Commending the Virginia Wesleyan College Marlins men's basketball team for winning the 2006 National Collegiate Athletic Association Division III National Basketball Championship.

Mr. Speaker, I want to thank the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Sessions), my friend, for yielding me the customary 30 minutes, and I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, today we remember that terrible day of September 11, 2001. We continue to mourn for those who are lost. Our hearts continue to ache for the loved ones left behind. We honor those first responders who saved so many lives. We continue to stand firm as we pursue justice against those who perpetrated those attacks. And we remain committed to finding and eliminating terrorists around the world.

Mr. Speaker, almost every year since 2001, Congress has passed resolutions commemorating the September 11 attacks. In past years those resolutions have been thoughtful, appropriate, and solidly bipartisan, as they should be. Sadly and unfortunately, that is not the case this year.

Instead, the Republican leadership of this House has chosen to include controversial language in the resolution, including language celebrating the passage of legislation that many of us, both Democrats and Republicans, find to be deeply problematic.

For example, the resolution before us celebrates the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act, which I and many others, Republicans and Democrats, believe went too far in sacrificing American's constitutional civil liberties.

Rand Corporation terrorism expert Brian Michael Jenkins recently made

this point very well. He argues that strengthening America must involve preserving American values. And I quote: ``We cannot claim to be a Nation of laws, a champion of democracy, when we too easily accept a disturbing pattern of ignoring inconvenient rules, justifying our actions by extraordinary circumstances, readily resorting to extrajudicial actions based on broad assertions of unlimited executive authority, and espousing public arguments against any constraints on how we treat those in our custody. The defense of democracy demands the defense of democracy's ideals. To ignore this is to risk alienation and isolation. And defeat.''

Additionally, Mr. Speaker, the resolution before us celebrates the 2005 passage of what many of us consider to be a punitive, controversial immigration bill, a bill that couldn't even pass the Republican Senate and a bill that President Bush does not even support.

Mr. Speaker, it did not have to be this way, and it should not be this way. On Monday night the United States Senate passed its own version of the September 11 resolution, S. Res. 565, and I will insert a copy of the Senate bill at the conclusion of my remarks.

Mr. Speaker, the Senate bill approaches this issue the right way. It sticks to remembering the victims, condemning the attacks and their perpetrators, recommitting the United States to fighting terrorism, and commending the members of our Armed Forces, law enforcement personnel, first responders, members of the intelligence community, and others who are on the front lines of this effort. The Senate bill was cosponsored by every single Senator, Republican and Democrat. Every single Senator put their names on this bill, and it was passed unanimously. For the life of me, I cannot figure out why the same thing is not good enough for the leadership in this House. Why on this subject, where unity is vitally important, does the leadership of this House seek disunity? Let us commemorate, not politicize, September 11.

This resolution should not be a Republican resolution. It should be a resolution that defies party label. I am worried that some in this House are so consumed with politics that they would use this terrible tragedy for partisan gain, and I find that offensive.

The resolution before us also states as fact that ``the Nation is safer than it was on September 11, 2001.'' Mr. Speaker, I would argue that the actions of this administration, particularly the war in Iraq, have made us less safe. Five years ago the world stood in sympathy and solidarity with America. Today, America's standing in the world is at the lowest point in history. Mr. Speaker, we invaded and now occupy a country that posed no imminent threat to the United States. Despite definitive and repeated findings that there were no ties between Iraq and al Qaeda, a finding most recently echoed by the Republican- controlled Senate Intelligence Committee, the President and Vice President continue their misleading efforts to link al Qaeda, Osama bin Laden, Iraq, and 9/11 all together.

The war in Iraq and the war against terrorism are distinct. The present Iraq policy, many of us believe, has made us less safe and must be changed. Even our top generals in Iraq have conceded that our policy in Iraq has actually produced more terrorists. This does not make us safer, Mr. Speaker. It makes us more isolated and more vulnerable in an increasingly dangerous world.

We know that resources were diverted from Afghanistan, where the 9/11 deadly plot was born, in order to invade and occupy Iraq. And we know now that the trail of Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of 9/11, has grown stone cold. We know that the President's policies in Iraq have put an enormous strain on our military, with U.S. military readiness levels now at historic lows.

We know that the independent 9/11 Commission has just issued a 5-year report card on President Bush and the Congress filled with D's and F's on homeland security. And I think we all know, if we are being honest with ourselves, that we in this Congress have underfunded so much of our homeland security.

We know that the invasion and occupation of Iraq has increased the budget deficit to record proportions because this administration and Congress have done what no other President and Congress have ever done in the history of the United States: they have continued to fund this war completely outside the normal budget and to grant a series of tax cuts to the wealthiest of the wealthy during a time of war.

