Healing the Invisible Wounds Act of 2006

Mr. President, I rise proudly today on behalf of our Nation's veterans and returning servicemembers to introduce the Healing the Invisible Wounds Act of 2006. This legislation will enhance the counseling and readjustment services provided by the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA). And it will protect the rights of veterans to receive PTSD compensation--now or in the future.

Many of the men and women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan are suffering from some of the most severe physical injuries. However, even more of these brave servicemembers have invisible wounds--difficulties with adjusting to not being on the battlefield or dealing with long- lasting visions and experiences that they encountered. My bill is intended to ensure that these men and women receive the readjustment counseling and mental health services necessary to transition into what we hope to be a full and productive life after combat.

This issue is especially relevant following the release of a mental health care study conducted by the Army Institute of Research which revealed that as many as 35 percent of Iraq war veterans received mental health care services in the year after their return home. The study concluded that the high rate of using of mental health care services among Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans after deployment highlights challenges in ensuring that there be adequate resources to meet the mental health needs of returning veterans.

As we all know, the transition period for these soldiers is extremely critical. So critical that it can, in some cases, mean the difference between short-

term readjustment issues and severely chronic psychological conditions. This bill supports and encourages greater cooperation between VA and the Department of Defense, DoD, through the expansion of innovative Reunion and Re-entry activities carried out by Vet Center staff. These activities provide members of the National Guard and Reserves with counseling services during the transition from their deployment overseas to civilian life.

Demobilization often occurs so rapidly for these returning servicemembers that they sometimes do not receive or are overwhelmed by the benefits information they need. It is understandable that our servicemembers are much more focused on being reunited with their loved ones than caring about what benefits they are eligible to receive. My bill provides a comprehensive approach by providing group session counseling, a one-hour private counseling session, a presentation to family members about counseling-related matters, and other services that are deemed appropriate by the Secretaries of Veterans Affairs and Defense. My bill ensures that these services are provided no later than 14 days upon return and that servicemembers be retained on active duty until they receive these crucial counseling services.

In order to provide feedback and reflection about how to better serve veterans in this capacity, my bill requires a report from VA. The report would detail the costs associated with the provision of counseling services, an assessment of the efficacy of the services provided to meet the readjustment needs of veterans, and a survey-based assessment regarding the satisfaction of veterans receiving these services, that would include the manner in which these services are provided.

Servicemembers have paid a great price in defending freedom. Access to treatment and counseling to heal invisible wounds must be considered a continuing cost of war. In that spirit, this legislation would authorize $180 million for the provision of readjustment counseling services. Colleagues, if there's one lesson we've learned thus far, it is that the earlier we provide these services, the better chance we have of preventing more serious mental health conditions. We need to invest in our future now. If we don't provide these services, we will be paying a much, much higher price in the future.

The safe counseling havens of VA include Vet Centers, which are great conduits for the delivery of these types of transition activities. All Vet Centers are staffed by veterans who can relate to the experiences that these OIF/OEF veterans commonly share.

In 2005, Vet Centers cared for more than 44,900 veterans of the Global War on Terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition, Vet Centers provided bereavement counseling to more than 800 surviving family members of over 525 servicemembers who were killed while on active duty serving their country. Despite increases in the number of veterans coming to Vet Centers for care, the budget for the program has remained relatively stagnant.

My bill would also address PTSD benefits for veterans. Instead of being proactive and allocating resources to address these challenges while at the same time caring for older veterans, a fear of rising costs prompted a reactionary response from many in Washington. Some policy makers believe that reducing veterans' compensation for PTSD by reexamining 72,000 previously awarded claims might be a good way to save money. This is a bad idea.

Many times, VA compensation is the only source of income for severely disabled veterans and their families. I am thankful that VA set aside its plan to move forward with the PTSD Review late last year. However, there are ongoing efforts to re-evaluate how PTSD is compensated. The Institute of Medicine and Disability Benefits Commission are currently reviewing veterans' disability compensation. This bill requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to Congress 6 months prior to modifying how PTSD is compensated under the disability compensation rating system. Veterans will no longer have to worry that the administration will cut disability compensation in order to save money.

Through budget shortfalls and constraints, we must remain steadfast in ensuring that our servicemembers and their families do not suffer in silence from the invisible wounds that they receive in the name of freedom. Many of us fail to give invisible wounds the attention they require. I urge my colleagues to join me in taking another step towards healing our veterans by enacting this important measure.

I ask unanimous consent that the full text of the bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. President, I rise proudly today on behalf of our Nation's veterans and returning servicemembers to introduce the Healing the Invisible Wounds Act of 2006. This legislation will enhance the counseling and readjustment services provided by the Department of Veterans' Affairs (VA). And it will protect the rights of veterans to receive PTSD compensation--now or in the future.

