Veterans Emergency Care Fairness Act of 2008

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the Senate bill (S. 2162) to improve the treatment and services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs to veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders, and for other purposes, as amended.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

We are considering two bills. This first one, S. 2162, as amended, the Veterans' Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008, and the next one is going to be about the Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act of 2008. These are two bills which passed the Senate, and is an omnibus bill that includes legislation from the Senate and from the House.

Many of our Members have legislation in this bill. And they are two bills that are really going to be great for veterans, greatly enhance the benefit in both the health field and on the benefit field.

As we have discussed these bills, we have learned much about the needs of our Nation's veterans, and this bill goes a long way to address them. Rates for post traumatic stress disorder, for example, amongst Operation Enduring Freedom and Operation Iraqi Freedom veterans has been estimated to be higher than 30 percent. Additionally, as we have tragically learned, suicide is on the rise. The Army reports, in fact, rates as high as they were during the Vietnam War. And the rate of homelessness among this cohort is also tragically growing. We must act now to address these issues before it's too late.

We know from past wars that some veterans will struggle with substance abuse, homelessness, and PTSD. And we can see the same patterns emerging as a result of the stress of repeated deployments to OEF and OIF.

This bill expands and improves the health care services available to veterans fighting substance use disorders and requires that all VA medical centers provide veterans access to the full continuum of care for substance use disorders.

I would like to recognize both the leadership of the chairman of the Subcommittee on Health, Mr. Michaud, and Ms. Berkley for their strong advocacy for veterans who suffer with substance use disorder and for their contributions to this very important provision in the bill.

As a way to honor the memory of Justin Bailey, a brave veteran that we lost to the horrors of war, this bill would ensure that the VA conduct more research about the often tragic relationship between PTSD and substance use disorders. The bill allows

community mental health centers in rural areas to work with the VA to provide peer outreach and support services as well as readjustment and mental health services.

We now know that PTSD not only affects the veteran, but also has a profound effect on their family. Thanks to the leadership of Mr. Hare from Illinois, this bill makes necessary changes to the law to allow the VA to provide needed counseling to families of veterans.

In addition to addressing the mental health challenges facing our veterans, many also experience homelessness. While the VA continues to be the largest provider of direct services to homeless veterans, we must ensure that it remains postured to assist the growing number of homeless veterans and veterans at risk for homelessness. To this end, the bill increases the authorization for homeless programs to $150 million.

It also expands and extends a valuable joint VA and Department of Labor program of referral and counseling services, ensures that the VA domiciliary program is capable of meeting the needs of the growing female population, and provides necessary support to low-income veteran families that have made the transition to permanent housing. I want to thank Mr. Murphy and Ms. Herseth Sandlin for their focus on this issue and ensuring that these provisions are in the bill.

Aside from mental health and homelessness, many veterans struggle to cope with chronic and acute pain. This pain lingers long after the physical wounds of war have healed and affects the quality of life of many veterans. Thanks to Mr. Walz of Minnesota's leadership, this bill would require the VA to develop and implement a system-wide policy on pain management.

S. 2162 also improves the health care for certain groups of especially vulnerable populations within the VA. It establishes Epilepsy Centers of Excellence to care for the 89,000 veterans with epilepsy, provides comprehensive health care to children of Vietnam veterans born with spina bifida, and updates VA policies regarding HIV testing. This would not have been possible without the hard work of Mr. Perlmutter of Colorado, Mr. Ellsworth of Indiana, and Mr. Doyle of Pennsylvania.

Next, this bill would reduce the financial burden placed on our veterans. It requires the VA to reimburse veterans for the cost of emergency treatment received in non-VA facilities, prohibits the collection of copayments for all hospice care furnished by the VA, and increases the beneficiary travel mileage reimbursement rate to the current government employee rate. I want to thank Mr. Space of Ohio for his contribution on the emergency treatment provision. And I would like to thank Mr. Miller from Florida for his work on prohibiting copayments for hospice care.

Another challenge facing the VA is rural health. Today, nearly 39 percent of veterans enrolled in the VA health care system live in rural areas. Despite the expansion of community-based outpatient clinics and vet centers, many rural veterans still have problems of access. Thanks to Mr. Moran of Kansas' leadership, this bill requires the VA to conduct a 3-year pilot program in five Veterans Integrated Service Networks to allow highly rural veterans to seek covered health services from non-VA health care providers.

The VA is currently authorized to collect third-party payments from veterans' insurance companies, but due to ineffective procedures, over $1 billion go uncollected annually. This legislation would require the VA to establish no more than seven other Consolidated Patient Account Centers to enable it to improve its billing performance. And I want to recognize and thank my ranking member, Mr. Buyer of Indiana, for his contributions to this issue.

The bill also gives the VA the legal authorities it needs to move forward in major facility construction projects and leases so that it can continue to provide world-class health care to veterans in world- class facilities.

The bill also extends or makes permanent a number of important expiring authorities.

Finally, the bill would name the VA Spinal Cord Injury Center in Tampa, Florida, after our former colleague, Michael Bilirakis. It was through former Congressman Bilirakis' efforts that this center came into being. He served in the Air Force in the 1950s and served in Congress for 24 years. It is fitting that we recognize his efforts in naming the center after him.

I want to recognize and thank Mr. Miller of Florida for his leadership on this issue, and also the younger Mr. Bilirakis from Florida for carrying on his father's tradition.

Mr. Speaker, both Republican and Democratic Members of this committee made major contributions to this bill. And I want to thank the staff from both sides of the aisle for putting together such a comprehensive package. It takes care of the men and women who have given so much to defend this Nation, provides our veterans with the quality health care programs and services they need and they so richly deserve.

I hope my colleagues will support S. 2162, as amended.

Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to yield 4 minutes to an incredibly active and important new Member from New York, John Hall, who chairs our Subcommittee on Disability Assistance and Memorial Affairs. I thank you for all your efforts on behalf of our veterans.

Mr. Speaker, I would recognize another great and new member of our committee, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Hare), also for 4 minutes.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to recognize for 5 minutes the dynamic gentlelady from Florida who has served with me and fought with me for 16 years on this committee, Ms. Brown.

Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Rodriguez), another Member who has served on our committee for almost a decade.

Madam Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on S. 2162, as amended.

Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Madam Speaker, I want to say to Congressman Buyer, the ranking member, and really all the Members on both the Republican and Democrat side of this committee, we have had some ups and downs in this year, but these two bills that we are doing today are great bills. I think we, and I say ``we'' meaning all of us, have a great deal to be proud of. We are going to touch millions of veterans with these bills, millions, and their families, and we are doing it on behalf of people that we know deserve no less.

We have traveled around the country. We have met thousands of veterans in different States. I think both of us get more and more impressed with both the newer veterans and the older veterans and what they have accomplished and how they have carried out their lives. So we are very proud to have worked together to produce these bills.

Joint Explanatory Statement For S. 2162, as Amended

Veterans' Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008

The ``Veterans' Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008'' reflects a compromise agreement that the Senate and House of Representatives' Committees on Veterans' Affairs reached on certain provisions of a number of bills considered by the House and Senate during the 110th Congress, including: S. 2162, to improve the treatment and services provided by the Department of Veterans Affairs to veterans with post-traumatic stress disorder and substance use disorders, and for other purposes, passed by the Senate on June 3, 2008 [hereinafter, ``Senate Bill'']; H.R. 5554, to expand and improve health care services available to veterans from the Department of Veterans Affairs for substance use disorders, and for other purposes, passed by the House on May 20, 2008 [hereinafter, ``House Bill'']; S. 1233, to provide and enhance intervention, rehabilitative treatment, and services to veterans with traumatic brain injury, and for other purposes, placed on the Senate calendar on August 29, 2007.

H.R. 1527, to conduct a pilot program to permit certain highly rural veterans enrolled in the health system of the Department of Veterans Affairs to receive covered health services through providers other than those of the Department, passed by the House on September 10, 2008; H.R. 2623, to prohibit the collection of copayments for all hospice care furnished by the Department of Veterans Affairs, passed by the House on July 30, 2007; H.R. 2818, to provide for the establishment of epilepsy centers of excellence in the Veterans Health Administration of the Department of Veterans Affairs, passed by the House on June 24, 2008; H.R. 2874, to make certain improvements in the provision of health care to veterans, and for other purposes, passed by the House on July 30, 2007; S. 2969, to enhance the capacity of the Department of Veterans Affairs to recruit and retain nurses and other critical health care professionals, and for other purposes, placed on the Senate calendar on September 18, 2008.