And we know, Mr. Speaker, that Iraq is rapidly descending into an ethnic and religious civil war with a daily civilian toll that tells every single Iraqi that nowhere is safe from violence, not their homes, not their jobs, not their schools, not even their hospitals.

Mr. Speaker, this resolution could have been, should have been a thoughtful, bipartisan commemoration of September 11, its victims, and the men and women who fight to protect us each and every day. That is what we should have on the floor today. Unfortunately, the resolution before us does not meet that standard.

Members of this House have differences about policy. There are differences about the war in Iraq, and I respect and appreciate my colleagues on the other side of the aisle who have a very different opinion on this war than I do. We have differences about protecting civil liberties. We have differences about how best to deal with immigration. But there are no differences, there are no differences, when it comes to honoring the memories of those lost on September 11. There are no differences when it comes to commending the men and women on the front lines of the war on terror. And there are no differences when it comes to the desire to protect this country from future terrorist attacks.

Mr. Speaker, I regret that the leadership of this House, during this most solemn week, has chosen not to focus solely on the things that bring us together as Members of Congress and as Americans

S. Res. 565

Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked four

civilian aircraft; crashed two of them into the towers of the

World Trade Center in New York City; and crashed the third

into the Pentagon outside Washington, DC;

Whereas the fourth hijacked plane, United Airlines Flight

93, crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, near the town

of Shanksville, after the passengers and crew of that flight

struggled with the terrorist-hijackers to take back control

of the plane, ultimately preventing the flight from reaching

its likely destination in Washington, DC;

Whereas the heroic actions of the rescue workers,

volunteers, Federal, State and local officials who responded

to the attacks with courage, determination, and skill are to

be commended;

Whereas thousands of innocent Americans, and civilians from

many other countries, were killed and injured as a result of

these attacks;

Whereas Congress declared, in the aftermath of the attacks,

September 12, 2001 to be a National Day of Unity and

Mourning;

Whereas there has not been a terrorist attack on the United

States homeland since the terrorist attacks five years ago;

but al Qaeda has perpetrated terrorist attacks throughout the

world against U.S. persons, facilities, and interests, as

well as U.S. allies during that time; Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the Senate:

(1) commemorates the life of each individual who died as a

result of the attacks of September 11, 2001;

(2) extends its deepest condolences to the victims of these

attacks, as well as to their families, friends, and loved

ones;

(3) once again condemns in the strongest possible terms the

attacks, the terrorists who perpetrated them, and their

sponsors;

(4) commits to support the necessary steps to interdict and

defeat terrorists who plot to do harm to the American people;

(5) recommits itself and the nation to bringing to justice

the perpetrators of the attacks, along with their sponsors;

(6) honors and expresses its gratitude to members of its

Armed Forces, law enforcement personnel, first responders,

members of intelligence community and others who have bravely

and faithfully participated in the War on Terrorism since

September 11, 2001;

(7) declares September 11, 2006, to be a National Day of

Remembrance, in commemoration of the terrorist attacks

against the United States on September 11, 2001; and

(8) declares that when the Senate adjourns today, it stand

adjourned as a further mark of respect to each individual who

died as a result of the attacks of September 11, 2001.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I appreciate the comments from both my friend from Texas and my chairman of the Rules Committee, Mr. Dreier, the gentleman from California, and I would just say that that was a really good campaign speech as he went through a litany of issues. But this is not a day for campaign speeches.

Once I finish my sentence.

And I would say to the gentleman that on Monday, those Members who were in town, Republicans and Democrats, gathered on the East Front of the Capitol in solidarity. There were no campaign speeches, there was no politics. People gathered in solidarity together to commemorate those who lost their lives and to honor those who gave such tremendous sacrifice on September 11th.

The United States Senate on Monday night had a resolution that every single Member of the United States Senate, Republican and Democrat, both, all co-sponsored and passed unanimously. There was unity. There was a desire not to debate the PATRIOT Act, not to debate the House version of the Border Security bill which the Republican-controlled Senate doesn't like and even the President doesn't like. It was about putting all those issues aside where there are differences, not just between Democrats and Republicans, I would say to the gentleman from Texas, but on issues like the PATRIOT Act there were a number of Republicans who had concerns about it.

So this is not about one party versus the other. But on an issue like this involving commemorating the terrible tragedy of September 11 and honoring those who sacrificed their lives, I

would like to think in the spirit here of what happened Monday night and using the example of what went on in the United States Senate, that we could rise to the occasion

Mr. Speaker, I would yield to the gentleman from California (Mr. Dreier).

I thank the gentleman for his comments and reclaim my time.

Mr. Speaker, let me state for the record that in 2002, when we had a resolution on this issue, it passed unanimously. In 2004 and 2005, the resolutions that were brought to this floor were jointly sponsored by Representatives Hyde and Lantos both times. There was an effort at bipartisanship then, and I think that is the model. That is the model we should be following here. The bottom line is this is not a resolution that has been produced as a result of bipartisan consultation.

