similar to those imposed in the United Kingdom and Canada; and (F) the longstanding, bipartisan tradition of protecting Federal taxpayer dollars from funding abortions could be eliminated. (b) Sense of the Senate.--It is the sense of the Senate that-- (1) Medicare for All, or any one-size-fits-all government run health care system, would-- (A) eliminate private insurance that hundreds of millions of Americans currently utilize; (B) increase costs on middle-class families; (C) lead to delays in accessing care; (D) raid the Medicare program; and (E) result in hospital closures and a loss of access to health care services in rural America amidst the COVID-19 pandemic; and (2) efforts to enact such a proposal should be rejected. ______