H.R. 3819, to reimburse veterans receiving emergency treatment in non-Department of Veterans Affairs facilities for such treatment until such veterans are transferred to Department facilities, and for other purposes, passed by the House on May 21, 2008; H.R. 4264, to name the Department of Veterans Affairs spinal cord injury center in Tampa, Florida, as the ``Michael Bilirakis Department of Veterans Affairs Spinal Cord Injury Center, passed by the House on June 26, 2008; H.R. 5729, to provide comprehensive health care to children of Vietnam veterans born with Spina Bifida, and for other purposes, passed by the House on May 20, 2008; H.R. 6445, to prohibit the Secretary of Veterans Affairs from collecting certain copayments from veterans who are catastrophically disabled, and for other purposes, passed by the House on July 30, 2008; H.R. 6832, to authorize major medical facility projects and major medical facility leases for the Department of Veterans Affairs for fiscal year 2009, to extend certain authorities of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, and for other purposes, passed by the House on September 11, 2008; S. 2969, to enhance the capacity of the Department of Veterans Affairs to recruit and retain nurses and other critical health care professionals and for other purposes, which was placed on the Senate legislative calendar on September 18, 2008.

The House and Senate Committees on Veterans' Affairs have prepared the following explanation of the compromise bill, S. 2162 (hereinafter referred to as the ``Compromise Agreement''). Differences between the provisions contained in the Compromise Agreement and the related provisions in the bills listed above are noted in this document, except for clerical corrections and conforming changes made necessary by the Compromise Agreement, and minor drafting, technical, and clarifying changes.

Title I--Substance Use Disorders and Mental Health Care

Tribute to Justin Bailey (sec. 101)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 306) to specify that this title is enacted in tribute to Justin Bailey, who, after returning to the United States from service as member of the Armed Forces in Operation Iraqi Freedom, died in a domiciliary facility of the Department of Veterans Affairs while receiving care for post-traumatic stress disorder and a substance use disorder.

Section 6 of the House bill contained the identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains this provision.

Findings on Substance Use Disorders and Mental Health (sec. 102)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 301) that would express the sense of the Congress that:

(1) More than 1,500,000 members of the Armed Forces have been deployed in Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom. The 2005 Department of Defense Survey of Health Related Behaviors Among Active Duty Personnel reports that 23 percent of members of the Armed Forces on active duty acknowledge a significant problem with alcohol use, with similar rates of acknowledged problems with alcohol use among members of the National Guard.

(2) The effects of substance abuse are wide ranging, including significantly increased risk of suicide, exacerbation of mental and physical health disorders, breakdown of family support, and increased risk of unemployment and homelessness.

(3) While veterans suffering from mental health conditions, chronic physical illness, and poly trauma may be at increased risk for development of a substance use disorder, treatment for these veterans is complicated by the need to address adequately the physical and mental symptoms associated with these conditions through appropriate medical intervention.

(4) While the Veterans Health Administration has dramatically increased health services for veterans from 1996 through 2006, the number of veterans receiving specialized substance abuse treatment services decreased 18 percent during that time. No comparable decrease in the national rate of substance abuse has been observed during that time.

(5) While some facilities of the Veterans Health Administration provide exemplary substance use disorder treatment services, the availability of such treatment services throughout the health care system of the Veterans Health Administration is inconsistent.

(6) According to the Government Accountability Office, the Department of Veterans Affairs significantly reduced its substance use disorder treatment and rehabilitation services between 1996 and 2006, and has made little progress since in restoring these services to their pre- 1996 levels.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision but modifies finding (6) to include the year of the Government Accountability report and cites the National Mental Health Program Monitoring System report.

Expansion of Substance Use Disorder Treatment Services Provided by the

Department of Veterans Affairs (sec. 103)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 302) that would require that the Secretary of Veterans Affairs ensure the provision of services and treatment to each veteran enrolled in the health care system of the Department who is in need of services and treatments for a substance use disorder, and the bill included a specific list of services. The Senate bill would also authorize that the services and treatments may be provided to a veteran: (1) at Department of Veterans Affairs medical centers or clinics; (2) by referral to other facilities of the Department that are accessible to such veteran; or (3) by contract or fee- for-service payments with community-based organizations for the provision of such services and treatments.

The House bill contained a similar provision (sec. 2) that would require the Secretary to provide a full continuum of care for substance use disorders to veterans in need of such care and included a specific list of services, including three services not included in the Senate bill: marital and family counseling, screening for substance use disorders, and coordination with groups providing peer to peer counseling. The House bill (sec. 3) would also require the Secretary to ensure that the amounts made available for care, treatment, and services are allocated evenly throughout the system, including an annual reporting requirement.

The Compromise Agreement includes the listing of substance use disorder services included in both the Senate and House bills, and follows the Senate bill with respect to the locations of where services would be provided. The Compromise Agreement follows the House bill with respect to ensuring the equitable distribution of resources for substance abuse services but does not include the annual reporting requirement.

Care for Veterans with Mental Health and Substance Use Disorders (sec.

104)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 303) that would ensure that if the Secretary of Veterans Affairs provides a veteran inpatient or outpatient care for a substance use disorder and a comorbid mental health disorder, that the treatment for such disorders be provided concurrently: (1) through a service provided by a clinician or health professional who has training and expertise in treatment of substance use disorders and mental health disorders; (2) by separate substance use disorder and mental health disorder treatment services when there is appropriate coordination, collaboration, and care management between such treatment services; or (3) by a team of clinicians with appropriate expertise.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Pilot Program for Internet-based Substance Use Disorder Treatment for

Veterans of Operation Iraqi Freedom and Operation Enduring Freedom

(sec. 105)

The House bill contained a provision (sec. 4) that would express the sense of the Congress that:

(1) Stigma associated with seeking treatment for mental health disorders has been demonstrated to prevent some veterans from seeking such treatment at a medical facility operated by the Department of Defense or the Department of Veterans Affairs.

(2) There is a significant incidence among veterans of post- deployment mental health problems, especially among members of a reserve component who return as veterans to civilian life.

(3) Computer-based self-guided training has been demonstrated to be an effective strategy for supplementing the care of psychological conditions.

(4) Younger veterans, especially those who served in Operation Enduring Freedom or Operation Iraqi Freedom, are comfortable with and proficient at computer-based technology.

(5) Veterans living in rural areas find access to treatment for substance use disorder limited.

(6) Self-assessment and treatment options for substance use disorders through an Internet website may reduce stigma and provides additional access for individuals seeking care and treatment for such disorders.

This provision would also require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot program to test the feasibility and advisability of providing veterans who seek treatment for substance use disorders access to a computer-based self-assessment, education, and specified treatment program through a secure Internet website operated by the Secretary.

The Senate bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Report on Residential Mental Health Care Facilities of the Veterans

Health Administration (sec. 106)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 305) that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs, acting through the Office of Mental Health Services of the Department of Veterans Affairs, not later than six months after the date of the enactment of this Act, conduct a review of all residential mental health care facilities, including domiciliary facilities, of the Veterans Health Administration; and not later than two years after the date of the completion of the first review conduct a follow-up review of such facilities to evaluate any improvements made or problems remaining since the first review was completed. Not later than 90 days after the completion of the first review, the Secretary would be required to submit to the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the Senate and the Committee on Veterans' Affairs of the House of Representatives a report on such review.

The House bill (sec. 5) contained a similar provision, except there was no provision for a two-year follow-up review, and the six-month review would be carried out by the Office of the Medical Inspector.

The Compromise Agreement includes the Senate provision which specifies the two-year follow-up review, but would have the Inspector General carry out the reviews.

Pilot Program on Peer Outreach and Support for Veterans and Use of

Community Mental Health Centers and Indian Health Service

Facilities (sec. 107)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 401) that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing the following to veterans of OIF/OEF in at least two Veterans Integrated Service Networks: 1) peer outreach services; 2) peer support services provided by licensed providers of peer support services or veterans who have personal experience with mental illness; 3) readjustment counseling services; and other mental health services. Services would be provided through community mental health centers or other entities under contracts or other agreements and through the Indian Health Service pursuant to a memorandum of understanding entered into by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs and the Secretary of Health and Human Services.