But let me go back to the point I was trying to make in the beginning, and that is, this is a very solemn week, and we should not be doing anything but trying to bring this House together like they did in the United States Senate so that we speak with one voice and that we make it clear that we are together when it comes to commemorating those who lost their lives and those who have sacrificed so much and those who continue to put their lives on the line for the protection of all people.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to remind some of the previous speakers here that the title of this bill, H. Res. 994, is expressing the sense of the House of Representatives on the fifth anniversary of the terrorist attacks launched against the United States on September 11, 2001. And I do that because we have heard a lot of speeches here and we have talked about a lot of different issues that are separate from commemorating those who lost their lives, those who sacrificed on September 11, those who continue to protect our country.

We have talked about the PATRIOT Act and border security. We have talked about a whole litany of things, and those are all certainly important issues and legitimate issues for us to discuss, how best to protect this country. Those are things we should be debating here on a regular basis on the House floor, but they are controversial, some of these initiatives. They are controversial with a lot of Members of your own party.

I wish we would get back to the point that this resolution here today, and what some of us are troubled by, is that this should be about unity and this should be about honoring those who sacrificed, those who lost their lives, those who have served our country so well. That is what this should be about and not a litany of controversial items that you want to promote during a campaign year.

If you want to do that, do it in a separate resolution, take up a separate bill, but we should all be together when it comes to a resolution on September 11.

The United States Senate got it right. They got it right over in the United States Senate. We should do the same here in the House.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I would just respond to the gentleman by again pointing to what the other body, the United States Senate, did where 100 Senators, Democrats, Republicans, came together as one, cosponsored a resolution and voted unanimously for a resolution.

That is what we should be doing during this solemn week, not introducing legislation that inspires, quite frankly, the kind of debate that we have here today about issues that really are not about commemorating that day but issues that are highly controversial, ranging from everything to immigration to civil liberties to you name it. That is not the way we should be doing this

Mr. Speaker, I yield 3\1/2\ minutes to the distinguished gentleman from New York (Mr. Hinchey).

Mr. Speaker, let me just take issue with the gentleman from Texas. He says this whole question of the Nation being safer than it was on September 11, 2001, has nothing to do with this resolution. Well, that is what it says in this resolution, if he reads the resolution. There are some things contained in this resolution that people over here, and that people on both sides legitimately have some questions with.

Mr. Speaker, may I inquire how much time remains.

Mr. Speaker, I will close for our side.

Mr. Speaker, the issue about whether or not the Nation is safer than it was on September 11, 2001, is a legitimate topic for debate, but not on this resolution. The issue of the PATRIOT Act, there are differences on that. I have a lot of reservations about the PATRIOT Act, as do many Republicans. That is a legitimate debate we should continue to have. The issue about how best to protect our borders is a serious and important and legitimate issue. President Bush and Senator McCain have one opinion on how we should do it, which I think makes a heck of a lot more sense than the view of the Republican majority in this House, but that is certainly a legitimate debate. But it doesn't belong in a resolution commemorating the lives and the sacrifices of those individuals on September 11, 2001.

And I guess I wish that just once, just once the leadership on the other side of the aisle could bring to this floor a piece of legislation, especially on an issue like this, that is not stained with politics. Why does everything have to have a political slant to it? I think people are sick of it, I really do. I think on issues like this people want us to come together, as we have done in the past, as the other body has done, and speak with one voice. Let us not make this into something it shouldn't be.

So, Mr. Speaker, I am asking Members of this House to vote ``no'' on the previous question so that we can consider a much better resolution, one that respectfully commemorates this most somber occasion. If the previous question is defeated, I will amend the rule so that instead of voting on the divisive partisan resolution made in order under this rule, we will consider the text of the truly bipartisan resolution that was adopted in the Senate on the fifth anniversary of September 11.

Not only was this measure passed by unanimous consent in the Senate on September 11, the actual day of the anniversary, it was cosponsored by every single Member of the United States Senate: every single Democrat, every single Republican.

Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent to insert the text of my amendment and extraneous materials immediately prior to the vote on the previous question.

Mr. Speaker, this is the resolution we should be considering today, and let me tell you why. It was not written for political gain or for 30-second sound bites. It was written with the sole intent and purpose of remembering the tragic events of September 11, 2001, and to honor and mourn the victims of that horrific day.

I think we owe it to the people of this great Nation to put politics aside for this one day and show that we are Americans first and that some things are sacred and should never be used for political purposes.

So I would urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on the previous question so we can consider the Senate version of the September 11 commemorative.

Mr. Speaker, I yield back my time

Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.

Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Rules, I call up House Resolution 996 and ask for its immediate consideration.

Mr. Speaker, for the purpose of debate only, I yield the customary 30 minutes to my friend the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern), pending which I yield myself such time as I may consume. During consideration of this resolution, all time yielded is for the purpose of debate only.

Mr. Speaker, this rule provides for 4 hours of debate in the House, equally divided and controlled by the majority leader and minority leader or their designees. It waives all points of order against consideration of the resolution and also provides one motion to recommit, which may not contain instructions.

Finally, it provides that notwithstanding the operation of the previous question, the Chair may postpone further consideration of the resolution to a time designated by the Speaker.

Mr. Speaker, we are here today, 5 years after the tragedy of September 11, to speak with one voice to let the world know that we have not forgotten the lessons of that terrible day. We are here to remember the thousands ruthlessly murdered by our enemies who hijacked four civilian aircraft and crashed them into the World Trade Center towers, the Pentagon and a field in Pennsylvania, and to recognize the unimaginable losses suffered by their families. We are also here to honor the sacrifices and the courage shown by our first responders who selflessly rushed to the flaming buildings in order to rescue the victims of these attacks.

We are also here to let our allies in the war on terror know that we stand united with them in the war on terror, and to recognize the progress that continues to be made by our Federal intelligence, law enforcement and security agencies in conjunction with intelligence, law enforcement and security agencies of our allies, in keeping Americans safe. And we are here to remind these allies and to place our enemies on notice that we will never shirk from the war on terror and that we will never forget what happened on September 11, 2001.

The six-page resolution should be recognized by every Member of this body as an opportunity to remember our Nation's tragic loss and to encourage every American to do the same. It is an opportunity to extend our sympathies to the families of the lost and to honor those who risked their own lives and health trying to protect the lives and health of others.

It is an opportunity to extend our gratitude to our intelligence and military personnel serving at home and abroad and their families for their service. It is to thank the citizens of other nations who are contributing to the effort to defeat global terrorism.

More importantly, it is an opportunity by this body to reaffirm that we remain vigilant and steadfast in the war on terror, that we remember the sacrifices made by so many innocent Americans on September 11 and that we will never succumb to the cause of terrorists.

Mr. Speaker, the resolution that will be brought here before the House for a vote is an earnest, heart-felt and comprehensive resolution putting the House on record and standing once again against terrorism.

This House already has a strong record on this topic and has already passed a number of bills designed to accomplish the main goal laid out in this resolution, to remember the lessons of 9/11 and to honor the victims by preventing another attack on American soil. We have voted to give our law enforcement the tools they need to prosecute the war on terror in the United States and throughout the world, and through the passage of the USA PATRIOT Act and its reauthorization we have once again reaffirmed that.

We have voted to implement a key component of the 9/11 Commission by creating Federal standards for the application process in the issuing of State identification cards through the REAL ID Act.

And this House has voted to secure our borders through the Border Protection, Antiterrorism, and Illegal Immigration Control Act and to defend our ports through the Security and Accountability for Every Port Act. We have made important reforms in the intelligence community through the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act and provided our first responders with the resources that they would need with our annual Homeland Security authorization and appropriations process.

Mr. Speaker, this House has accomplished a great deal on behalf of the American people to ensure the citizens of the United States that they can be safe here and abroad, but we understand that this job is not yet done. Next week the House is scheduled to consider legislation that will build upon all of this hard work, legislation to further boost our national security and to give our law enforcement the tools it needs to prevent our shadowy, ever-shifting, and determined enemy to once again demonstrate that we do not rest in the war on terror and that we will not forget.

I encourage all of my colleagues to join me in supporting this rule to let our allies and our enemies alike know that we will continue the war on terror both in memory of those murdered on September 11 and for the generations still to come who will look back and evaluate our ability to put partisanship aside and to stand together on behalf of our Nation, our citizens, and, in fact, our civilization.

I encourage all of my colleagues to support this resolution.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, the gentleman, my colleague, from Massachusetts does clearly talk about the differences of opinion that we have, and I respect that difference. I would also say that this body has an obligation to move forward and work on issues that we think are correct and right. And quite honestly, Republicans do see what has happened to

this country, I believe, in a significantly different way than what my colleagues, the Democrats, see.

Several months ago we had a vote, and we have done this several times, but a vote on the intelligence bill where the Democrat Party wanted and had a vote on the floor that would require law enforcement and intelligence to release every single name of every single person under investigation by the FBI and intelligence agencies to the Congress, to nonlaw enforcement officials. These are the kinds of ideas that Ms. Pelosi and the Democrats have about how we go about protecting this country. We politely disagree.

