Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 3890) to amend the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003 to waive the requirement for annual renewal resolutions relating to…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 3890) to amend the Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act of 2003 to waive the requirement for annual renewal resolutions relating to import sanctions, impose import sanctions on Burmese gemstones, expand the number of individuals against whom the visa ban is applicable, expand the blocking of assets and other prohibited activities, and for other purposes, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on the bill under consideration.
Mr. Speaker, I rise in strong support of this resolution, and I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, just a few short months ago, Burma's Saffron Revolution unfolded before the eyes of the world. Buddhist monks draped in crimson robes peacefully marching through the streets of Rangoon. Tens of thousands of Burmese citizens joining the monks, echoing their calls for change. A chorus of world voices asking the Burma's ruling junta to respond peacefully and responsibly to cries for freedom and democracy.
The reaction of the ruling regime to these peaceful demonstrations was equally as unforgettable. Unarmed monks shot in the streets, in full view of the international community. Thousands of peaceful monks hauled off to detention centers to be tortured. Political dissidents tossed in jail, facing years behind bars simply for criticizing the government.
In recent days, loudspeakers across the country warn: ``We have video. We will find you,'' all in an Orwellian effort to intimidate Burma's people and deter them from their aspirations for democracy and a better life.
This crackdown on nonviolent protesters and Buddhist monks by Burma's military thugs sets a new low of brutality even for this regime of military dictators.
These brutal actions demonstrate the moral bankruptcy of the regime. Unfortunately, the regime is not economically bankrupt. It continues to take Burma's vast resources as its own while the vast majority of Burma's people suffer in dire poverty.
The legislation before the House today hits the regime where it hurts, in the wallet. By blocking the import of Burmese gems into the United States and expanding financial sanctions, the legislation will take hundreds of millions out of the pockets of the regime each year.
This legislation is supported by United States industry. The 11,000- store Jewelers of America supports a ban of Burmese gem imports to the United States. Major retailers like Tiffany's and Bulgari have also voluntarily implemented such a ban.
The bill before the House also cuts off tax deductions for Chevron's major gas investment in Burma. By closing this loophole, we can dramatically increase pressure on other civilized nations to similarly demand that their firms divest themselves of Burma holdings.
This bipartisan bill strengthens our goal of a coordinated, multilateral approach to sanctions against Burma. The European Union recently announced a similar ban on the import of Burmese gems, as have the Canadians. I hope our legislation will push other countries to reexamine their financial dealings with the regime and the investment their oil companies make in Burma.
Mr. Speaker, I am pleased to offer this legislation to strengthen the sanctions imposed by the 2003 Burmese Freedom and Democracy Act. In doing so, I am again joined by the ranking Republican member of the Foreign Affairs Committee, Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, and Mr. Peter King of the Homeland Security Committee, both of whom have been strong voices for freedom in Burma.
Let me also express my appreciation to the chairman of the Ways and Means Committee, Mr. Rangel, and the chairman of the Trade Subcommittee, Mr. Levin, as well as their Republican counterparts, Mr. McCrery and Mr. Herger, for their enormous help in moving this bill forward.
Finally, I would like to highlight the indispensable leadership of Speaker Nancy Pelosi on this legislation. Since the first shots were fired in Rangoon, the Speaker has firmly indicated the intention of House Democrats to significantly tighten sanctions on the ruling Burmese regime. And today, we fulfill that promise.
Mr. Speaker, Burmese freedom fighter and Nobel Laureate Aung San Suu Kyi memorably asked the world community, ``Use your liberty to promote ours.'' So today, we use our liberty in the United States Congress to dramatically increase the economic pressure on the Burmese regime to move towards freedom, democracy and respect for human rights.
We use our liberty to stop the flow of blood red rubies from Burma into American jewelry stores. The Burmese regime might have washed the blood from the streets of Rangoon, but they have not erased the images of peaceful protesters being shot down from our minds. Today, we act, and we act decisively.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I include for the Record an exchange of letters between Chairman Rangel and Chairman Lantos on H.R. 3890.
House of Representatives,
Committee on Ways and Means,
Washington, DC, December 10, 2007.
Hon. Tom Lantos,
Chairman, Committee on Foreign Affairs,
Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Chairman: I am writing regarding H.R. 3890, the
Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic Efforts) Act of
2007, which was reported by the House Foreign Affairs
Committee on October 31, 2007.