Section 6 of H.R. 2874 required the Secretary to carry out a program to provide peer outreach services, peer support services, and readjustment and mental health services to covered veterans. This provision was not a pilot program and did not provide for the means to collaborate with the Indian Health Service.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision with an amendment that would authorize at least three pilot sites.

Title II--Mental Health Research

Research Program on Comorbid Post-traumatic Stress Disorder and

Substance Use Disorders (sec. 201)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 501) that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to carry out a program of research into comorbid post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and substance use disorder. This research program shall be carried out by the National Center for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. In carrying out the program, the Center shall: 1) develop protocols and goals with respect to research under the program; and 2) coordinate research, data collection, and data dissemination under the program.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Extension of Authorization for Special Committee on Post-Traumatic

Stress Disorder (sec. 202)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 502) that would modify section 110(e)(2) of the Veterans' Health Care Act of 1984, P.L. 98- 528, to extend the reporting requirement for the Special Committee on Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder. Currently, the reporting requirement is set to expire in 2008; this provision would extend it through 2012.

Section 209 of H.R. 6832 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Title III--Assistance for Families of Veterans

Clarification of Authority of Secretary of Veterans Affairs to Provide

Mental Health Services to Families of Veterans (sec. 301)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 601) that would amend section 1701(5)(B) of title 38, United States Code, to clarify the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide mental health services to families of veterans.

Section 3 of H.R. 6445 contained a provision that would modify section 1782(b) of title 38 so as to eliminate the requirement that family support services be initiated during the veteran's hospitalization and deemed essential to permit the veteran's discharge.

The Compromise Agreement follows the House bill with respect to the provision eliminating the need for services to be initiated during a veteran's hospitalization and essential to the veteran's discharge, but follows the Senate bill with respect to the provision to clarify the authority of the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to provide mental health services to families.

Pilot Program on Provision of Readjustment and Transition Assistance to

Veterans and Their Families in Cooperation with Vet Centers (sec.

302)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 402) that would establish a pilot program to assess the feasibility and advisability of providing additional readjustment and transition assistance to veterans and their families in cooperation with Readjustment Counseling Centers. The pilot would be similar to family assistance programs previously conducted at ten Army facilities around the country.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision with an amendment to begin the pilot program no later than 180 days after the enactment of the Act.

Title IV--Health Care Matters

Veterans Beneficiary Travel Program (sec. 401)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 101) that would direct the Secretary to reimburse qualifying veterans at the rate authorized for Government employees under section 5707(b) of title 5. The Senate provision would also strike a provision that allows the Secretary to raise or lower the deductible for reimbursements in proportion to a change in the mileage rate. Finally, the Senate provision would reinstate the amount of the deductible for the beneficiary travel reimbursement program to the amount in effect prior to the Secretary's February 1, 2008, decision on beneficiary travel.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Mandatory Reimbursement of Veterans Receiving Emergency Treatment in

Non-Department of Veterans Affairs Facilities until Transfer to

Department Facilities (sec. 402)

The Senate bill contained a provision that would amend section 1725 of title 38 in subsections (a)(1) and (f)(1). Subsection (a)(1) would be amended by replacing `may reimburse' with `shall reimburse.' This change would make reimbursement for emergency care received at non-VA facilities mandatory for eligible veterans, rather than at the discretion of the Secretary. Subsection (f)(1) would be amended to provide greater specificity regarding the termination of VA's obligation to reimburse. The Senate bill would also amend section 1728 of title 38 so as to make that section, which relates to reimbursement for the emergency treatment of service-connected conditions, consistent with section 1725, as amended. Thus, reimbursement would also be made mandatory under Section 1728. The existing criteria, defining veteran eligibility for reimbursement for emergency care services, would be carried over in the revised statutory language. In addition, the Senate bill would further amend section 1728 so as to strike the phrase `care and services' in current subsection (b) of section 1728, and replace that phrase with `emergency treatment.' This proposed change is designed to promote consistency between sections 1725 and 1728.

H.R. 3819 contained similar provisions.

The Compromise Agreement contains these provisions.

Pilot Program of Enhanced Contract Care Authority for Health Care Needs

of Veterans in Highly Rural Areas (sec. 403)

H.R. 1527 (sec. 2) would require the Secretary to conduct a pilot program which permits highly rural veterans who are enrolled in the system of patient enrollment established under section 1705(a) of title 38, and who reside in Veterans Integrated Service Networks (VISNs) 1, 15, 18, and 19, to elect to receive covered health services for which such veterans are eligible, through a non-Department health care provider.

The Senate bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement follows the House bill, with an amendment that specifies that the pilot program will be carried out in 5 VISNs, four of which shall include at least three highly rural counties (as determined by the Secretary based upon the most recent census data), and one of which shall include one highly rural county. All VISNs selected must include an area within the borders of at least four states, and not be already participating in Project HERO. Eligibility for participation in the pilot program would be limited to those veterans already enrolled in the VA health care system at the time of commencement of the program, as well as OIF/OEF veterans who are eligible for VA health care under section 1710(e)(3)(C) of title 38.

Epilepsy Centers of Excellence (sec. 404)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 103) that would require that the Secretary, upon the recommendation of the Under Secretary for Health, designate not less than six Department health care facilities as locations for epilepsy centers of excellence.

H.R. 2818 (sec. 2) would require the Secretary to designate an epilepsy center of excellence at each of the 5 centers designated under section 7327 of title 38 (Centers for research, education, and clinical activities on complex multi-trauma associated with combat injuries).

The Compromise Agreement specifies that the Secretary shall designate at least four but not more than six Department health care facilities as locations for epilepsy centers of excellence. Not less than two of these centers shall be collocated with centers designated under 7327 of title 38.

Establishment of Qualifications for Peer Specialist Appointees (sec.

405)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 104) that would amend section 7402(b) of title 38 so as to define qualifications for peer specialist positions employed by the Veterans Health Administration. Specifically, in order to be eligible to be appointed to a peer specialist position, a person must be a veteran who has recovered or is recovering from a mental health condition; and be certified by a not- for-profit entity engaged in peer specialist training by having met such criteria as the Secretary shall establish for a peer specialist position; or a State by having satisfied relevant State requirements for a peer specialist position. The Senate bill would also amend section 7402 of title 38 so as to add a new subsection providing authority for the Secretary to enter into contracts with not-for-profit entities to provide peer specialist training to veterans and certification for veterans.

The House bill contained no similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Establishment of Consolidated Patient Accounting Centers (sec. 406)

Section 5 of H.R. 6445 contained a provision that would amend chapter 17 of title 38 to insert a new section mandating that not later than 5 years after the date of enactment of this bill, the Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall establish not more than seven consolidated patient accounting centers for conducting industry-modeled regionalized billing and collection activities of the Department.

The Senate bill contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Repeal of Limitation on Authority to Conduct Widespread HIV Testing

Program (sec. 407)Section 217 of S. 2969 would repeal section 124 of Public Law 100-322, which permits VA to test a patient for HIV infection only if the veteran receives pre-test counseling and provides written informed consent for such testing. Eliminating this section from the law would bring VA's statutory HIV testing requirements in line with current guidelines issued by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Section 6 of H.R. 6445 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Provision of Comprehensive Health Care by Secretary of Veterans Affairs

to Children of Vietnam Veterans Born with Spina Bifida (sec. 408)

H.R. 5729 would amend section 1803(a) of title 38 so as to expand the existing VA Spina Bifida Health Care Program and provide a comprehensive health benefit to beneficiaries.

The Senate bill contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Exemption from Copayment Requirement for Veterans Receiving Hospice

Care (sec. 409)

Section 309 of S. 1233 would amend section 1710 of title 38 so as to exempt hospice care provided in all settings from the copayment requirement for VA long-term care. Under current law, only hospice care provided in a VA nursing home is exempted from copayment.

H.R. 2623 contained a similar provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Title V--Pain Care

Comprehensive Policy on Pain Management (sec. 501)

The Senate bill contained a provision (sec. 201) that would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to develop and implement a comprehensive policy on the management of pain experienced by veterans enrolled for VA health care services no later than October 1, 2008.