The resolution here today is not about policy as it relates to what we are trying to pass today. It is about how this act that happened on 9/11 we will not forget. We will thank the men and women who protected us that day. We will stand behind the men and women of our military and intelligence organizations. We give thanks to the families who are here in this country whose loved ones serve on the front lines. And, lastly, we will let our allies know and the terrorists know that we will stay to the end. That is what this resolution is about.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the chairman of the Rules Committee, Mr. Dreier.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from California (Mr. Dreier).

Mr. Speaker, at this time I would like to yield to the gentleman from Georgia, Dr. Gingrey, 4 minutes.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, we think we got it right. We think we did the PATRIOT Act right. We think we did intelligence authorization right. We think we do a lot of things right around here. We are going to stand up for this country, Mr. Speaker. We are going to stand up for the men and women who protect our country. We are going to stand up and give the men and women of the intelligence community the things that they need.

Today, it is right and fitting to say thank you; we will not forget and we will be vigilant to protect this country. That is what this resolution is about

Mr. Speaker, I yield 5 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. King), the chairman of the Homeland Security Committee.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

The gentleman from New York described his disagreement with the administration. I understand that. We had seen the administration before this President ignore, completely ignore, the advice from the CIA. As a matter of fact, I remember at least one CIA director resigned under President Clinton because he could not get President Clinton to pay attention to more than 3 hours in a month to the intelligence needs of this country.

We have already talked about how vote after vote after vote by the Democrats that they choose to gut our ability, in my opinion, to effectively not only have law enforcement but to chase down those that may do harm against this country.

Some choose to characterize that we are not safer today than what we were before the attack. I completely disagree with that. I would completely disagree with that because I think every single American that day learned of the tremendous forces that were aimed at the United States that we had really been completely unaware of before.

So I think that we are better off today. Are we absolutely safe? No. Are we safer? Yes, we are, and we have a responsibility to maintain that line of defense.

This resolution has nothing to do with that. It is a resolution, the force of this body, to say we respect the men and women who on 9/11 gave their lives; we are sorry for the men and women who have been injured as a result of that; we are going to support our military; we are going to support the families and we will never forget; and we are going to back up our allies; and we are going to make sure that we get it right. That is what this resolution is about.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes,'' and I urge my colleagues to vote ``yes'' because it is the honorable and the right thing to do, to say thank you to the men and women who gave their lives, to say thank you to the men and women who were heroic in their efforts to try and save people, and it is the right thing to do to say to the men and women of our military and our intelligence communities that we believe you have not only done a great job but we thank your families also for those sacrifices.

We believe it is the right thing to do to remember this event 5 years later. We believe it is the right thing to do to let the world know that the United States Congress, this body, in this House resolution, believes that we will stay strong not only in the war on terrorism but that we believe that fighting for civilization and peace and opportunity in this world is the right thing.

We have heard from three of this Congress' greatest leaders, Phil Gingrey, Pete King, who is the chairman of the committee, and the young chairman of the Rules Committee, Mr. Dreier, as they have spoken eloquently about not only what this country stands for but about how our respectfully saying thank you and remembering this day is a part of our job and is the right thing to do.

I urge all of my colleagues to vote on behalf of this resolution

The material previously referred to by Mr. McGovern is as follows

Previous Question for H. Res. 996, the Rule for H. Res. 994 Expressing the Sense of the House of Representatives on the 5th Anniversary of the Terrorist Attacks launched against the United States on September 11,

2001

Strike all after the resolved clause and insert:

``Resolved, That upon the adoption of this resolution it

shall be in order without intervention of any point of order

to consider in the House the resolution printed in section 2

expressing the sense of the House of Representatives upon the

five-year anniversary of the terrorist attacks against the

United States on September 11, 2001. The resolution shall be

considered as read. The previous question shall be considered

as ordered on the resolution and preamble to final adoption

without intervening motion or demand for division of the

question except: (1) four hours of debate equally divided and

controlled by the Majority Leader and Minority Leader or

their designees; and (2) one motion to recommit.''

Sec. 2. The following is the text referred to in Section 1:

Resolution

``A resolution expressing the sense of the House of

Representatives upon the five-year anniversary of the

terrorist attacks against the United States on September 11,

2001.