Many of the men and women who served in Iraq and Afghanistan are suffering from some of the most severe physical injuries. However, even more of these brave servicemembers have invisible wounds--difficulties with adjusting to not being on the battlefield or dealing with long- lasting visions and experiences that they encountered. My bill is intended to ensure that these men and women receive the readjustment counseling and mental health services necessary to transition into what we hope to be a full and productive life after combat.

This issue is especially relevant following the release of a mental health care study conducted by the Army Institute of Research which revealed that as many as 35 percent of Iraq war veterans received mental health care services in the year after their return home. The study concluded that the high rate of using of mental health care services among Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans after deployment highlights challenges in ensuring that there be adequate resources to meet the mental health needs of returning veterans.

As we all know, the transition period for these soldiers is extremely critical. So critical that it can, in some cases, mean the difference between short-

term readjustment issues and severely chronic psychological conditions. This bill supports and encourages greater cooperation between VA and the Department of Defense, DoD, through the expansion of innovative Reunion and Re-entry activities carried out by Vet Center staff. These activities provide members of the National Guard and Reserves with counseling services during the transition from their deployment overseas to civilian life.

Demobilization often occurs so rapidly for these returning servicemembers that they sometimes do not receive or are overwhelmed by the benefits information they need. It is understandable that our servicemembers are much more focused on being reunited with their loved ones than caring about what benefits they are eligible to receive. My bill provides a comprehensive approach by providing group session counseling, a one-hour private counseling session, a presentation to family members about counseling-related matters, and other services that are deemed appropriate by the Secretaries of Veterans Affairs and Defense. My bill ensures that these services are provided no later than 14 days upon return and that servicemembers be retained on active duty until they receive these crucial counseling services.

In order to provide feedback and reflection about how to better serve veterans in this capacity, my bill requires a report from VA. The report would detail the costs associated with the provision of counseling services, an assessment of the efficacy of the services provided to meet the readjustment needs of veterans, and a survey-based assessment regarding the satisfaction of veterans receiving these services, that would include the manner in which these services are provided.

Servicemembers have paid a great price in defending freedom. Access to treatment and counseling to heal invisible wounds must be considered a continuing cost of war. In that spirit, this legislation would authorize $180 million for the provision of readjustment counseling services. Colleagues, if there's one lesson we've learned thus far, it is that the earlier we provide these services, the better chance we have of preventing more serious mental health conditions. We need to invest in our future now. If we don't provide these services, we will be paying a much, much higher price in the future.

The safe counseling havens of VA include Vet Centers, which are great conduits for the delivery of these types of transition activities. All Vet Centers are staffed by veterans who can relate to the experiences that these OIF/OEF veterans commonly share.

In 2005, Vet Centers cared for more than 44,900 veterans of the Global War on Terrorism in Afghanistan and Iraq. In addition, Vet Centers provided bereavement counseling to more than 800 surviving family members of over 525 servicemembers who were killed while on active duty serving their country. Despite increases in the number of veterans coming to Vet Centers for care, the budget for the program has remained relatively stagnant.

My bill would also address PTSD benefits for veterans. Instead of being proactive and allocating resources to address these challenges while at the same time caring for older veterans, a fear of rising costs prompted a reactionary response from many in Washington. Some policy makers believe that reducing veterans' compensation for PTSD by reexamining 72,000 previously awarded claims might be a good way to save money. This is a bad idea.

Many times, VA compensation is the only source of income for severely disabled veterans and their families. I am thankful that VA set aside its plan to move forward with the PTSD Review late last year. However, there are ongoing efforts to re-evaluate how PTSD is compensated. The Institute of Medicine and Disability Benefits Commission are currently reviewing veterans' disability compensation. This bill requires the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report to Congress 6 months prior to modifying how PTSD is compensated under the disability compensation rating system. Veterans will no longer have to worry that the administration will cut disability compensation in order to save money.

Through budget shortfalls and constraints, we must remain steadfast in ensuring that our servicemembers and their families do not suffer in silence from the invisible wounds that they receive in the name of freedom. Many of us fail to give invisible wounds the attention they require. I urge my colleagues to join me in taking another step towards healing our veterans by enacting this important measure.

I ask unanimous consent that the full text of the bill be printed in the Record.