The policy would be required to cover the following: the Department- wide management of acute and chronic pain experienced by veterans; the standard of care for pain management to be used throughout the Department; the consistent application of pain assessments to be used throughout the Department; the assurance of prompt and appropriate pain care treatment and management by the Department, system-wide, when medically necessary; Department programs of research related to acute and chronic pain suffered by veterans, including pain attributable to central and peripheral nervous system damage characteristic of injuries incurred in modern warfare; Department programs of pain care education and training for health care personnel of the Department; and Department programs of patient education for veterans suffering from acute or chronic pain and their families.

Section 4 of H.R. 6445 contained identical provisions.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provisions, but would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to develop and implement a comprehensive policy on pain management no later than October 1, 2009.

Title VI--Homeless Veterans Matters

Increase in Authorization of Appropriations for the Homeless Grant and

Per Diem Program (sec. 601)

Section 506 of S. 2969 would amend section 2013 of title 38, to increase the authorization of appropriations for the Homeless Grant and Per Diem Program from $130 million to $200 million.

The House bill contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision but changes the authorization amount to $150 million.

Expansion and Extension of Authority for Program of Referral and

Counseling Services for At-risk Veterans Transitioning from Certain

Institutions (sec. 602)

Section 403 of S. 1233 would amend section 2023 of title 38 so as to extend and expand the authority for a program to aid incarcerated veterans in their transition back to civilian life. The program would be extended until September 30, 2011, and would be expanded from six to twelve sites.

Section 7 of H.R. 2874 contained identical provisions.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision, but would extend the program until September 30, 2012.

Permanent Authority for Domiciliary Services for Homeless Veterans and

Enhancement of Capacity of Domiciliary Care Programs for Female

Veterans (sec. 603)

Section 405 of S. 1233 would amend section 2043 of title 38 to make permanent an existing authority to expand domiciliary care for homeless women veterans.

Section 8 of H.R. 2874 contained identical provisions.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provisions.

Financial Assistance for Supportive Services for Very-low Income

Veteran Families in Permanent Housing (sec. 604)

Section 406 of S. 1233 would amend title 38 so as to add a new section 2044, relating to supportive services for very low-income veterans and their families occupying permanent housing. Proposed new section 2044 would direct VA to provide grants to eligible entities to provide and coordinate the provision of a comprehensive range of supportive services for very low-income veteran families occupying permanent housing, including those transitioning from homelessness to such housing.

Those families may be occupying permanent housing, moving into permanent housing within 90 days, or moving from one permanent residence to another to better suit their needs. Entities eligible to receive grants under this provision are public or private non-profit organizations which have demonstrated the capacity and experience necessary to deliver the services outlined in the proposed new section. Under the provisions of the proposed new section 2044, grants would be provided for a wide range of services, so as to give families a broad set of tools to maintain a permanent residence. To this end, providers could receive grants to furnish outreach, case management, assistance in obtaining and coordinating VA benefits, and assistance in obtaining and coordinating other public benefits provided by federal, state, or local agencies or organizations.

Section 9 of H.R. 2874 contained similar provisions but provided a more expansive list of supportive services, and authorized for appropriations a different funding level.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Title VII--Authorization of Medical Facility Projects and Major Medical

Facility Leases

Authorization for Fiscal Year 2009 Major Medical Facility Projects

(sec. 701)

Section 701 of S. 2969 would authorize:

$54,000,000 to construct a facility to replace a seismically unsafe acute psychiatric inpatient building in Palo Alto, California.

$131,800,000 for an outpatient clinic in Lee County, Florida.

$225,900,000 to make seismic corrections at a VA Medical Center in San Juan, Puerto Rico.

$66,000,000 to construct a state-of-the-art polytrauma health care and rehabilitation center in San Antonio, Texas.

Section 101 of H.R. 6832 contained the same provisions, except for Lee County, Florida. Instead, H.R. 6832 authorizes the Lee County project under a different section.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Modification of Authorization Amounts for Certain Major Medical

Facility Construction Projects Previously Authorized (sec. 702)

Section 702 of S. 2969 would modify previous authorizations by providing $625,000,000 for restoration, new construction, or replacement of the medical care facility for the VA Medical Center at New Orleans, Louisiana.

Section 102 of H.R. 6832 contained the same provisions and the following additional provisions:

$769,200,000 for the replacement of the VA Medical Center at Denver, Colorado.

$131,800,000 for an outpatient clinic in Lee County, Florida.

$136,700,000 to correct patient privacy deficiencies at the VA Medical Center in Gainesville, Florida.

$600,400,000 to build a new VA Medical Center in Las Vegas, Nevada.

$656,800,000 to build a new medical center in Orlando, Florida.

$295,600,000 to consolidate the campuses at the University Drive and H. John Heinz III Divisions in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision with an amendment to provide $568,000,000 for the replacement of the VA Medical Center at Denver, Colorado.

Authorization of Fiscal Year 2009 Major Medical Facility Leases (sec.

703)

Section 703 of S. 2969 would authorize fiscal year 2009 major medical facility leases as follows:

$4,326,000 for an outpatient clinic in Brandon, Florida.

$10,300,000 for a community-based outpatient clinic in Colorado Springs, Colorado.

$5,826,000 for an outpatient clinic in Eugene, Oregon.

$5,891,000 to expand an outpatient clinic in Green Bay, Wisconsin.

$3,731,000 for an outpatient clinic in Greenville, South Carolina.

$2,212,000 for a community-based outpatient clinic in Mansfield, Ohio.

$6,276,000 for a satellite outpatient clinic in Mayaguez, Puerto Rico.

$5,106,000 for a community-based outpatient clinic in Southeast Phoenix, Mesa, Arizona.

$8,636,000 for interim research space in Palo Alto, California.

$3,168,000 to expand a community-based outpatient clinic in Savannah, Georgia.

$2,295,000 for a community-based outpatient clinic in Northwest Phoenix, Sun City, Arizona.

$8,652,000 for a primary care annex in Tampa, Florida.

Section 102 of H.R. 6832 included the same provisions, except that it provided $3,995,000 for Colorado Springs.

The Compromise Agreement includes the Senate provisions.

Authorization of Appropriations (sec. 704)

Section 704 of S. 2969 would authorize for appropriations:

$477,700,000 for the aforementioned list of major medical facility projects authorized for fiscal year 2009.

$625,000,000 for the aforementioned list of major medical facility construction projects previously authorized.

$66,419,000 for the aforementioned list of major facility leases authorized for fiscal year 2009.

S. 2969 also identified funding sources which may be used to carry out major medical facility projects authorized for fiscal year 2009 and for those projects previously authorized.

Section 105 of H.R. 6832 would authorize for appropriations:

$345,900,000 for the aforementioned list of major medical facility projects authorized for fiscal year 2009.

$1,694,295,000 for the aforementioned list of major medical facility construction projects previously authorized.

$54,475,000 for the aforementioned list of major facility leases authorized for fiscal year 2009.

The Compromise Agreement includes the House provision, with amendments to provide $1,493,495,000 for major facility construction projects previously authorized and $70,019,000 for major facility leases authorized for fiscal year 2009. The Agreement also includes the provision in S. 2969 on allowable funding sources to carry out major medical facility projects.

Increase in Threshold for Major Medical Facility Leases Requiring

Congressional Approval (sec. 705)

Section 705 of S. 2969 would increase the threshold for major medical facility leases requiring Congressional approval from $600,000 to $1,000,000.

H.R. 6832 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Conveyance of Certain Non-Federal Land by City of Aurora, Colorado, to

Secretary of Veterans Affairs for Construction of Veterans Medical

Facility (sec. 706)

Section 706 of S. 2969 would allow the city of Aurora to donate non- Federal land for use by the Secretary of Veterans Affairs no later than 60 days after the enactment of this section.

H.R. 6832 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the Senate provision.

Report on facilities administration (sec. 707)

Section 106 of H.R. 6832 would require the Secretary of Veterans Affairs to submit a report on facilities administration no later than 60 days after the date of the enactment of this section.

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision

The Compromise Agreement includes the House provision.

Annual report on outpatient clinics (sec. 708)

Section 107 of H.R. 6832 would require an annual report on outpatient clinics no later than the date on which the budget for the next fiscal year is submitted to the Congress under section 1105 of title 31.