As you know, the Committee on Ways & Means has jurisdiction
over import matters, such as the import ban and restrictions
on
imports imposed by the Block Burmese JADE Act of 2007.
Accordingly, certain provisions of H.R. 3890 fall under the
Committee's jurisdiction.
There have been some productive conversations between the
staffs of our committees, during which we have proposed some
changes to H.R. 3890 that I believe help clarify the intent
and scope of the measure. My understanding is that there is
an agreement with regard to these changes.
The following provisions of H.R. 3890 were among those
changed, added, or removed because they fell within the
Committee's jurisdiction:
Section 3(a) (``Annual Renewal of Resolutions No Longer
Required''): This subsection was removed;
Section 3(b) (Import Restrictions on Gemstones): This
subsection was removed and a new Section 3A (``Prohibition on
Importation of Certain Jadeite and Rubies and Articles of
Jewelry Containing Jadeite or Rubies'') was added;
New Section 3A(a) (``Definitions'') contains definitions
for the terms ``Appropriate Congressional Committees,''
``Burmese Covered Article,'' ``Non-Burmese Covered Article,''
``Jadeite; Rubies; Articles of Jewelry Containing Jadeite or
Rubies,'' and ``United States'';
New Section 3A(b) (``Prohibitions on Importation of Burmese
Covered Articles''): Provides that the President shall
prohibit the importation into the United States of any
Burmese covered article and use provided regulatory authority
as necessary; and the President shall take actions to seek a
draft waiver decision by the Council on Trade in Goods of the
World Trade Organization and adoption of a United Nations
General Assembly resolution;
New Section 3A(c) (``Requirements for Importation of Non-
Burmese Covered Articles''): Provides that the President,
beginning 60 days after the date of enactment, shall require
certain actions by the exporting country, exporter and
importer as a condition of importing non-Burmese covered
articles into the United States to ensure that the imported
articles do not contain Burmese jadeite or rubies;
New Section 3A(d) (``Inapplicability''): Exempts certain
imports from the requirements of the Act;
New Section 3A(e) (``Enforcement''): Provides that Burmese
covered articles and non-Burmese covered articles imported
into the United States in violation of the Act are subject to
all applicable laws of the United States;
New Section 3A(f) (``Sense of Congress''): Provides that
the President should take the necessary steps to negotiate an
international agreement similar to the Kimberley Process
Certification Scheme for conflict diamonds; and
New Section 7 (``Waiver of Competitive Need Limitation
Under Generalized System of Preferences For Certain Articles
of India and Thailand''): Provides for the reinstatement of
Generalized System of Preferences (duty-free treatment) for
specified Thai and Indian jewelry.
To expedite this legislation for floor consideration, the
Committee will forgo action on this bill and will not oppose
its consideration on the suspension calendar. This is done
with the understanding that it does not in any way prejudice
the Committee or its jurisdictional prerogatives on this, or
similar legislation, in the future.
I would appreciate your response to this letter, confirming
our understanding with respect to H.R. 3890, and would ask
that a copy of our exchange of letters on this matter be
included in the record.
Sincerely,
Charles B. Rangel,
Chairman.
House of Representatives,
Committee on Foreign Affairs,
Washington, DC, December 10, 2007.
Hon. Charles B. Rangel,
Chairman, Committee on Ways and Means, Washington, DC.
Dear Mr. Chairman: Thank you for your letter regarding H.R.
3890, the Block Burmese JADE (Junta's Anti-Democratic
Efforts) Act of 2007.
I appreciate your willingness to work cooperatively on this
legislation and the mutually agreed upon text that is being
presented to the House, including the amendments to H.R. 3890
reported by the Committee on Foreign Affairs, as described in
your letter. I recognize that the bill contains provisions
that fall within the jurisdiction of the Committee on Ways
and Means. I agree that the inaction of your Committee with
respect to the bill does not in any way prejudice the
Committee on Ways and Means or its jurisdictional
prerogatives on this or similar legislation in the future.
I will ensure that our exchange of letters be included in
the Congressional Record.
Cordially,
Tom Lantos,
Chairman.
Mr. Speaker, I have no further requests for time, and I yield back the balance of my time.