A joint resolution commemorating the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian.

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the gentleman from Michigan and my good friend from New Jersey for the management of this proposed legislation.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of Senate Joint Resolution 41, as offered by the good Senator from the State of Colorado, Mr. Campbell; and I would like to take this occasion to commend Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell and Senator Daniel Inouye on the historic opening of the National Museum of the American Indian.

The museum's opening and the other celebratory events of this week represent a culmination of over 15 years of dedicated work by Senator Ben Campbell and Senator Daniel Inouye to establish a national museum that acknowledges and honors the history, the achievement, and the arts and the culture of Native Americans.

This museum also symbolizes the courage and determination of Native Americans to persevere in the face of over 500 years of hardship and adversity. The National Museum of the American Indian is a true national treasure, a living legacy to the vitality and creativity of the first Americans of our Nation, a treasure that would not exist today without the vision and the efforts of Senator Ben ``Nighthorse'' Campbell and Senator Daniel Inouye.

Senator Campbell has worked tirelessly on behalf of Native Americans throughout his distinguished career. He introduced important legislation for native communities on issues as divergent as economic development, job training, trust reform and health care. Senator Campbell has also introduced resolutions honoring the contributions of Native American veterans to the United States and designating November 2003 as National American Indian Heritage Month. Senator Campbell has been a leading voice in establishing Native American policies and addressing the numerous challenges facing the Native American people, and his voice will be sorely missed when he retires at the end of this congressional session.

Senator Inouye has a tremendous reputation among the American Indian community. He deserves high praise for his countless contributions to the health and the well-being of our Nation's native people. Senator Inouye has been actively involved in the Senate Committee on Indian Affairs since 1978, playing a key role in establishing the committee from a select committee to a standing committee in order to better address long-neglected issues affecting our Native American community.

Senator Inouye has introduced legislation recognizing tribal sovereign authority, supporting native health care, and in conjunction with Senator Campbell, authorizing the construction of the National Museum of the Native American Indian.

Mr. Speaker, I also commend the Native American Caucus here in our own Chamber, led by my colleagues, the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Kildee) and the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Hayworth) for their outstanding leadership on issues of concern to the Native American community. For 16 years I have proudly supported the Native American Caucus as it advanced the interests of Native Americans in Congress, in the ongoing mission to improve the relationship between the United States Government and the Native American tribes to one of dignity and mutual respect.

Mr. Speaker, when I think of the American Indian museum, I think of the many trials and tribulations and suffering of the Native Americans. I am reminded of their generosity and humanity to teach the first pilgrims how to farm and to save the first Europeans from starvation. I am reminded of the forced removal of the Cherokees on the infamous ``Trail of Many Tears,'' and the moving surrender speech of Chief Joseph, who said, ``My heart is sick and sad. From where the sun now stands, I will fight no more, forever.''

Mr. Speaker, when I think of the American Indian Museum, I am reminded of the great speech by Chief Seattle, a member of the Squamish-Dowamish tribe in the State of Washington, and I will submit the text of Chief Seattle's speech for the Record. Chief Seattle's speech was a moving and most profound and keen observation on the relations between Native Americans and our country; profound, in that his insights were prophetic and accurate. I want to share with my colleagues an excerpt of Chief Seattle's speech, and I quote.

``Every part of this country is sacred to my people. Every hillside, every valley, every plain and grove has been hallowed by some fond memory or some sad experience of my tribe. Even the rocks, which seem to lie dumb as they swelter in the sun along the silent shore in solemn grandeur thrill with memories of past events connected with the fate of my people. The very dust under your feet responds more lovingly to our footsteps than to yours because it is the ashes of our ancestors, and our bare feet are conscious of the sympathetic touch, for the soil is rich with the life of our kindred.''

Mr. Speaker, as my good friend and colleague, the gentleman from California (Mr. Baca) alluded to earlier, the unmet social, political, educational and health care needs of some 4.1 million Native Americans is still an embarrassment, at least in this Member's opinion, and is not a record of which our national government can be proud. Yes, we are giving assistance, but never enough to do the job. I, for one, am puzzled by our Nation's inability to provide the necessary resources to assist our Native American community

with the very serious problems affecting them, especially health care and education.