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement includes the House provision.

Name of Department of Veterans Affairs Spinal Cord Injury Center,

Tampa, Florida (sec. 709)

H.R. 4264 would name the VA spinal cord injury center in Tampa Florida, ``Michael Bilirakis Department of Veterans Affairs Spinal Cord Injury Center.''

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement includes the House provision.

Title VIII--Extension of Certain Authorities

Repeal of Sunset on Inclusion of Non-institutional Extended Care

Services in Definition of Medical Services (sec. 801)

Section 201 of S. 2969 would amend section 1701 of title 38 to repeal the December 31, 2008, sunset on the inclusion of non-institutional extended care services in the definition of medical services.

Sec. 201 of H.R. 6832 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Extension of Recovery Audit Authority (sec. 802)

Section 202 of S. 2969 would amend section 1703(d)(4) of title 38 to extend the recovery audit authority for fee-basis contracts and other medical services contracts in non-VA facilities from September 30, 2008, to September 30, 2013.

Sec. 202 of H.R. 6832 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Permanent Authority for Provision of Hospital Care, Medical Services,

and Nursing Home Care to Veterans who Participated in Certain

Chemical and Biological Testing Conducted by the Department of

Defense (sec. 803)

Section 203 of S. 2969 would amend subsection (e)(3) of section 1710 of title 38 to provide permanent authority for the provision of hospital care, medical services, and nursing home care to veterans who participated in certain chemical and biological testing conducted by the Department of Defense.

Section 203 of H.R. 6832 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Extension of Expiring Collections Authorities (sec. 804)

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision.

Section 204 of H.R. 6832 would extend the expiring collections authorities for the following: a) amend section 1710(f)(2)(B) of title 38 to extend health care copayments from September 30, 2008, under current law, to September 30, 2010; and b) amend section 1729 (a)(2)(E) of title 38 to extend the medical care cost recovery from October 1, 2008, to October 1, 2010.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Extension of Nursing Home Care (sec. 805)

Section 202 of S. 2969 would amend 1710A(d) of title 38 to provide nursing home care to veterans with service-connected disability, which expires on December 31, 2008, to December 31, 2013.

Section 205 of H.R. 6832 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Permanent Authority to Establish Research Corporations (sec. 806)

Section 607 of S. 2969 would strike section 7368 of title 38 to provide permanent authority to establish research corporations

Section 207 of H.R. 6832 contained an identical provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the provision.

Extension of Requirement to Submit Annual Report on the Committee on

Care of Severely Chronically Mentally Ill Veterans (sec. 807)

Section 210 of H.R. 6832 would amend section 7321(d)(2) of title 38 to extend the requirement to submit an annual report on the committee on care of severely chronically mentally ill veterans through 2012.

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Permanent Requirement for Biannual Report on Women's Advisory Committee

(sec. 808)

Section 211 of H.R. 6832 would amend section 542(c)(1) of title 38 to provide for a permanent requirement for a biannual report by the women's advisory committee on the needs of women veterans including compensation, health care, rehabilitation, outreach, and other benefits and programs administered by the VA.

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Extension of Pilot Program on Improvement of Caregiver Assistance

Services (sec. 809)

Section 222 of S. 2969 would extend the pilot program on improvement of caregiver assistance services for a three-year period through fiscal year 2009.

H.R. 6832 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement includes the Senate provision.

Title IX--Other Matters

Technical Amendments (sec. 901)

Section 303 of H.R. 6832 would provide for technical amendments for the following sections of title 38: 1712A; 2065(b)(3)(C); 4110(c)(1); 7458(b)(2); 8117(a)(1); 1708(d); 7314(f); 7320(j)(2); 7325(i)(2); and 7328(i)(2). It also would provide for technical amendments to the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 36 and chapter 51, as well as amend section 807(e) of the Veterans Benefits, Health Care, and Information Technology Act of 2006 (Public Law 109-461) to replace the phrase `Medical Care' with `Medical Facilities.'

S. 2969 contained no comparable provision.

The Compromise Agreement contains the House provision.

Madam Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, of the 30 minutes yielded to me by the gentleman from Minnesota, I would ask unanimous consent to yield 10 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona so that he may manage that time as a part of the debate.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 3 minutes.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of the farm bill, and the words before me say ``the very same farm bill passed by this body last week with an overwhelming bipartisan majority.'' Now we find that it is not quite the same farm bill because of an enrolling error or something in the transmission of the document. I certainly hope that we can find an amicable way to make sure that the trade title of this bill, which is an important title, is included in the final product, whether as a part of a joint resolution or by some other means of adopting that.

This bill was a collaborative effort, crafted by Members on both sides of the aisle and both sides of the Capitol, and is historic in the amount and degree of reform. It costs less than either the House or the Senate bills and ensures Americans will continue to enjoy access to a safe, affordable, and reliable food supply.

Last week, the 318 bipartisan votes in favor of the farm bill sent a clear message: This is a good bill and there is significant support for it. Despite what has been opined by editorial boards throughout the country, this bill contains significant reforms and is the most reform- minded farm bill this body has ever considered. Granted, everyone didn't get exactly what they wanted. We all gave a little and we all got a little. But such is the nature of compromise. Given the diverse nature of a farm bill, it is extremely difficult to manage the scope of needs within the farm bill, and even more difficult when you're not given the resources needed to do so.

This bill contains many of the ideas suggested in the administration's farm bill proposal. Like the administration, we utilized the adjusted gross income to reduce payments to the wealthiest farmers and ranchers. We eliminated the three-entity rule, created a revenue-base countercyclical program, modified and modernized the dairy program, modified planting flexibility rules, increased the efficiency of the crop insurance program, directed funding to the development of cellulosic ethanol, included programs for beginning and socially disadvantaged farmers, and created beneficial interest for the loan programs.

Variations of these measures were included in the administration's proposal. We may not have gone as far as the administration wanted, but these reforms help make this a better bill than the House or Senate farm bills.

It is important to point out that despite comments to the contrary, this bill is completely paid for, without any tax increases. While many throughout the world are feeling the effects of increased food prices, U.S. consumers have been largely insulated from spikes in food prices because many years ago we established a food production system that maintains an adequate supply in good times and in bad. Because it is produced domestically, we know it to be safe and affordable.

This bill ensures that Americans will continue to enjoy the access to a safe, affordable, and reliable food supply, and I urge my colleagues to join me in supporting this farm bill, which moved substantially in the direction that the President asked for, but which did not meet all of his goals. I think we have increased the support for this bill substantially by almost 90 Members in the process, and I urge my colleagues to support this override vote.

Mr. Speaker, it is my pleasure to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Neugebauer), a subcommittee ranking member.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 30 seconds to respond to the gentleman from Arizona about the ACRE program. This is a program that was requested by the administration. It was modified by the House and modified by the Senate. Now we hear the administration doesn't like the way it is projected to work, but, quite frankly, it scores by the Congressional Budget Office as saving the taxpayers of our country $400 million.

Why? Because the fact of the matter is it is not expected to have a very high enrollment, and in order to have what the gentleman describe take place, we would have to have a dramatic drop in corn prices. But the administration just signed into law in December a bill that mandates ever-increasing costs of amounts of production for ethanol, and the fact of the matter is we are not going to see those conditions. It is a theoretical possibility, a practical unlikely condition.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Louisiana (Mr. Boustany).

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentlewoman from Colorado (Mrs. Musgrave).

Mr. Speaker, at this time it is my pleasure to yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Kuhl).

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Conaway).

Mr. Speaker, at this time it is my pleasure to yield 1\1/2\ minutes to the gentleman from Oklahoma, a ranking member on the Agriculture Subcommittee, Mr. Lucas.

Mr. Speaker, at this time I am pleased to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Fortenberry), a member of the Agriculture Committee.

Mr. Speaker, may I ask how much time remains.

Mr. Speaker, at this time it is my pleasure to yield 2 minutes to the distinguished Member from Missouri, a real advocate for agriculture, Mr. Hulshof.

(Mr. HULSHOF asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself 2 minutes.