Mr. President, today, on the anniversary of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.'s assassination, I am pleased to join with my colleague in the House, Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney to introduce the Martin Luther King, Jr., Record Collections Act. This act will ensure the expeditious disclosure and preservation of records relevant to Dr. King's life and death. Fully releasing these records--many of which are not subject to disclosure until 2038--will shed significant light on a turning point in American history. My friend, Representative John Lewis, explained its necessity quite eloquently:

I, too, was the subject of unwarranted FBI surveillance

during the Civil Rights Movement. Because we do not know this

part of our history, it is clear that we are beginning to

repeat it. Recently, we became aware of the administration's

domestic spying program that has targeted peace groups that

are carrying on the nonviolent action of Dr. King. It is time

that we know our history, and passage of the Rev. Martin

Luther King, Jr. Records Act will take us one step closer to

uncovering that history.

Judge Joseph Brown, the last presiding judge in James Earl Ray's post-conviction relief proceedings, also supports this legislation. He believes that it is important to:

. . . fully release the still classified historical record

surrounding the life and death of the late Dr. King. In light

of the disturbing records and documents that came to light in

James Earl Ray's petition before me and in consideration of

the recent furor over the power and authority granted to

certain officials under the guise of the Homeland Security

Act, it might prove most illuminating to review the

historical record relative to the exercise of purportedly

similar power and authority by the U.S. officials 40 years

ago. The American public, the citizens of the Land of the

Free and Home of the Brave deserve this access to the

historic record surrounding the life and death of Dr. King.

Our legislation will create a Martin Luther King Records Collection at the National Archives. This will include all records--public and private--related to the life and death of Dr. King, including any investigations or inquiries by Federal, State, or local agencies. The records will be organized in a central directory to allow the public to access them online from anywhere in the world. The documents will be overseen by a review board consisting of at least one professional historian, one attorney, one researcher, and one representative of the civil rights community.

The MLK Records Review Board, a five-member independent agency, will be responsible for facilitating the review and transmission of all related records to the Archivist for public disclosure. Members will be nominated by the President and approved with the advice and consent of the Senate. It will have the power to direct government offices to locate and organize related records and transmit them for review or release. It will also have the power to investigate the facts surrounding the transmission or possession of records, take testimony of individuals in order to fulfill their responsibilities, request the Attorney General to subpoena private persons or government employees to compel testimony or records and require agencies to account in writing for any previous or current destruction of related records. In addition, the Board can request that the Attorney General petition any court in the U.S. or abroad to release any sealed information or physical evidence relevant to the life or death of Dr. King, and to subpoena such evidence if it is no longer in the possession of the government. The MLK Records Review Board will also be required to provide annual reports to Congress, the President, the Archivist, and all government agencies whose records have been reviewed, and to the public. The Board must terminate its work no later than 5 years from the passage of the Act unless it votes to extend for an additional 2- year term.

The reason for having such a Board is to ensure that someone is responsible for finding all relevant records and that the records do not disclose any sensitive information. It is particularly important to have a Board like this given recent revelations by the New York Times that the government has begun removing thousands of declassified documents on a wide range of historical subjects from public access at the National Archives. There has perhaps never been a more urgent time to bring the records on Dr. King into the light of day. According to the National Archives, about 9,500 records totaling more than 55,000 pages have been withdrawn from the public shelves and reclassified since 1999. We need to ensure that the records relating to the life and death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., do not suffer the same fate. They are too important to us at this point in American history.

Dr. King challenged the conscience of my generation, and his words and his legacy continue to move generations to action today. His love and faith is alive in the millions of Americans who volunteer each day in soup kitchens or in schools, and those who refused to ignore the suffering of thousands they'd never met when Hurricane Katrina destroyed lives and communities. His vision and his passion are alive in churches and on campuses when millions stand up against the injustice of discrimination or the indifference that leaves too many behind.

The best way to honor the memory of Dr. King is to finish his work at home and around the world. And the first step to furthering his legacy is to know the full body of it. I hope that my colleagues will join me in this very important effort: to preserve and learn from records relating to the life and death of Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Mr. President, this is National Public Health Week, and the American Public Health Association and its over 200 partner organizations and sponsors have organized events to raise awareness about the importance of public health in this nation. This year, the theme of National Public Health Week, ``Designing Healthy Communities: Raising Healthy Kids,'' focuses on building healthy communities to promote and protect the health of our children.

This focus on building healthy communities is both timely and critical. We are losing ground with respect to the health of our Nation's children. Studies have found that the percentage of overweight children and adolescents has more than doubled in the last few decades; without intervention, 1 in 3 children born in 2000 can expect to develop diabetes in their lifetime. My home State of Illinois has the unfortunate distinction of having the highest number of lead-poisoned children. And other diseases and conditions, including high blood pressure and asthma, are on the rise in young populations.

As bleak as the health situation is for so many children, there is good news. Many of these diseases and health conditions are completely preventable or can be delayed for many, many years. The American Public Health Association and countless other expert organizations have told us, and shown us, that if we make a real commitment to and investment in building healthy communities, we can substantially improve the health of our children and adults. Today I am introducing the Healthy Places Act of 2006, which will do just that.