Today, Mr. Speaker, the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian is a celebration of the Native American contributions to our national identity as well as a testament to the drive and determination of our congressional leaders who fought to make this museum a reality. Again I applaud the efforts of Senator Ben ``Nighthorse'' Campbell and Senator Daniel Inouye for their leadership and initiative, and I am hopeful that Congress will now act to give our Native American community a voice in government, hopefully for generations to come.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support Senate Joint Resolution 41.

Mr. Speaker, the speech of Chief Seattle, referred to above, follows:

Chief Seattle's Speech

As Translated by Dr. Henry Smith--Seattle, Washington Territory, During

Treaty Negotiations--1854

Yonder sky that has wept tears of compassion upon our

fathers for centuries untold, and which to us looks eternal,

may change. Today is fair, tomorrow it may be overcast with

clouds.

My words are like the stars that never set. What Seattle

says the Great Chief at Washington can rely upon with as much

certainty as our paleface brothers can rely upon the return

of the seasons.

The son of the White Chief says his father sends us

greetings of friendship and good will. This is kind, for we

know he has little need of our friendship in return because

his people are many. They are like the grass that covers the

vast prairies, while my people are few and resemble the

scattering trees of a storm-swept plain.

The Great, and I presume, also good, White Chief sends us

word that he wants to buy our lands but is willing to allow

us to reserve enough to live on comfortably. This indeed

appears generous, for the Red Man no longer has rights that

he need respect, and the offer may be wise, also, for we are

no longer in need of a great country.

There was a time when our people covered the whole land as

the waves of a windruffled sea covers its shell-paved floor.

But that time has long since passed away with the greatness

of tribes now almost forgotten. I will not mourn over our

untimely decay, nor reproach my paleface brothers for

hastening it, for we too, may have been somewhat to blame.

When our young men grow angry at some real or imaginary

wrong, and disfigure their faces with black paint, their

hearts, also, are disfigured and turn black, and then their

cruelty is relentless and knows no bounds, and our old men

are not able to restrain them.

But let us hope that hostilities between the Red Man and

his paleface brothers may never return. We would have

everything to lose and nothing to gain.

True it is, that revenge, with our young braves is

considered gain, even at the cost of their own lives. But old

men who stay at home in times of war and mothers who have

sons to lose, know better.

Our great father, Washington, for I presume he is now our

father as well as yours, since George has moved his

boundaries to the North--our great and good father, I say,

sends us word by his son, who, no doubt, is a great chief

among his people, that if we do as he desires he will protect

us.

His brave armies will be to us a bristling wall of

strength, and his great ships of war will fill our harbors so

that our ancient enemies far to the northward--the Simsiams

and Hydas--will no longer frighten our women and old men.

Then he will be our father and we will be his children.

But can that ever be? Your God is not our God! Your God

loves your people and hates mine! He folds His strong arms

lovingly around the white man and leads him as a father leads

his infant son--but He has forsaken his red children. He

makes your people wax strong every day and soon they will

fill all the land; while my people are ebbing away like a

fast receding tide that will never flow again. The white

man's God cannot love His red children or He would protect

them. They seem to be orphans who can look nowhere for help.

How, then, can we become brothers? How can your Father

become our father and bring us prosperity and awaken in us

dreams of returning greatness?

Your God seems to us to be partial. He came to the white

man. We never saw Him, never heard His voice. He gave the

white man laws, but had no word for His red children whose

teeming millions once filled this vast continent as the stars

fill the firmament.

No. We are two distinct races, and must ever remain so.

There is little in common between us.

The ashes of our ancestors are sacred and their final

resting place is hallowed ground, while you wander away from

the tombs of your fathers seemingly without regrets.

Your religion was written on tablets of stone by the iron

finger of an angry God, lest you might forget it. The Red Man

could never remember nor comprehend it.

Our religion is the traditions of our ancestors--the dreams

of our old men, given to them by the Great Spirit, and the

visions of our Sachems, and is written in the hearts of our

people.

Your dead cease to love you and the homes of their nativity

as soon as they pass the portals of the tomb. They wander far

away beyond the stars, are soon forgotten and never return.

Our dead never forget the beautiful world that gave them

being. They still love its winding rivers, its great

mountains and its sequestered vales, and they ever yearn in

tenderest affection over the lonely-hearted living, and often

return to visit and comfort them.