Mr. Speaker, a lot has been said here today about the bipartisan nature of this legislation, but when it passed the House last week, a majority on both sides of the aisle voted for this farm bill, and three-quarters of all of the Members here did so. But we did so because there are provisions in this bill that are of interest to each side of the aisle, and sometimes there are very clear partisan differences.

But nonetheless, the Republican side of the aisle received a number of concessions in the final negotiations of this bill: a provision that would have prohibited all 50 State food stamp programs to be able to reach out to technology companies and others to modernize and improve their food stamp program, something they have done many times in the recent past. A prohibition on that was removed from the bill. A provision in the bill that would have rolled back the Welfare Reform Act of 1996 and provided increased food stamps for able-bodied adults without dependent children was removed from the bill. Provisions related to the Davis-Bacon legislation that many Members on my side of the aisle, including myself, were concerned about were removed from the bill.

So this is a bipartisan bill because it was compromise and give-and- take on both sides of the aisle.

I have also heard Members complain that this bill is not fiscally responsible. It's less than the last farm bill. It is less than either the House-passed

version of the bill or the Senate-passed version of the bill: $4 billion less than the House, $5 billion less than the Senate version. I ask any Member here in the House, when was the last time they recall that a bill came back from a conference between the House and the Senate and spent less money than either the House or Senate spent?

And I would give you this overall picture. Americans spend about $1.2 trillion a year on food. The provisions in this bill related to the commodity title, the safety net for America's farmers and ranchers, is about $7 billion or slightly less than one-half of 1 percent of what Americans spend on food.

I yield myself an additional 30 seconds.

Now for that one-half cent on every dollar, Americans get the stability and safety of their food supply and the assurance that they will not see in the United States what they're seeing in other countries around the world which do not have a good farm program for their farmers that assure their consumers that they will get an adequate, safe, and affordable supply of food. They do not see food riots in the United States.

They see, instead, those in the greatest need receiving appropriate food programs and the average American being able to spend less than 9 percent of their income on food. That is lower than any other country in the world today or any other country in the history of the world.

This farm bill helps to promote those good policies. I urge my colleagues to support the override.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.

I urge my colleagues to vote to override this veto, but I would like to close my remarks by commending the President of the United States and his administration for their involvement in this process. They have improved this farm bill considerably from the versions that were passed in the House and the Senate. In fact, I'm going to yield a portion of my time to the leader.

But I want to say that this includes more than 90 provisions that the President of the United States, the leaders in the Department of Agriculture and others, suggested to us to reform. And there are numerous reforms in this legislation that are very, very substantial, very, very significant. They would not have occurred without the President's active involvement and support for efforts to improve this farm bill.

This farm bill is dramatically reformed from previous farm bills, and as a result of his involvement, of involvement on both sides of the aisle, this farm bill is dramatically improved. As a result, the Republican Members on this side of the aisle went from 17 Members supporting the bill when it came out of the Agriculture Committee to 100 Members supporting it when we voted for it last week.

There is much to commend in this bill. The President has asked for additional reforms. I supported him in the efforts to obtain some of those reforms, but we could not achieve every single objective that he sought because this is a bipartisan bill that includes the considerations of a wide array of viewpoints.

But I will say that this side of the aisle was well represented in this process and thanks in part to the efforts of the administration.

Notwithstanding that, the bill is a good bill, and we would urge our colleagues to support it.

At this time, I yield the balance of my time to the Republican leader, the gentleman from Ohio.

Mr. President, I rise today to urge swift Senate passage of S. 2162, the proposed Veterans' Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008, as amended. This is an omnibus health care measure, which responds to the burgeoning mental health concerns of veterans and their families. The bill, as it comes before the Senate, is a compromise agreement developed with our counterparts on the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs. I thank Chairman Filner and Ranking Member Buyer of the House committee for their cooperation in this endeavor. I also thank my good friend, the committee's ranking member, Senator Burr, for his great energy and cooperation as we have developed this bill.

This compromise agreement is also focused on addressing homelessness among veterans, increasing VA's efforts on pain management, promoting excellence in VA's efforts relating to epilepsy, and improving access to care in rural areas. It also includes a series of necessary programmatic authorization extensions as well as major medical facility construction authorizations.

The framework for this bill is my legislation, S. 2162 as originally introduced. This bill represents a bipartisan approach and was cosponsored early on by the ranking member, Senator Burr, along with Senators Mikulski, Ensign, Rockefeller, Smith, Bingaman, Dole, Clinton, Collins, Sessions, and Stevens.

Mr. President, I want to share how we began this process. The legislation did not stem from a lobbyist or an interest group. It came about because of one letter--a letter to me from the parents of Justin Bailey--Mary Kaye and Tony Bailey.

Justin Bailey was a war veteran who survived Iraq only to die while receiving care from VA for PTSD and substance use disorder. A week after his death last year, Justin's parents were naturally heartbroken by the death of their only son, but even more than that, they were concerned that other veterans might share his fate if VA mental health care did not improve.

In their own words, they asked, ``Everyone talks about the costs of sending troops to Iraq--what about the cost of caring for their injuries, both physical and psychological, when they return?''

From this first letter, the Committee on Veterans' Affairs held various hearings on the mental health needs of veterans. The media carried so many stories of veterans who were suffering, and various studies showed how prevalent mental health difficulties are in those who return from duty in Iraq and Afghanistan.

We worked with experts in the mental health field and others who were advocating for veterans, including those at the Disabled American Veterans, to craft a bill that responded to the problem. This legislation responds to the concerns of the Baileys and many others who have come to the committee to tell their stories, and does so with the clear understanding that veterans care is a cost of war. If we neglect to pay these costs when the service members first return from deployment, we as a nation will suffer incalculable human costs that can never be repaid.

Provisions included in this compromise agreement are drawn from various bills which have all been reported favorably by the Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs, including S. 1233 as ordered reported on August 29, 2007; S. 2004, S. 2142, S. 2160, S. 2162, as ordered reported on November 14, 2007; and S. 2969, as ordered reported on June 26, 2008.

I will briefly outline some of the key provisions in the compromise agreement.

This legislation would make comprehensive changes to VA mental health treatment and research. Most notably, it would ensure a minimum level of substance use disorder care for veterans who need such care. It would also require VA to improve treatment of veterans with PTSD co- occurring with substance use disorders. Additionally, in order to determine if VA's residential mental health facilities are appropriately staffed, this bill would mandate a review of such facilities. It would also create a vital research program on PTSD and substance use disorders, in cooperation with, and building on the work of, the National Center for PTSD.

It is not uncommon for veterans with physical and mental wounds to turn to drugs and alcohol to ease their pain. Many experts believe that stress is the primary cause of drug abuse and of relapse to drug abuse. Sixty to eighty percent of Vietnam veterans who have sought PTSD treatment have alcohol use disorders. VA has long dealt with substance abuse issues, but there is much more that can be done. This legislation would provide a number of solutions to enhance substance use disorder treatment, including an innovative approach to substance use treatment via Internet-based programs.

Furthermore, the inclusion of families in mental health and substance use disorder treatment is critical. To that end, the compromise agreement would fully authorize VA to provide mental health services to families of veterans and would set up a program to proactively help veterans and their families to transition from deployment to civilian life.

Beneficiary travel reimbursements are essential to improving access to VA health care for veterans in rural areas. This legislation would increase the beneficiary travel mileage reimbursement rate from 11 cents per mile to 28.5 cents per mile and permanently set the deductible to the 2007 amount of $3 each way. Senator Tester has been a leader on this issue, and I thank him for that.

Too often, veterans suffer from lack of care not only because they reside in rural areas but also because they are unaware of the services available to them. This legislation would enhance outreach and accessibility by creating a pilot program on the use of peers to help reach out to veterans. It would also encourage improved accessibility for mental health care in rural areas through coordination with community-based resources. Mental Health America and Iraq and Afghanistan Veterans of America brought to the committee the concept of using peers to help veterans, and I think it is a good one.

It is crucial that all veterans have access to emergency care. This bill would make corrections to the procedure used by VA to reimburse community hospitals for emergency care provided to eligible veterans to ensure that both veterans and community hospitals are not unduly burdened by emergency care costs. This provision is based on legislation introduced by Senator Brown in response to a situation in his own State of Ohio, where community hospitals were not being reimbursed timely from VA.