Whereas on September 11, 2001, terrorists hijacked four

civilian aircraft, crashed two of them into the towers of the

World Trade Center in New York City, and crashed the third

into the Pentagon outside Washington, D.C.;

Whereas the fourth hijacked plane, United Airlines Flight

93, crashed in Somerset County, Pennsylvania, near the town

of Shanksville, after the passengers and crew of that flight

struggled with the terrorist-hijackers to take back control

of the plane, ultimately preventing the flight from reaching

its likely destination in Washington, D.C.;

Whereas the heroic actions of the rescue workers,

volunteers, and State and local officials who responded to

the attacks with courage, determination, and skill are to be

commended;

Whereas thousands of innocent Americans, and civilians from

many other countries, were killed and injured as a result of

these attacks;

Whereas Congress declared, in the aftermath of the attacks,

September 12, 2001, to be a National Day of Unity and

Mourning; and

Whereas there has not been a terrorist attack on the United

States homeland since the terrorist attacks five years ago,

but al Qaeda has perpetrated terrorist attacks throughout the

world against United States persons, facilities, and

interests, as well as United States allies during that time:

Now, therefore, be it

Resolved, That the House of Representatives--

(1) commemorates the life of each individual who died as a

result of the attacks of September 11, 2001;

(2) extends its deepest condolences to the victims of these

attacks, as well as to their families, friends, and loved

ones;

(3) once again condemns in the strongest possible terms the

attacks, the terrorists who perpetrated them, and their

sponsors;

(4) commits to support the necessary steps to interdict and

defeat terrorists who plot to do harm to the American people;

(5) recommits itself and the Nation to bringing to justice

the perpetrators of the attacks, along with their sponsors;

(6) honors and expresses its gratitude to members of the

United States Armed Forces, law enforcement personnel, first

responders, and others who have bravely and faithfully

participated in the War on Terrorism since September 11,

2001; and

(7) declares September 11, 2006, to be a National Day of

Remembrance, in commemoration of the terrorist attacks

against the United States on September 11, 2001.''

Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time, and I move the previous question on the resolution.

Mr. Speaker, I thank my friend for yielding. And I want to congratulate the gentleman from Dallas for his very hard work and superb management of this important resolution that we are considering here.

Mr. Speaker, 5 years ago this week, an act of war pierced the security and peace of our Nation. The murder of nearly 3,000 by terrorist fanatics shook our country to its core and stirred within each and every one of us the determination to defend our freedom and our liberty with all of our might.

The global war on terror, a war that we did not start, has delivered many successes. Most of the top leadership of al Qaeda have been captured or killed. In Iraq and Afghanistan, where terror was once cultivated and exported, 50 million people now have democratically elected governments. Some of the most wanted terrorists in Iraq, such as Osama bin Laden's deputy Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, are no longer free to wantonly murder.

There have been quiet successes that fall beyond the scope of the military and away from the field of battle, Mr. Speaker. Following passage of the PATRIOT Act, we have seen terrorist cells that have been broken up here in the United States, five in particular, domestic terrorist cells that have been broken up because of the existence of the PATRIOT Act.

And we have also seen the breakup around the world of these cells because of legislative initiatives that we have taken since September 11, 2001. The Justice Department has won 253 convictions in terror- related cases across the United States.

Intelligence gathering and cooperation between allies resulted in foiling a plot to blow up commercial airliners flying from London to the United States just weeks ago. It is absolutely essential that those in charge of keeping us safe have every tool necessary to do so.

The results of these diplomatic, intelligence, and military efforts are encouraging. Five years after September 11, 2001, our homeland has not been attacked again, and that seems to be so often forgotten, Mr. Speaker. Every day we thank God that, because of what we have done and because of the initiative of our courageous men and women, the United States of America has not seen an attack in 5 years, when many predicted that we would see them follow immediately following September 11, 2001. Yet, as the years prior to 9/11 proved, periods of security at home can lead to a false security. An enemy that has no regard for human life and no tolerance for freedom is an especially fierce foe. They act and operate according to the belief that, in the words of Osama bin Laden, and I quote, ``death is better than living on this earth with the unbelievers amongst us.'' Those are the words of bin Laden.

Mr. Speaker, like the Cold War, the global struggle will be measured in decades, not years or months. While it is important and appropriate to question the tactics used in the global war on terror, there can be no doubt that it is critical to stay vigilant, stay committed, and stay on the offense. There have been many trying and somber days in the prosecution of this war, and there will be many more to come. We are especially thankful, as the gentleman from Dallas just said, to our men and women in uniform, from local law enforcement to those in the military. We offer our deepest appreciation for the opportunity they have given our Nation to know safety and freedom.

Now, Mr. Speaker, as we proceed with this legislation, I am convinced that, contrary to what was said by my friend from Massachusetts, this resolution will enjoy strong bipartisan support just as resolution after resolution that we have passed since September of 2001 have enjoyed.

Now, I have gone through and looked at past resolutions that have enjoyed great support from Democrats and Republicans in this House, and they have gone through many of the things that we have done to recognize what it has taken to be successful. And I believe that focusing on our border security is critical for that, and that is why the House-passed version of the border security measure was important. And I am pleased that we have the chairman of the Homeland Security committee, Mr. King. He has worked very hard on this and testified yesterday on behalf of the nexus between our security and the fact that border security is national security.