Day and night cannot dwell together. The Red Man has ever

fled the approach of the white man, as the changing mist on

the mountain side flee before the blazing morning sun.

However, your proposition seems a just one, and I think

that my folks will accept it and will retire to the

reservation you offer them, and we will dwell apart and in

peace, for the words of the Great White Chief seem to be the

voice of Nature speaking to my people out of the thick

darkness that is fast gathering around them like a dense fog

floating inward from a midnight sea.

It matters little where we pass the remainder of our days.

They are not many. The Indian's night promises to be dark. No

bright star hovers above his horizon. Sad-voiced winds moan

in the distance. Some great Nemesis of our race is on the Red

Man's trail, and wherever he goes he will still hear the sure

approaching footsteps of the fell destroyer and prepare to

meet his doom, as does the wounded doe that hears the

approaching footsteps of the hunter.

A few more moons, a few more winters, and not one of all

the mighty hosts that once filled this broad land or that now

roam in fragmentary bands through these vast solitudes or

lived in happy homes, protected by the Great Spirit, win

remain to weep over the graves of a people once as powerful

and as hopeful as your own!

But why should I repine? Why should I murmur at the fate of

my people? Tribes are made up of individuals and are no

better than they. Men come and go like the waves of a sea. A

tear, a tamanamus, a dirge and they are gone from our longing

eye forever. Even the white man, whose God walked and talked

with him as friend to friend, is not exempt from the common

destiny. We may be brothers after all. We shall see.

We will ponder your proposition, and when we have decided

we will tell you. but should we accept it, I, here and now,

make this the first condition, that we not be denied the

privilege, without molestation, of visiting at will the

graves of our ancestors and friends.

Every part of this country is sacred to my people. Every

hillside, every valley, every plain and grove has been

hallowed by some fond memory or some sad experience of my

tribe. Even the rocks, which seem to lie dumb as they swelter

in the sun along the silent shore in solemn grandeur thrill

with memories of pass events connected with the fate of my

people, the very dust under your feet responds more lovingly

to our footsteps than to yours, because it is the ashes of

our ancestors, and our bare feet are conscious of the

sympathetic touch, for the soil is rich with the life of our

kindred.

The sable braves, and fond mothers, and glad-hearted

maidens, and the little children who lived and rejoiced here

and whose very names are now forgotten, still love these

solitudes and their deep fastnesses as eventide grows shadowy

with the presence of dusky spirits.

And when the last Red Man shall have perished from the

earth and his memory among white men shall have become a

myth, these shores will swarm with the invisible dead of my

tribe and when your children's children shall think

themselves alone in the field, the store, the shop, upon the

highway, or in the silence of the woods, they will not be

alone. In all the earth there is no place dedicated to

solitude.

At night, when the streets of your cities and villages

shall be silent and you think them deserted, they will throng

with the returning hosts that once filled and still live this

beautiful land.

The white man will never be alone. Let him be just and deal

kindly with my people, for the dead are not powerless.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

(Mr. Larson of Connecticut asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks, and include extraneous material.)

Mr. Speaker, I would like to associate myself with the remarks of the gentleman from Michigan. Indeed, I am pleased to support Senate Joint Resolution 41, commemorating the successful 15-year effort to create the National Museum of the American Indian and requesting the President to issue a proclamation for this occasion.

What a day it has been already, having the celebration kicked off this morning. So many Native Americans from my great State of Connecticut are down here for this very special commemoration.

I would also echo the remarks and sentiments of the gentleman from Michigan. What a great tribute. This is the 18th such museum that the Smithsonian has put up; and under their tutelage, we know that it is going to continue to be as spectacular as the 17 others that come under their control and auspices.

I am equally proud as well that so many tribes in the great State of Connecticut have contributed not only to our great economy and employment there but they themselves have been leaders. The Mashantucket Pequots of Mashantucket have put together their own museum and are going to collaborate here with the national museum.

They are both extraordinary sites and worth everyone visiting, as well as have the Mohegans in Connecticut who are also great economic contributors and employers in the State of Connecticut, who have also put together an educational program and archaeological field trips that teach both the culture and the storytelling and the lore of all that are so important.