The compromise agreement also addresses homelessness among veterans, a far too prevalent problem. The bill would create targeted programs to provide assistance for low-income veteran families. It would also increase the total amount that VA is authorized to spend on its successful Grant and Per Diem Program, which assists community-based entities that serve homeless veterans. Finally, the bill would expand a program to help formerly incarcerated veterans reintegrate into life and ensure facilities are up to par for women veterans who are homeless.

Epilepsy is often associated with traumatic brain injury. This legislation would establish six VA epilepsy centers of excellence, focused on research, education, and clinical care activities in the diagnosis and treatment of epilepsy. These centers would restore VA to the position of leadership it once held in epilepsy research and treatment. Senators Murray and Craig worked together to bring this critical legislation to the forefront. I also add that the Epilepsy Foundation of America and the American Academy of Neurology were very helpful to the committee on this issue.

The medical community has made impressive advances in pain care and management, but VA has lagged behind in implementing a standardized policy. S. 2162 would establish a pain care program at all VA inpatient facilities, to prevent long-term chronic pain disability. It also provides for education for VA's health care workers on pain assessment and treatment and would require VA to expand research on pain care. We relied on the Pain Care Forum and their many organizations devoted to the relief of pain, and I thank them for their efforts on behalf of veterans.

Finally, S. 2162 contains extensions of authorities for VA to provide some essential services to veterans, such as both institutional and non-institutional long-term care and caregiver assistance. It would also authorize a series of major medical facility construction projects and clinic leases in California, Texas, Puerto Rico, Florida, Louisiana, Colorado, Nevada, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, South Carolina, Ohio, Arizona, Georgia, and Illinois.

Mr. President, before I close, I recognize and thank the individuals involved in putting together this comprehensive measure. Specifically, I thank Cathy Wiblemo and Dolores Dunn from the House committee and Jon Towers from the minority on the Senate committee. I also thank my own staff who assisted me in forging this bill. Kim Lipsky and Alex Sardegna heard the needs of veterans, sought creative solutions to some very complex problems, and worked tirelessly to make this bill a reality.

In closing, I thank Mary Kaye and Tony Bailey, who set aside their own grief about Justin and fought for better mental health care for all veterans. We all owe the Baileys a debt of gratitude for so many reasons.

I urge all of my colleagues to support swift passage of S. 2162, as amended. It would bring relief, support, and needed services to so many veterans and their families across the country.

I ask unanimous consent to have the Joint Explanatory Statement printed in the Record.

Mr. Speaker, for purposes of debate only, I yield 30 minutes to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Goodlatte) and further would yield 10 minutes of my time to the gentleman from Wisconsin (Mr. Kind) and ask unanimous consent that he may control that time.

I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I ask my colleagues to listen up here because this has been a very difficult bill and there has been numerous problems that have developed every day for the last year-and-a-half. I guess it's appropriate that there would be a problem that would be developing today as well.

When the enrolling clerk enrolled the bill to send to the White House, somehow or another they inadvertently, or however it happened, did not include the trade title, title III of the bill, in the official documents that went to the White House. So the President vetoed the bill minus the trade title, title III.

The trade title includes the food aid programs, including McGovern- Dole; it includes the market promotion; the export credit program; the market access program, and it also includes the soft wood lumber certification program.

So we are moving ahead to override the veto that the President has done. But we have this issue that one of the titles is missing from the bill. We have a process after we get through the override to try to deal with that issue.

Mr. Speaker, the President's veto message said that when the commodity prices are high, it's irresponsible to increase government subsidy rates for 15 crops and subsidize additional crops and so forth. We made some adjustments in some of the price supports to try to rebalance the system from what it has been in the past. These were modest, and I think it's questionable that you would use this as one of the items in the veto override.

As I have worked through this process, I spent more time than anybody else talking to the White House, trying to avoid the situation we are in today, where the President has vetoed this bill. I don't know that anybody else has spent more time trying to work with the White House. The problem has been that they keep changing the objections to the bill, and 2 or 3 weeks ago, when we tried to engage the White House to be able to work with them in a negotiating fashion to take into consideration some of their concerns, their position was that, well, they had these demands but they really weren't in a position or willing to negotiate with us.

So we have come to this day where the White House has vetoed this bill,

which I regret. But we have a good bill that I think all of us should be proud of. It maintains a safety net for farmers, by and large, in the way it was done in the 2002 bill. We did make some changes; reductions in crop insurance and some other areas. We included a new disaster program that is paid for, that would be an unusual situation because generally the disaster ad hocs that we have done have not been paid for. So we think we have made some improvements in area.

We responded to the concern of people around the country of food costs and the way food prices have gone up by taking all of the new money, the whole $10 billion of new money that was put into the bill over and above the baseline and we have put that into nutrition programs. $10.364 billion in this bill was put into nutrition programs. That includes modernizing and indexing food stamps; $1.25 billion for food shelves and food banks that are basically bare right now; and also a new fruit and vegetable snack program for folks in low-income schools so that our kids can have healthy snacks and have an alternative to some of the things that they are now snacking on. We also made some changes, as I said, in the commodity area so that we could improve substantially conservation. We have added a specialty crop title to this bill, and we have also added an energy title to this bill.

So we have responded to what we heard when we traveled the country under the leadership of then-Chairman Goodlatte. We have responded to all of the areas. We think we have a bill that is responsible, that is paid for without tax increases, that puts the priorities where they need to be in this country.

I would ask my colleagues to follow up on the good vote that we had last Wednesday on the bill when it was on the floor and give us the majority today to override the President's veto.

With that, I would reserve the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the distinguished vice chairman of our committee and also the chairman of the Subcommittee on Conservation, Credit, Energy, and Research, Mr. Holden from Pennsylvania.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to the distinguished chairman of the Department Operations, Oversight, Nutrition, and Forestry Subcommittee, who did such an outstanding job in putting the much needed nutrition title together, Mr. Baca from California.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased now to yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from California, the chairman of the Horticulture and Organic Agriculture Subcommittee who brought us the first specialty crop title to the farm bill, Mr. Cardoza of California.

Mr. Speaker, I am now pleased to recognize an outstanding member of our conference committee, also a member of the Ag Committee, the gentleman from Georgia (Mr. Scott).

Mr. Speaker, I would like to yield 1 minute to the distinguished gentleman from North Dakota (Mr. Pomeroy) who is a member of both the Ways and Means Committee and Agriculture Committee, and did an outstanding job in helping us put this bill together.

Mr. Speaker, I am now pleased to yield 1 minute to one of our new outstanding freshmen on the Agriculture Committee, the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Mahoney) who represents a very big agriculture district and has done outstanding work for us.

Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to yield 1 minute to a good friend of the Agricultual Committee, Ms. Jackson-Lee of Texas.

Mr. Speaker, I would yield the gentlewoman 1 additional minute.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time.

Mr. Speaker, a lot of people make a lot of claims about this bill. Editorial writers, most of them get the information wrong. But as has been mentioned here before, 15 percent of the bill goes to farmers; 9 percent of that goes to traditional commodity type programs; the balance of it to crop insurance and the new disaster program; 73\1/2\ percent of this bill goes to nutrition programs, while 7 percent goes to conservation.

So you can talk all you want about the bull's-eye on the back of the farmers, but people need to understand that the European Union now is having discussion to get rid of their direct payments and increase their commodity price supports similar to what we have here in the United States. And there are people in this country that would like to do this as well. This ideology that's been pushed by the World Bank, the IMF, all of these other world organizations, is part of the reason we're in trouble in this country and in the world.

We have, not just us but countries all over the world, have sold food below the cost of our production. Some of our opponents want us to keep doing this. I understand if you're a livestock farmer you want to keep buying cheap corn. But we've addicted these folks in these developing countries to cheap food prices. Now that we're getting prices that are more realistic, all of a sudden it's a problem because they didn't develop their own agriculture. They got hooked on exports from the United States and from other countries.

What we're doing in this bill is recognizing all of the different aspects of this country, not just farm country, not just farmers, but people in the city, people in the suburbs, people that like to hunt and fish, people that are concerned about the environment, people that are concerned about getting nutritious food into our schools and having more fresh fruit and vegetables available for people around the country, and people that want to get independent from foreign oil. All of these things are covered in this bill.

