H.Res. 1101House111th Congress (2009-2011)In Committee

Establishing an earmark moratorium for fiscal year 2011.

Sponsored by Jeff FlakeRep. Jeff Flake (R-AZ)
Introduced February 23, 2010

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

February 23, 2010

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

February 23, 2010

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Rules.

February 23, 2010

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued February 23, 2010

IV

111th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. RES. 1101

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 23, 2010

Mr. Flake submitted the following resolution; which was referred to the Committee on Rules

RESOLUTION

Establishing an earmark moratorium for fiscal year 2011.

That

(a)

it shall not be in order to consider—

(1)

a bill or joint resolution reported by any committee, or any amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that includes a congressional earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit; or

(2)

a bill or joint resolution not reported by any committee, or any amendment thereto or conference report thereon, that includes a congressional earmark, limited tax benefit, or limited tariff benefit.

(b)

For the purposes of this resolution, the terms congressional earmark, limited tax benefit, and limited tariff benefit have the meaning given those terms in clause 9 of rule XXI of the Rules of the House of Representatives.

(c)

The point of order under subsection (a) shall only apply to legislation providing or authorizing discretionary budget authority, credit authority, or other spending authority, providing a Federal tax deduction, credit, or exclusion, or modifying the Harmonized Tariff Schedule in fiscal year 2011.

(d)

This resolution shall not apply to any authorization of appropriations to a Federal entity if such authorization is not specifically targeted to a State, locality, or congressional district.

2.

The Committee on Rules may not report a rule or order that would waive the point of order set forth in the first section of this resolution.