So, Mr. Speaker, I am proud and encourage everyone to support this resolution today.

I am pleased to support S.J. Res. 41, commemorating the successful 15-year effort to create the National Museum of the American Indian (NMAI) on the Mall, and requesting the President to issue a proclamation for the occasion.

The legislation was originally introduced by Senators Campbell and Inouye, the chairman and ranking member of the Committee on Indian Affairs, and passed the Senate on July 22. Many of Connecticut's tribal nations are here this week for the commemoration.

The Museum encompasses the culture and history of indigenous peoples throughout the Western Hemisphere, who total more than 35 million.

The Museum, which is part of the Smithsonian Institution, opens today at 4.25 acre site southwest of the U.S. Capitol grounds. It is the only national museum devoted exclusively to the life, languages, literature, history and arts of cultures indigenous to the Americas.

Earlier today there are a ceremonial procession of Native Americans from the Smithsonian to the Capitol, followed by the Museum dedication ceremony on the Mall and the opening of the Museum to the public. A six-day festival and celebration on the Mall also begins today.

Besides the site on the Mall, the Museum also includes the George Gustave Heye Center, a museum in New York; and the Cultural Resources Center, a research and collections facility in Suitland, Maryland.

The National Museum of the American Indian is the 18th museum under the control of the Smithsonian. It was formally created by Congress in 1989 after the Heye Foundation in New York City agreed to transfer its own unique collection to the Smithsonian. Construction on the Mall began in 1999.

The structure has a unique architectural design using Kasota limestone which gives the appearance of having been weathered by the elements. It is a majestic setting which enhances the Mall, and the Museum's location along Independence Avenue near the Capitol ensures that it will become one of Washington's premier attractions for visitors. American Indians have played a key role in the Museum's design and fund-raising, as well as the exhibitions and programs.

The Smithsonian Institution has developed a special expertise in conceiving and managing museums which move beyond traditional concepts of exhibitions that remain static for decades, and instead allow living and evolving history to be displayed.

This is especially appropriate since Native American communities in the United States and Canada, and throughout the Hemisphere, remain vital forces in the cultural identifies of the many new nations with which they have been joined.

The Native American communities in the United States remain distinct, highly visible entities culturally, and often politically and economically, in the States where they are located. In this country alone there are more than 500 distinct Native cultural communities recognized by the Federal government, and States recognize still more.

There are more than two million indigenous peoples residing in the United States.

The Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, in my home State of Connecticut, in addition to being a major employer and economic force in the State due to its well-known casinos, was the first Tribe to make a large donation to the National Museum of the American Indian. Its $10-million donation was, at the time, the largest-ever single contribution to the Smithsonian. Both the Mohegan Tribe of Connecticut and the Oneida Tribe of New York later made similar donations.

The National Museum of the American Indian has also been the beneficiary of numerous other sizable donations from tribal communities and tribally related organizations. Tribes and tribal organizations have donated nearly one quarter of the approximately $199 million total cost of the Museum building, a testament to the continuing cultural and economic vitality of Indian tribes and their interest in disseminating knowledge to the broader American public.

The Mashantucket Pequots also own and operate the Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center in Mashantucket. This 308,000 sq. ft. facility houses the largest collection of Native American artifacts in the world. Four full acres of permanent exhibits at the Center depict 18,000 years of Native and natural history in thoroughly researched detail. The Mashantucket Pequot Tribe, along with the Mashantucket Pequot Museum and Research Center will continue to work together in a cooperative agreement with the National Museum of the American Indian.

The Mohegans have also created many educational resources to bring their contributions to a wider audience. Their Archaeological Field School provides an opportunity to learn about Native American history first-hand. Cultural and community programs bring Mohegan culture to life through presentations of tribal artifacts.

It is an honor for me to know personnally so many tribal leaders, including from the Mohegans, Lifetime Chief and former Chairman Ralph Sturges, Chairman Mark F. Brown, Vice Chairman Peter J. Schultz and Ambassador Jayne G. Fawcett; and from the Mashantuckets, Chairman Michael Thomas, Vice Chairman Richard ``Skip'' Hayward, Executive Director of Public Affairs Pedro Johnson, and Councilmember Kenny Reels.

