Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution (H. Res. 945) raising awareness and promoting education on the criminal justice system by establishing March 2008 as ``National…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and agree to the resolution (H. Res. 945) raising awareness and promoting education on the criminal justice system by establishing March 2008 as ``National Criminal Justice Month''.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, Members of the House, the measure before us calls attention to a critically important issue, the state of our Nation's criminal justice system. We do this by designating March as National Criminal Justice Month, because it will serve to raise awareness of the causes and consequences of crime, as well as our crime prevention efforts. It is a subject and an area that, for too long, we have not paid close attention to, and it is our feeling that this designation will have a great impact upon our work.
Millions of Americans have been victimized by crimes, and many millions more pass through our criminal justice system. We have more than 2 million Americans behind bars, I am sad to say. This means that almost one out of every 100 Americans is incarcerated. Among African American men between the ages of 20 and 34, one in nine are behind bars. What a tragedy. What a waste of human life and potential.
The New York Times observed, ``We have become a prison nation.''
[From the New York Times, Mar. 10, 2008]
Prison Nation
After three decades of explosive growth, the nation's
prison population has reached some grim milestones: More than
1 in 100 American adults are behind bars. One in nine black
men, ages 20 to 34, are serving time, as are 1 in 36 adult
Hispanic men.
Nationwide, the prison population hovers at almost 1.6
million, which surpasses all other countries for which there
are reliable figures. The 50 states last year spent about $44
billion in tax dollars on corrections, up from nearly $11
billion in 1987. Vermont, Connecticut, Delaware, Michigan and
Oregon devote as much money or more to corrections as they do
to higher education.
These statistics, contained in a new report from the Pew
Center on the States, point to a terrible waste of money and
lives. They underscore the urgent challenge facing the
federal government and cash-strapped states to reduce their
overreliance on incarceration without sacrificing public
safety. The key, as some states are learning, is getting
smarter about distinguishing between violent criminals and
dangerous repeat offenders, who need a prison cell, and low-
risk offenders, who can be handled with effective community
supervision, electronic monitoring and mandatory drug
treatment programs, combined in some cases with shorter
sentences.
Persuading public officials to adopt a more rational, cost-
effective approach to prison policy is a daunting prospect,
however, not least because building and running jailhouses
has become a major industry.
Criminal behavior partly explains the size of the prison
population, but incarceration rates have continued to rise
while crime rates have fallen. Any effort to reduce the
prison population must consider the blunderbuss impact of
get-tough sentencing laws adopted across the United States
beginning in the 1970's. Many Americans have come to believe,
wrongly, that keeping an outsized chunk of the population
locked up is essential for sustaining a historic crime drop
since the 1990's.
In fact, the relationship between imprisonment and crime
control is murky. Some portion of the decline is attributable
to tough sentencing and release policies. But crime is also
affected by things like economic trends and employment and
drug-abuse rates. States that lagged behind the national
average in rising incarceration rates during the 1990's
actually experienced a steeper decline in crime rates than
states above the national average, according to the
Sentencing Project, a nonprofit group.
A rising number of states are broadening their criminal
sanctions with new options for low-risk offenders that are a
lot cheaper than incarceration but still protect the public
and hold offenders accountable. In New York, the crime rate
has continued to drop despite efforts to reduce the number of
nonviolent drug offenders in prison.
The Pew report spotlights policy changes in Texas and
Kansas that have started to reduce their outsized prison
populations and address recidivism by investing in ways to
improve the success rates for community supervision,
expanding treatment and diversion programs, and increasing
use of sanctions other than prison for minor parole and
probation violations. Recently, the Supreme Court and the
United States Sentencing Commission announced sensible
changes in the application of harsh mandatory minimum drug
sentences.
These are signs that the country may finally be waking up
to the fiscal and moral costs of bulging prisons.
Each year, we on all of our criminal justice systems spend more than $200 billion. The Pew Center Report states that Connecticut, Delaware, my own State of Michigan, Oregon, and Vermont spend as much or more money on corrections as they do on higher education. I think this is a disgraceful circumstance, and the policies of simply incarcerating increasing numbers of Americans without real opportunities for rehabilitation fail those who go through the criminal justice system, but, more than that, it hurts and diminishes every American.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I only have a little bit more to add, and so I yield myself a little more time.
This measure is a good one even though it comes a little late. Some may have noticed that this is for a celebration in March, and this is April. The reason is that we couldn't get it on the schedule before now, but there were many celebrations in connection with this matter that occurred.
I want to commend the judge and distinguished member of the Judiciary Committee from Texas who is managing the bill for his personal comments that he has brought to this matter today. I can imagine the kinds of things that not only him but members of the judiciary across this country are seeing, heartbreaking incidents, circumstances and experiences.
There are so many people that are incarcerated, they are in prison because of nonviolent offenses, of sentencing procedures that are really out of the hands of the court. People think of the unlimited powers of the judiciary. Many times they are restricted in terms of what it is they can do and how they can handle the matters that come before their courts.
I am impressed that our colleague would tell us of some of the things that move him in his experience in the judiciary. Now I don't want to think that he was driven from the judiciary to the Congress because that is like jumping out of the frying pan into the fire; but I am happy that he serves on the committee with great distinction, and we always are pleased to be able to work together on these kinds of matters.
In that spirit, I urge the support of H. Res. 945.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.