The Healthy Places Act of 2006 focuses on the built environment, which includes our homes, schools, workplaces, parks and recreation areas, business areas, and transportation systems. Where we work, live, and play has tremendous implications for our health, and improvements to these environments will lead to: greater opportunities for physical activity and a reduction in injuries because of safe sidewalks, biking paths, and parks; less reliance on personal automobiles which reduces toxic emissions; better access to fresh fruits and vegetables which leads to healthier nutrition; and the planning and building of ``green'' homes and buildings which decreases energy consumption.

Like many other States, Illinois has already begun to take steps to improve the environment. City leaders in Chicago have recognized that many low-income families have no access to fresh foods and medicine because there are no grocery stores and pharmacies in their neighborhoods. Retail Chicago, an initiative of the city's Department of Planning and Development, is now using redevelopment funds to entice local developers to bring grocery stores and pharmacies into these neighborhoods.

The Lieutenant Governor's initiative ``Six Weeks to a Greener Illinois'' is another fine example. Now in its 4th week, this effort has encouraged Illinoisans to participate in making the State a healthier place to live, and rewarded those communities that are already taking steps to do so.

The Healthy Places Act of 2006 would expand these and other efforts to improve the planning and design of communities that can promote healthier living. It establishes and supports health impact assessment programs, which would assist States and local communities in examining potential health effects of major health policy or programmatic changes. The newly created Interagency Working Group on Environmental Health would facilitate communication and collaboration on projects among the agencies in order to better address environmental health issues. In addition, the bill creates a grant program to address environmental health hazards, particularly those that contribute to health disparities. Finally, the Healthy Places Act provides additional support for research on the relationship between the built environment and the health status of residents as recommended by two Institute of Medicine's reports: ``Does the Built Environment Influence Physical Activity?'' and ``Rebuilding the Unity of Health and the Environment: A New Vision of Environmental Health for the 21st Century''.

As the health of our children continues to decline, and our health expenditures continue to soar, it is imperative that the Congress take action, and focusing on building healthier communities is a necessary step in this regard. I encourage all of my colleagues to join me and support passage of this bill.

Mr. President, I rise today to introduce legislation that will provide a win-win for the environment and for the farmers and ranchers who receive their irrigation water from the North Unit Irrigation District in central Oregon. My colleague, Senator Ron Wyden, joins me in cosponsoring this bill. Companion legislation is also being introduced today in the House of Representatives by Congressman Greg Walden.

This legislation represents an opportunity to benefit nearly nine hundred farm and ranch families as well as the fish and wildlife resources of the Deschutes and Crooked Rivers. It will do so by removing a limitation in North Unit's Federal water contract with the Bureau of Reclamation. This limitation prevents the Distict and its patrons from participating in a conserved water project pursuant to the laws of the State of Oregon.

Removing this contract restriction will enable North Unit to conserve its water supplies further through the implementation of conserved water projects. In order to comply with State law, the District would return a specific percentage of the ``conserved'' water back to the Deschutes River permanently as instream flows for fish, wildlife, or other purposes. A related change would enable the District to use Deschutes Project water on acreage in its service area that is currently irrigated with Crooked River water. The savings from these two changes could ultimately allow the District to reduce its reliance on its privately developed Crooked River supplies.

Located in central Oregon's Deschutes Basin, the farm and ranch families of the North Unit Irrigation District are the embodiment of the Federal Reclamation program. Working small and medium parcels of land, they raise grass seed, carrot seed, and alfalfa hay, as well as cattle, sheep, and horses. The overriding limitation to their ability to compete successfully in the international marketplace is a shortage or water. For these families, conservation is the most efficient means to alleviate their shortage and succeed in the market.

After self-financing over eight million dollars in canal lining and other measures to increase the efficiency of their limited water supplies, North Unit would like to participate in a state water conservation program. Unfortunately, the District's Federal contract prevents it from doing so. This point has been confirmed to me by officials with the Bureau of Reclamation, an agency of the Department of the Interior. Therefore, North Unit's contract must be amended. Since Congress actually legislatively executed the District's contract in a 1954 statute, it is Congress, and not the Department of the Interior, that must remove this contract restriction.

These targeted contract changes are specific to the North Unit Irrigation District's contract. For the landowners served by the District, these changes will enable them to use their water resources more efficiently, maintain their competitiveness in the market, and benefit the fish and wildlife resources of both the Deschutes and Crooked Rivers. Our efforts are supported by the Oregon Water Resources Department, which has jurisdiction over State water rights issues. I urge my colleagues to support this legislation, and I will press for its timely consideration.