Mr. Speaker, the successful completion of the National Museum of the American Indian bodes well for public interest in the National Museum of African American History and Culture, which was created by Congress last year and is in the preliminary stages of development, site selection and fund-raising.

I insert in the Congressional Record at this point a chronology of the development of the National Museum of the American Indian prepared by the Smithsonian Institution.

National Museum of the American Indian Chronology

1980--Discussions begin between the Smithsonian Institution

and the Museum of the American Indian, Heye Foundation in New

York City. The Heye collection of 800,000 objects,

representing tribes from the entire Western Hemisphere, was

one of the largest Native American collections in the world.

The talks were initiated by the museum's trustees, and

discussions centered on an affiliation with the Smithsonian

while still maintaining an independent museum in New York.

Although not conclusive in themselves, these early talks lead

the way to future negotiations.

April 1987--Smithsonian Secretary Robert McC. Adams

accompanied Senator Daniel Inouye (D-Hawaii) to New York to

talk with officials of the Museum of the American Indian,

Heye Foundation.

May 4, 1987--The board of trustees of the Museum of the

American Indian unanimously adopted a resolution providing

for an affiliation between its museum and the Smithsonian,

and for the relocation of the museum collections to a new

building on the National Mall in Washington.

May 11, 1987--The Smithsonian Board of Regents approved a

motion encouraging the Secretary to ``continue discussions

with representatives of the Museum of the American Indian,

Heye Foundation, about the prospect of a formal institutional

relationship between the museum and the Smithsonian.''

Following discussion with the Smithsonian and the Heye

Foundation's board of trustees, Senator Inouye introduced a

bill (S. 1722) on September 25, 1987, to establish a National

Museum of the American Indian within the Smithsonian

Institution.

The Smithsonian Institution continues its negotiations with

the board of trustees of the Museum of the American Indian,

Heye Foundation. The Smithsonian Board of Regents approved an

``agreement in principle'' on January 30, 1989 to transfer

the Museum of the American Indian collection to the

Smithsonian.

March 16, 1989--Julie Johnson Kidd, chairman of the Heye

Foundation, signed the agreement. The Smithsonian Board of

Regents gave its final approval to the agreement on May 8,

1989, and it was endorsed the same day by Secretary Adams.

Senator Inouye introduced S. 978 to establish the National

Museum of the American Indian on May 11, 1989, and Senator

Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colorado), at that time a U.S.

representative from Colorado, introduced companion

legislation, H.R. 2668 on June 15, 1989.

September 12, 1989--Secretary Adams joined Senators Inouye

and Campbell for a press conference announcing the

Smithsonian's revised policy on repatriation of American

Indian human remains in the National Museum of Natural

History collections. The legislation establishing the new

museum, to be named the National Museum of the American

Indian, would incorporate the repatriation policy and

appropriate funds for an inventory of human remains in the

Smithsonian's collections.

November 28, 1989--President George Bush signs legislation

establishing the National Museum of the American Indian as

part of the Smithsonian Institution.

May 21, 1990--Secretary Adams announced the appointment of

W. Richard West (Southern Cheyenne), as founding director of

the new museum, effective June 1, 1990.

April 1991--The Smithsonian selected Venturi, Scott Brown

and Associates Inc. of

Philadelphia to assist the National Museum of the American

Indian in developing general architectural program

requirements and criteria for the design of the new museum in

Washington, D.C., and for a Cultural Resources Center in

Suitland, MD, about six miles from Washington where the

museum's collections would be housed.

June 1992--The Smithsonian selected Polshek and Partners of

New York City, Tober + Davis of Reston, VA, and the Native

American Design Collaborative to provide architectural and

engineering services for the Cultural Resources Center.

A preview exhibition, ``Pathways of Tradition,'' a

selection of more than 100 objects representing American

Indian cultures and creativity, was on view at the

Smithsonian's George Gustav Heye Center of the National

Museum of the American Indian in New York City from November

15, 1992-January 24, 1993.

February 1993--The Smithsonian selected the architectural

firm of GBQC of Philadelphia in association with Douglas

Cardinal Architect Ltd. of Ottawa, Canada, to create the

design concept for the National Museum of the American Indian

on the National Mall in Washington.

October 30, 1994--The museum's Geroge Gustav Heye Center

officially opened in the Alexander Hamilton U.S. Custom House

at One Bowling Green in New York City.