Similarly, we have found that by breaking up the financial network through legislation like the SWIFT program, which has enjoyed great success, and unfortunately was disclosed in the media, we have had success in breaking up the financial aspect of those who would do us in because of the initiatives that we and this administration have taken. Mr. Speaker, I would argue that had we not taken the initiatives that we have over the past 5 years, things like the PATRIOT Act, we would not be here today without having suffered another attack on our soil.

Today, we express our condolences, our thoughts and prayers with the families and the loved ones of those what paid the ultimate price on September 11, 2001, and the single best thing that we can do for every single one of them and their families is to ensure that we put into place the tools necessary so that it will never, ever happen again.

Would the gentleman yield?

I was just accused of making a campaign speech when I am talking about the reverence of September 11.

Mr. Speaker, let me begin by saying it was within our leadership that I first mentioned the idea of our once again singing God Bless America on the East Front of the Capitol, and I believe that that was a very important moment to once again let the American people know that we stand together, and it was my hope that we would be able to see strong bipartisanship as we proceed in these coming weeks following the fifth anniversary of September 11.

I also would like to say that as we look at this resolution, and a strong attempt was made by our leadership team to work with Members of the minority to fashion a resolution that would enjoy bipartisan support. And I believe that it is essential for us to recognize the tools that have allowed us to ensure that we have not suffered another September 11. And I deeply resent being accused of making a campaign speech as we revere the lives that were lost on September 11.

I thank my friend for yielding.

Mr. Speaker, I would simply like to say that I think the gentleman from Massachusetts makes a very important point. We have seen resolutions since September 11, 2001 pass unanimously and enjoy strong bipartisan support. I would recommend that my colleagues look at the resolutions that were passed year after year since September 11, 2001, and recognize that in those resolutions we talked about the different tools and the things that have been utilized to ensure that we win the global war on terror. We want this to be bipartisan. Mr. Speaker, I will predict that when this resolution is voted on, that it will enjoy strong bipartisan support

Mr. Speaker, I thank the gentleman for yielding, and I in particular appreciate the opportunity to be able to speak on this issue, an issue which I believe is vital to the history of our Nation and indeed to the future of our Nation.

As the sponsor of the legislation and chairman of the Homeland Security Committee, I took a special interest in doing all that I could to ensure that this resolution would reflect the thinking of the Congress and would not be at all provocative.

But the fact is, September 11 was the darkest day in our Nation's history. It was also a day of exceptional bravery and courage, and year after year since September 11, 2001, we have expressed this sense of the Congress, we have expressed the sense of the House. We have pointed to the tremendous bravery that occurred that day, the actions of the police and the fire and the emergency workers. We have certainly referred to the terrible suffering that occurred that day.

But also, it is essential we not just lament what happened that day, not just acknowledge the suffering of that day, but I believe we owe it to history to show what Congress has done. It is not enough just to say we feel sorry for what happened. It is important we show what we are doing, what we are doing as Members of Congress, to respond to the horrors of that day.

In putting together this resolution, the leadership on our side of the aisle reached out to the other leaders certainly. On my committee, we reached out to Democratic members of our committee trying to put together a resolution, and the fact is the gentleman from Massachusetts, who is a good friend of mine, he acts as if this resolution this year is so markedly different than what was passed in previous years.

Well, if you go back to 2004, the resolution referred to introduced by Mr. Hyde and Mr. Lantos, H. Res. 757, it goes through a long listing of what has been done since September 11, 2001. It refers to the war in Iraq as being part of the war against terrorism. It refers to port security and border security, to the Terrorism Threat Immigration Center. It talks about taking away the financial assets of terrorists. It goes on and on, listing a number of issues which apparently today would be considered extremely controversial.

We make no reference at all to Iraq in today's resolution, other than to mention the men and women of our Armed Forces who are in Iraq and Afghanistan. We make no mention of the NSA electronic surveillance program which enjoys the support of the overwhelming majority of American citizens. We make no reference to the SWIFT program, which is going after the terrorist finances, which was to me in violation of the Espionage Act released on the front page of the New York Times. Even though it is entirely legal and entirely effective, we make no reference to that, but we do talk about the PATRIOT Act because that was a response of Congress.

Now, history may judge that we did the wrong thing. I am absolutely convinced we did the right thing in passing the PATRIOT Act, and I think we owe it to the American people to let them know what we did. Also, maritime security, intelligence reform, port security, immigration reform, all of these are tied to the issue of international terrorism.

This is the way Congress responded, and I think it is not enough just to say it was a tragedy that happened on September 11. Let us talk about what we did.

The gentleman from Massachusetts says he objects to the language in here that we are safer since September 11. Okay. Maybe we can have an honest difference of opinion on that. The fact is, even the co-chairmen of the 9/11 Commission say we are safer today than we were on September 11. The junior Senator from my State has said we are safer now than we were on September 11. These are certainly not Republican apologists.

