H.R. 489House113th Congress (2013-2015)In Committee

HUBZone Expansion Act of 2013

Introduced February 4, 2013

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

February 4, 2013

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

February 4, 2013

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Small Business.

February 4, 2013

Floor Debate

3 members

What members said about H.R. 489 on the floor

1 Republican2 Democrats
John Garamendi
Rep. John GaramendiD-CA-3 · May 20, 2014

Mr. Speaker, recently, The Sacramento Bee wrote a three-page article on Alzheimer's and the effect that it has. I would like to quote from that newspaper: Gasps were audible as the images flashed…

Brett Guthrie
Rep. Brett GuthrieR-KY-2 · May 20, 2014

I want to thank my friend from California for yielding. I rise today, Mr. Speaker, to talk about this devastating disease that impacts nearly every family in America: Alzheimer's disease. According…

Paul Tonko
Rep. Paul TonkoD-NY-20 · May 20, 2014

Well, we all love Louise Slaughter. We extend our condolences for the loss of her beloved Bob, who was part of this institution. He was here so much and intellectually invested himself in the…

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued February 4, 2013

I

113th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 489

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

February 4, 2013

Ms. Pingree of Maine (for herself and Mr. Michaud) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Small Business

A BILL

To expand the HUBZone program for communities affected by base realignment and closure, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the HUBZone Expansion Act of 2013.

2.

Expanding HUBZone program for communities affected by base realignment and closure

Section 3(p)(4)(D) of the Small Business Act (15 U.S.C. 632(p)(4)(D)) is amended—

(1)

in clause (iv), by striking the period at the end and inserting ; and;

(2)

by redesignating clauses (i), (ii), (iii), and (iv) as subclauses (I), (II), (III), and (IV), respectively, and moving the margins 2 ems to the right;

(3)

in the matter preceding subclause (I), as so redesignated, by striking means lands within and inserting the following: “means—

(i)

lands within

; and

(4)

by adding at the end the following:

(ii)

a geographic area that—

(I)

is—

(aa)

the municipality in which the military installation is located;

(bb)

the county in which the military installation is located; or

(cc)
(AA)

the census tract in which the military installation is located; or

(BB)

the census tract in which the military installation is located and a census tract contiguous to that census tract; and

(II)

has a total population of not more than 50,000, as determined with reference to the most recent decennial census.

.