H.Res. 93House110th Congress (2007-2009)Introduced

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Introduced January 24, 2007

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

3 earlier actions
HouseFloor Latest Action

On motion to table the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 223 - 189 (Roll No. 54).

January 24, 2007 • 12:46 PM

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

January 24, 2007

HouseFloor

Considered as privileged matter. (consideration: CR H902-903)

January 24, 2007 • 12:27 PM

HouseFloor

Mr. Hastings (FL) moved to table the resolution.

January 24, 2007 • 12:30 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to table the resolution Agreed to by recorded vote: 223 - 189 (Roll No. 54).

January 24, 2007 • 12:46 PM

Floor Debate

2 members

What members said about H.Res. 93 on the floor

1 Republican1 Democrat
John A. Boehner
Rep. John A. BoehnerR-OH-8 · Jan 24, 2007

Mr. Speaker, I rise to a question of the privileges of the House, and I send to the desk a resolution. Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.

Alcee L. Hastings
Rep. Alcee L. HastingsD-FL-23 · Jan 24, 2007

Mr. Speaker, I move to lay on the table the resolution of the distinguished gentleman.

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued January 24, 2007

IV

110th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. RES. 93

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 24, 2007

Mr. Boehner submitted the following resolution; which was laid on the table

RESOLUTION

Raising a question of the privileges of the House.

Whereas at approximately 11:30 a.m. on the 23rd of January, 2007, the Committee on Rules began consideration of a special order of business providing for consideration of H. Res. 78;

Whereas the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Kirk) submitted an amendment to the Committee for its consideration;

Whereas during a recess of the Committee, the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Kirk) submitted a letter to the Chairwoman of the Committee on Rules requesting that his amendment be withdrawn from further consideration;

Whereas that letter was date stamped in the customary practice of the Committee;

Whereas it has been the long standing practice of the Committee to not further consider amendments that have been so withdrawn;

Whereas the gentleman from Massachusetts (Mr. McGovern) made a motion to report a special order of business providing for consideration of the amendment by Mr. Kirk despite its withdrawal;

Whereas when the issue of the withdrawal of the amendment was being debated by the Committee, the Ranking Republican Member attempted to obtain a copy of the letter from the Majority and the Majority willfully refused to produce a copy of the letter after repeated requests; and

Whereas the wrongful refusal of the Majority to produce a copy of the letter under debate constituted a breach of the dignity and integrity of the Committee’s proceedings: Now, therefore, be it

That the House of Representatives disapproves of the actions taken by the Committee’s Majority and directs the Chairwoman of the Committee to undertake practices to prevent future occurrences.