Quite frankly, while I understand the good faith on the other side, I as a person who lost almost 150 friends, neighbors and constituents resent the fact that by us introducing the resolution this is a campaign speech.

As I was going to commemoration after commemoration on Monday, I did not say this as being part of the campaign. To me, this is our way of responding. Again, you may be right, and maybe in the future people will say it was wrong to break down the wall between the FBI and CIA and it may be wrong to be going after terrorist assets and it may be wrong to listen in on terrorist conversations. So be it. Let history be our judge.

But let this resolution stand for what Congress has done, is doing and wants to do if we are serious about winning the war against international terrorism.

If we want to talk about campaigns, I would wonder where were you in 2004 when a resolution, if you want some partisan references, by your definition would be far more partisan than we are introducing here today or is it perhaps that the political party has been changed somehow, and now what was more than acceptable in 2004 is not even remotely acceptable today?

So, if we are going to inject politics into it, let us be honest who is raising the political issue. I know that our leadership and the Speaker of the House went out of his way and their way to try to make this a bipartisan resolution. I certainly did. When you compare what we are stating today and what we stated in 2004, to me there is no doubt over who is being partisan and who is trying to exploit this issue. I find that wrong.

I am saying I am proud to stand with this resolution. I am proud to support it. I urge the overwhelming majority of Republicans and Democrats to put aside partisanship, you do not have to agree with every word of our resolution, to say that Congress has responded and has done its best to respond to the attacks of September 11.

Again, let history be our judge. I am more than willing for history to be our judge, and I am proud to stand on the record of the Congress, Republicans and Democrats, and I urge the adoption of the rule and urge the adoption of the underlying resolution.

Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong support of this rule and the underlying resolution. As we just marked the fifth anniversary of the September 11 terrorist attack launched against the United States, it is more important than ever that we stand united in condemning terrorism as we engage in this epic battle for the future of civilization.

In this war on terror, Mr. Speaker, we are not in a battle of civilizations, we are in a battle for civilization, and our enemies are actively and aggressively adjusting their tactics while waging their terrorist war of religious intolerance against the free nations of the world.

Our government has achieved many successes in this war and we have made substantial progress. We have enacted strong legislation, including the PATRIOT Act and the Homeland Security Act of 2002 which created the Department of Homeland Security. We have strengthened our borders and ports through the Enhanced Border Security and Visa Entry Reform Act of 2002 and the Maritime Transportation Security Act of 2002. We have funded our first responders in the amount of $41.5 billion. Our intelligence agencies are working together like never before, thanks in large part to the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism Prevention Act of 2004.

While many of our political opponents have disagreed with our efforts, these changes are directly responsible for preventing another attack against our Nation since 9/11.

Thanks to our counterterrorism techniques, the United States and our allies have foiled several terrorist plots, disrupted terrorist cells, including several in our own country, and brought many high-profile terrorists to justice.

Just one month ago, Mr. Speaker, British authorities in London foiled a plot to blow up as many as 10 United States bound commercial airliners. The cooperation of British and American intelligence and counterterrorism authorities that led to the foiling of this plot is proof of two indisputable facts: First, we cannot let our guard down in the fight against terrorism; and, second, the steps Congress has taken since the tragic events of 9/11 are indeed working.

It is therefore critically important, Mr. Speaker, that we continue giving America the tools it needs to fight the global war on terror.

As stated by the 9/11 Commission, we must continue making strides and using terrorism finance as an intelligence tool. It is absolutely appalling that, in the light of this, 174 of my Democratic colleagues still voted against H. Res. 895, legislation supporting intelligence and law enforcement programs that track terrorists and condemning the publication of any classified information that could potentially impair the fight against terrorism. Not only did House Democrats vote against making the Committee on Homeland Security permanent at the beginning of this Congress, 120 of them opposed the creation of Homeland Security in the first place.

Mr. Speaker, no matter how much we have at times disagreed on how to prosecute the war on terror, none of us will ever forget the attacks of September 11. Let me be clear. By supporting this resolution, we are standing strong and sending a message that we will continue fighting the terrorists. We will prevail no matter how long it takes. We are telling the terrorists that they will never again catch us off guard, and that an enemy committed to the death and destruction of the American way of life will not prevail. I know the strength of America, I know the strength of her people, and I know that we will be victorious in this fight for freedom. We must continue honoring the memory of those heroes who died on 9/11 by standing strong against terrorism and taking the fight to the enemy.

This resolution simply reaffirms our commitment, and it deserves, as our chairman and Mr. Sessions said, the full support of this fight. I hope all of my colleagues will join me in supporting this rule and the underlying resolution.