January 1998--The Smithsonian terminated its relationship

with GBQC and Douglas Cardinal (Blackfoot) and the

Institution assumed responsibility for the design and

construction of the museum on the National Mall. Assisting

the Smithsonian were Polshek/Smith Group and Johnpaul Jones

(Cherokee/Choctaw).

September 28, 1999--The groundbreaking and blessing

ceremony takes place on the National Mall in Washington, DC,

at the site of the National Museum of the American Indian's

Mall Museum. The new museum will occupy the Mall's last

remaining site. Three planned inaugural exhibitions will

feature historic and contemporary aspects of Native life, and

will highlight artifacts from the museum's priceless

collection.

June 26, 2001--The Smithsonian Institution awarded a

contract to ``CLARK/TMR, A Joint Venture,'' to build the

National Museum of the American Indian. CLARK/TMR is composed

of the Clark Construction Company of Bethesda, MD, and Table

Mountain Rancheria Enterprises Inc., a construction company

that is a subsidiary of the Table Mountain Rancheria of

Friant, CA.

September 14-15, 2002--A national Pow Wow was sponsored by

the museum on the National Mall adjacent to the museum

construction site. Approximately 25,000 people attended to

watch nearly 500 Native Americans dance over the two-day

event.

November 20, 2002--A ``topping out'' (a circular section of

glass was installed on the roof of the building) ceremony and

blessing was held to mark the completion of the major

structural elements of the new building.

January 15, 2004--The first phase of occupancy of the new

museum by staff begins.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone) may control the remainder of my time.

Mr. President, today I have introduced the Emergency Relief for Rural Borderlands Act.

This act deals with a problem which is probably well known to many of my colleagues--the insufficient number of H2-B visas available for temporary seasonal employment this year.

U.S. laws governing labor-based immigration have always maintained that employers must give priority to American workers. I support this philosophy, as I am sure the rest of my colleagues do as well.

I also acknowledge the reality that sometimes there are jobs that, for a variety of reasons, cannot be filled by American workers. This is a fact of life. We can see it on our farms, in our restaurants, and on our construction sites.

My legislation deals with one small sub-set of these foreign workers, temporary seasonal laborers under the H2-B visa program. H2-B guest workers may work in the United States for no more than 6 months, at the end of which they must return to their countries of origin. They fill critical gaps in the labor market, which in turn helps American companies to prosper year-round. They work at summer camps and resorts, for fisheries and for landscapers, and in many other non-agricultural pursuits.

My legislation does not propose to fix the H2-B crisis across the board. Some of my colleagues have introduced legislation to this end, and I would not presume to improve upon their proposals. My legislation represents, instead, a commitment to the needs of a unique geographical situation--rural borderlands.

In my State of Minnesota, and indeed across the country, rural areas continue to be challenged economically. It would be safe to say that there is a crisis in rural America today. To address the challenges faced by rural communities, I introduced the Rural Renaissance Act, and others in the Senate have also introduced legislation that is directed towards rural America. What the Rural Renaissance Act would do is help rural, small towns develop the infrastructure needed to expand communities and create jobs. It takes a long-term view of what is needed in rural America. But at the same time, there is another, temporary crisis for those in rural America who can't get the H2-B visa laborers they rely on. This kind of labor shortage is the last thing rural America needs.

Rural communities located near the border have a special set of challenges, which go beyond even what the rest of rural America is dealing with. Companies who are recruiting workers naturally target the cities and towns closest to them. But when a company is located near an international border, the pool of U.S. workers in close proximity is smaller than for companies located more centrally.

For example, take Warroad, MN, in Roseau County. Roseau, like many rural counties in Minnesota, is dealing with a number of challenges-- from out-migration of younger people leaving behind an aging population, to economic sluggishness, to inadequate infrastructure and even flooding issues. The town of Warroad, population 1,722, is located about 6 miles from the U.S.-Canada border. The largest company in Warroad is a first-class window manufacturer, Marvin Windows.