Are they done to the magnitude that I would like in some areas? No. I would say everybody here would probably agree that they would like to have something a little bit stronger in one area or the other or maybe a little weaker in one area or the other.

But this is a compromise, a bipartisan compromise that I am proud of the way that we've been able to put together. Mr. Goodlatte and I sat in that room for many days with our colleagues on the other side of the aisle. We operated on an equal basis, as Mr. Goodlatte pointed out. There was give and take. This was a true bipartisan effort. We came up with a true bipartisan bill that we should be proud of that is good for America, that spends less than the last farm bill, that, as Mr. Goodlatte says, spends less than both bills that passed the House and the Senate. I can't remember a time around here when we've done something like that.

So I encourage my colleagues to take a good look at this bill to understand that this is something that's good for the country. I urge my colleagues to override the veto of the President.

I thank the gentleman.

As I understand it, it was just a glitch in the printing of the document that went to the White House. They vetoed the bill missing title III and didn't recognize it.

As I understand, the Constitution says that when we have a veto, we are bound to deal with it. So we don't see any other way to deal with this thing at this point other than to deal with the President's veto, have the override and then deal with title III later.

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of S. 2162, the Veterans' Mental Health and Other Care Improvements Act of 2008, as amended. I would like to say up front how very pleased I am with the overall bill, as well as S. 3023, as amended, the Veterans' Benefits Improvement Act, which will follow this bill.

Before us, this bill incorporates almost 50 veterans' health care provisions that have passed either the House or the Senate this Congress in 15 bills listed in the joint explanatory statement accompanying this legislation.

I would like to thank Chairman Filner and our esteemed colleagues in the Senate, Chairman Akaka and Ranking Member Richard Burr, for their bipartisan efforts to bring the compromise to the floor here tonight.

I would also like to commend Health Subcommittee Chairman Mike Michaud and Ranking Member Jeff Miller for their leadership and spirit of cooperation that enabled us to reach this compromise agreement with the Senate.

This comprehensive bill includes an array of substantive initiatives, and I would like to highlight just a few of them.

The chairman just mentioned the construction bill. And in particular, I'm very pleased that we have the $66 million to fund for the fifth polytrauma center. And at these polytrauma centers, very dedicated individuals do amazing work to help save America's most precious assets. And so funding for the fifth polytrauma center is extremely important.

I am also pleased that we have not only the facilities in Palo Alto, but also in Puerto Rico with regard to seismic corrections. We have increases in previous authorizations, not only in New Orleans, but also in Denver. And I'm most hopeful that the initiatives in Denver can be worked out satisfactorily that also please the Secretary of the VA. We also have increases with Orlando. So these three ongoing projects, New Orleans, Denver and Orlando, are extremely important to me.

I also recognize and I want to thank the chairman. At the last moment--out-of-scope revisions are always difficult for us, and the VA brought us one of the out-of-scope provisions that dealt with the outpatient clinic in Peoria. And I want to thank the chairman for taking this up, and I also want to thank the Senate for accepting this, because that facility in Peoria, there were some miscalculations. And had we not acted, the VA could have proceeded, but in the end it would have cost us more money.

Acting and taking care of this outpatient clinic in Peoria was the right thing to do. I want to thank the chairman for taking up this out- of-scope provision and also for the leadership of Ray LaHood of Illinois.

I also want to comment on the VA substance-use disorder and mental health programs. A full continuum of care for substance-use disorder will go a long way I believe to help at-risk veterans obtain care and overcome the stigma that may prevent them from seeking the services that they in fact need.

In order to ensure that VA implements a patient-centered pain care strategy that is effective and consistent system-wide, the bill will require the VA to develop and implement

a comprehensive pain management policy.

The bill will also establish a pilot program to allow veterans in certain highly rural areas to obtain care from their local community providers. This provision originated from legislation introduced by my good friend and long-time member of the VA Committee, Jerry Moran of Kansas. Jerry Moran is a real champion of rural veterans, and I applaud him for his hard work and dedication to this cause. This is a cause that has lasted now for several Congresses.

I am pleased that this bill also includes a measure I introduced, H.R. 6366, to help the VA secure collections from third-party insurance companies. This is an issue that I have been working on now for the last four sessions of Congress. Specifically, it would require the VA to establish seven Consolidated Patient Accounting Centers, or CPACs, modeled after the successful Mid-Atlantic CPAC over the next 5 years. I would like to thank Chairman Filner for working with me in a bipartisan fashion to make sure that this was included in the bill, and I also want to applaud the leadership of Mike Michaud and Mr. Miller.

This measure comes from a bill I introduced to help the VA better manage third-party collections and provide additional fiscal responsibility for the department. The Consolidated Patient Accounting Center was established as a demonstration project back in 2005. It proved to be very successful in enhancing revenue by more than $12.5 million in fiscal year 2007 in the demonstration project alone and more than $22 million over and above the goal as of August for fiscal year 2008.

Building on this success would enable the VA to secure hundreds of millions of dollars that currently go uncollected. What we did is we did a pilot. We found how successful that pilot project was over and above the projected revenue that we would get. And so we looked at this and said, well, this is something that needs to be rolled out across the country, and when we do this, we in fact are going to be receiving hundreds of millions of dollars. Those dollars then can be poured back in to further improve veterans' health care.

I want to thank subcommittee Chairman Mike Michaud and Ranking Member Jeff Miller for having joined me as cosponsors on this initiative along with the leadership of Chairman Filner.

Also, Mr. Speaker, there are a number of other important provisions in this bill that are omitted from my remarks simply because of the result of the constraints on time. But I would like to conclude by mentioning a notable provision that would designate the spinal cord injury center at the VA Medical Center in Tampa, Florida, as the Michael Bilirakis Department of Veterans Affairs Spinal Cord Injury Center that the chairman spoke of. All of us have a great deal of respect for Michael Bilirakis, and I am very, very pleased that my good friend and this great public servant is going to be recognized.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to acknowledge at this time the hard work of the staff of both sides of the aisle here in the House Committee on Veterans' Affairs for their work on this legislation, in particular not only the individuals of the House majority health subcommittee but also that in the House and the Senate.

With that, I want to reserve my time.

Mr. Speaker, I would like to yield to the gentleman from Kansas who actually represents 69 counties in the State of Kansas, which is about the size of the State of Indiana. But before he gets too excited, you could probably take five Kansases and put it in the State of Alaska. I bring that to your attention, Mr. Speaker, because this gentleman is a champion of rural America.

With that, I yield as much time as the gentleman from Kansas (Mr. Moran) may consume.

Reclaiming my time, I want to thank the gentleman for his leadership. He went through several Congresses with this. This is a testimonial really to your persistence and your dedication to the issue. I want to thank you. You never gave up on it. I want to thank you for your leadership.

With that, I reserve my time.

The first thing I would like to do, Mr. Speaker, is I want to thank Mr. Hare for his leadership in mental health. You're a great addition to the committee, and I want to thank the gentleman.

With that I reserve my time.

Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.

I would like to comment on a provision from the ranking member in the Senate, Richard Burr, the provision to require the VA to provide financial assistance grants to very low income veterans families residing in permanent housing for supportive services, including outreach, case management, assistance in obtaining VA benefits and assistance in obtaining other forms of public benefits.

As we transition veterans from homelessness into permanent housing, these are provisions that in the last Congress Senator Burr was working very hard on, but did not come out as a result of the conference. He hung in there and we were able to get this done, and I want to thank Chairman Filner, who also accepted these provisions, and I want to extend my appreciation.

I also want to extend appreciation to the leadership and to some Members who worked very hard on Orlando in making sure that that becomes a reality. These are Members that seem to never leave me alone. In particular, Tom Feeney, Cliff Stearns, Corrine Brown, Ginny Brown- Waite and Ric Keller, working very hard to make sure that Orlando becomes a reality.

The last thing I would like to thank Chairman Filner for was accepting the provisions along with Chairman Michaud, and that was Ranking Member Jeff Miller of the Health Subcommittee sought to eliminate all copayments for hospice care. Those of us that have had to deal with a loved one that goes through hospice care understand how difficult and challenging that moment is in all of our lives. So for us to waive those copayments during that time period I think was the right thing to do, and I want to thank the gentleman for his leadership on that.

With that, I encourage all Members to support this legislation.

Madam Speaker, I yield back my time.

General Leave