H.R. 3842House112th Congress (2011-2013)In Committee

To prohibit Federal funding for lawsuits seeking to invalidate specified State laws that support the enforcement of Federal immigration laws.

Introduced January 31, 2012

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

3 earlier actions
HouseCommittee Latest Action

Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement.

February 16, 2012

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

January 31, 2012

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

January 31, 2012

HouseIntro Referral

Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H521)

February 7, 2012

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Immigration Policy and Enforcement.

February 16, 2012

Floor Debate

1 member

What members said about H.R. 3842 on the floor

1 Republican
Diane Black
Rep. Diane BlackR-TN-6 · Feb 7, 2012

Mr. Speaker, I am here today to talk about my bill, H.R. 3842, a bill that would prohibit the Obama administration from filing lawsuits against Arizona, South Carolina, Alabama, and other States over…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued January 31, 2012

I

112th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 3842

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

January 31, 2012

Mrs. Black (for herself, Mr. Bachus, Mrs. Blackburn, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Carter, Mr. Duncan of Tennessee, Mrs. Ellmers, Mr. Franks of Arizona, Mr. Gosar, Mr. Graves of Georgia, Mr. Hall, Mr. Herger, Mr. Huelskamp, Ms. Jenkins, Mr. Jones, Mr. Kinzinger of Illinois, Mr. Landry, Mr. Lankford, Mr. Long, Mr. Manzullo, Mr. Marchant, Mr. Pompeo, Mr. Quayle, Mr. Ross of Florida, Mr. Scott of South Carolina, Mr. Westmoreland, and Mr. Wilson of South Carolina) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

A BILL

To prohibit Federal funding for lawsuits seeking to invalidate specified State laws that support the enforcement of Federal immigration laws.

1.

Federal funding for lawsuits seeking to invalidate State immigration laws

Federal funds may not be used by any agency or instrumentality of the Federal Government to participate in any lawsuit that seeks to overturn, enjoin, or in any other way invalidate—

(1)

Oklahoma Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act of 2007 (HB 1804), which became effective on November 1, 2007;

(2)

Missouri House Bill 390, First Regular Session 2009, 9th General Assembly, which became effective on August 28, 2009;

(3)

the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (SB 1070), which was signed into law in Arizona on April 23, 2010;

(4)

The Illegal Immigration Enforcement Act (HB 497), which was signed into law in Utah on March 15, 2011;

(5)

Indiana Senate Enrolled Act No. 590, First Regular Session, 117th General Assembly (2011), which was signed into law on May 10, 2011;

(6)

the Beason-Hammon Alabama Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act (HB 56), which was passed by the Alabama State legislature on June 9, 2011;

(7)

South Carolina Act No. 69 (SB 20), which was signed into law on June 27, 2011;

(8)

the Illegal Immigration Reform and Enforcement Act of 2011 (HB 87), which became effective in the State of Georgia on July 1, 2011; or

(9)

an Act to amend the Indiana Code concerning education (HB 1402), which became effective in the State of Indiana on July 1, 2011.