Because of its relationship to construction, the window industry has a seasonal element to it. During the summer, Marvin hires hundreds of American college students to work at its factory in Warroad. But when these students go back to school, there are short-term positions which need to be filled through December. For the last 8 years, Marvin Windows has relied on Canadian workers to fill these critical positions. This year, because of the early date when the cap on H2-B visas was reached, Marvin Windows is looking at a big gap in their employment--which not only could hurt their revenues this year, but also threatens to undercut their long-term reputation as a reliable supplier of windows.

I am aware that my colleague Senator Hatch has introduced legislation to remedy the H2-B visa shortage. I support this legislation. But as we have seen, there is not yet consensus on it.

Companies like Marvin Windows cannot afford to wait much longer. That's why I have proposed the Emergency Relief for Rural Borderlands Act. This legislation is admittedly less ambitious than Senator Hatch's legislation, or Senator Kennedy's bill. My legislation would simply observe the unique circumstances facing rural areas--which are challenged economically already--as well as the realities of the labor pool for companies located near our borders. My legislation would relieve these rural borderlands from the visa cap for this year only. Moreover, my legislation would only give relief to those companies who can demonstrate that they have relied on the program in the past, by limiting eligibility to only those companies which have made use of H2- B workers in at least 2 of the last 5 years.

My legislation is not a permanent fix, nor is it a comprehensive fix. I know that there are deserving companies that are not going to be able to qualify under my legislation. My legislation is only applicable this year, and I am sure we will need to revisit this issue again next year.

But if we in the Congress cannot reach agreement on a comprehensive solution for this visa shortage, perhaps the time has come to look at a more limited approach. Rural America has unique labor requirements, and borderlands have challenging recruitment conditions. If we begin by looking at the needs of areas that are both rural and close to the border, we can help the economies that stand to be hurt the most by the shortage in H2-B visas this year.

I urge my colleagues to support this legislation.

I ask unanimous consent that the text of the bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 7 minutes to the gentleman from American Samoa (Mr. Faleomavaega).

(Mr. FALEOMAVAEGA asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. Speaker, may I inquire about the amount of time I have remaining?

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume, and I do not intend to use all the time, but I do want to speak out about the National Museum of the American Indian.

First of all, let me say that 15 years after Congress passed legislation calling for the establishment of a National Museum of the American Indian, we finally arrive today at the day when American Indians have a place to call their own in the Nation's Capital. I had the opportunity today to witness most of the procession that took place beginning at 9 a.m. and then the opening

ceremony at 12 noon, and then the opportunity this afternoon to go and visit the museum itself. So I want to talk a little bit about my firsthand experiences today and why I think it is so significant that this museum has finally opened.

When I was talking to Native Americans today, some of whom I had met before, some of whom I had not, they all seemed to say the same thing, which is, finally, finally, the day had come when they were going to be recognized in this museum. I asked some of them what they meant by that, and they pretty much said the same thing, which was that for a long time in these United States, Native American culture was not paid attention to.

Many people, I would say, particularly on the East Coast, are not even aware of the fact that Native American communities continue to exist. It is almost as if they are something that happened and occurred a long time ago, maybe 100 years ago, and now there is very little knowledge on the part of many Americans about Native Americans or their communities. So the museum seeks to change all that.

When I went through the museum today, there was, of course, reference to the genocide that occurred, there was, of course, reference to, I remember one particular place where there is a wall that talks about how so many Native Americans were wiped out through diseases when Europeans arrived. But, generally speaking, it was not so much a museum about the past, it was much more a museum about communities that exist today, the peoples that exist today, the cultures that exist today, and the uniqueness of them and how there is so much variety between the various tribes and Indian nations, not only in the United States, but in all of the Americas.

So the museum has become an affirmation of the fact that Native Americans and their communities not only continue to exist, but are growing and are vibrant and are an important part of American culture. I think that is a lesson that is certainly important for nonNative Americans. In the museum today, most of the people seemed to be American Indians, but there were certainly a lot of people who were not, and the museum serves as a way of explaining to them how the Native American culture continues to exist and survive and strive and move forward.

I have to also say that looking at the museum, the artwork was just unbelievable, not only in terms of traditional culture, such as baskets, moccasins, clothing, and blankets, but also in terms of modern art, like abstract art and abstract paintings. It truly is a museum that encompasses the entire spectrum of the Native American culture. So I just want to say that when I went down there today and witnessed the museum, I just felt that this was sort of the culmination of the artistic achievement of the Native American culture in the United States.

The other thing that was so significant was the opening ceremony today. I think they estimated there were over 10,000 native peoples that participated in the opening ceremony. They were arranged alphabetically by tribe. And when you saw them march, you could see the pride in their faces, you could see the children that were learning from the experience, you could see the elders that were so proud to be there, and the various cultures in just watching that procession with the various tribes.

I do not know how many tribes were represented. I am sure there had to be hundreds, not only from the United States, but also throughout the Americas. I saw Incas from Peru, I saw people from the extreme southern part of South America, and I saw Arctic peoples. It was just truly amazing.

So I just want to close today, although I do see we have another speaker that I will yield some time to, but I want to close today by saying on my behalf, and also on behalf of the Native American Caucus, of which I am one of the vice chairs, we want to welcome the thousands of Native Americans that came to Washington to celebrate the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian, and certainly ask my colleagues here in the House to join in the celebration this week and take time to reflect now upon the rich culture of Native Americans.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Washington (Mr. McDermott).

Mr. Speaker, I yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson-Lee).

Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the Senate joint resolution (S.J. Res. 41) commemorating the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Senate Joint Resolution 41 commemorates the opening of the National Museum of the American Indian.

Today brings to a conclusion a concept that started over 20 years ago, to create a national museum in our Nation's capital which is dedicated exclusively to Native American art, history, and culture.

Today will also mark the beginning of a lasting tribute to those individuals who were our country's earliest inhabitants.

The Smithsonian Institution's National Museum of the American Indian sits adjacent to the National Air and Space Museum on over 4 acres of land, just southwest of the U.S. Capitol.

The building's appearance is unlike any other in Washington, D.C., and it has symbolic references to Native American culture. The building's limestone exterior gives it the appearance of natural rock formations that have been carved by wind and water.

Three-quarters of the site is reconstructed natural habitats that are indigenous to this southeastern region, and the building itself will display about 8,000 objects from its permanent collection. The displays will include not only historical artifacts, but will also portray ongoing vital contributions Native Americans bring to this Nation's art and culture.

The building has some special features which include an entrance facing east toward the rising sun, a prism window and a 120-foot high atrium called the Potomac, which was designed in consultation with many Native Americans.

Native Americans indeed have had profound influences on our Nation's culture from the very birth of our country through today and will continue into the future.

At a time when our military receives so much focus, it is important to remember that some of our military's great heroes, such as the code talkers, were Native Americans who helped preserve our country's ideals and beliefs.

It is also important to note that Native Americans make up less than 1 percent of the total U.S. population, but represent half the languages and cultures in the Nation.

The term ``Native American'' includes over 500 different groups and reflects great diversity of geographic location, language, socioeconomic conditions, and retention of traditional spiritual and cultural practices. However, many teaching materials present a generalized image of Native American people with little or no regard for differences that exist from tribe to tribe. I believe this museum provides a strong presentation of these differences and will be very educational to the viewer and to the Nation.

It is remarkable that Native Americans have retained many of their longstanding traditions, even though numerous outside influences create pressures for change.

Thanks to the efforts of Senator Inouye and our former House colleague, Senator Ben Nighthorse Campbell, legislation was signed by former President George Herbert Walker Bush on November 28, 1989; and today this museum has become a reality.

I hope all my colleagues and all who visit our Nation's capital will take the opportunity to visit this wonderful museum, and I urge my colleagues to support S.J. Res. 41.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time to close. I have no further speakers other than myself.

Mr. Speaker, I continue to reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to wrap up this debate. I thank my colleagues for their fine speeches and good comments that have been made. However, I must express my concern that the gentleman from Washington State tarnished this joyous event by raising partisan issues, and I certainly dispute the gentleman's statement that the current President of the United States would have stopped the construction of this museum if he had been able to. That is certainly a wrong assumption, and I am sorry that statement was made.

I want to speak on behalf of the full Congress and say we are very pleased to join the Smithsonian and the Native American community in this country by celebrating the completion of this museum. It will be a tremendous asset to this country in understanding the first human inhabitants of this continent, and I hope everyone who proceeds through the museum will regard with great reverence and respect the history of the American Indian and learn a great deal about the founders of this country and who established the first governments. I am very pleased to be able to participate in this event.