H.R. 2376House116th Congress (2019-2021)In Committee

Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2019

Introduced April 29, 2019

AI-Generated Summary

Updated April 14, 2026 at 4:24 AM UTC

The Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2019 directs the FTC to investigate the role of pharmacy benefit managers and other middlemen in the drug supply chain. It requires an interim update after 180 days and a full report within a year, focusing on pricing practices, competition, and any legal obstacles. The goal is to provide Congress with recommendations to make drug pricing more transparent and competitive, ultimately helping consumers and payers.

Key Provisions

  • The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) must study how intermediaries—such as pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) and pharmacy services administrative organizations—affect drug pricing and competition.
  • Within 180 days of the bill becoming law, the FTC must give Congress an interim report on its progress and any early findings.
  • Within one year, the FTC must deliver a final report that: (a) examines whether PBMs charge payers more than they reimburse pharmacies, steer patients to pharmacies they own, misuse data to limit competition, or use formularies to favor higher‑cost drugs; (b) identifies legal or regulatory barriers that prevent a transparent, competitive market; (c) evaluates how payers and companies assess the costs and risks of working with these intermediaries; and (d) offers policy or legislative recommendations to improve transparency, curb anticompetitive behavior, and ensure consumers benefit from any cost savings.
  • The reports are to be sent to the Senate and House Judiciary Committees.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

6 earlier actions
HouseCommittee Latest Action

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

May 21, 2019

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

April 29, 2019

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

April 29, 2019

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Health.

April 30, 2019

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

April 30, 2019

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported by Voice Vote.

April 30, 2019

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Consumer Protection and Commerce.

April 30, 2019

HouseCommittee

Subcommittee Hearings Held.

May 21, 2019

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Introduced in HouseIssued April 29, 2019

I

116th CONGRESS

1st Session

H. R. 2376

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

April 29, 2019

Mr. Collins of Georgia (for himself and Mr. Nadler) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned

A BILL

To require the Federal Trade Commission to study the role of intermediaries in the pharmaceutical supply chain and provide Congress with appropriate policy recommendations, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Prescription Pricing for the People Act of 2019.

2.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Appropriate committees of congress

The term appropriate committees of Congress means—

(A)

the Committee on the Judiciary of the Senate; and

(B)

the Committee on the Judiciary of the House of Representatives.

(2)

Commission

The term Commission means the Federal Trade Commission.

3.

Study of pharmaceutical supply chain intermediaries and merger activity

(a)

Initial report

Not later than 1 year after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report that—

(1)

addresses at minimum—

(A)

whether pharmacy benefit managers—

(i)

charge payers a higher price than the reimbursement rate at which the pharmacy benefit managers reimburse competing pharmacies;

(ii)

steer patients for anticompetitive purposes to any pharmacies, including retail, mail-order, or any other type of pharmacy, in which the PBM has an ownership interest;

(iii)

audit or review proprietary data, including acquisition costs, patient information, or dispensing information, of competing pharmacies that can be used for anticompetitive purposes; or

(iv)

use formulary designs to increase the market share of higher cost prescription drugs and depress the market share of lower cost prescription drugs (each net of rebates and discounts);

(B)

whether there are any specific legal or regulatory obstacles the Commission currently faces in ensuring a competitive and transparent marketplace in the pharmaceutical supply chain, including the pharmacy benefit manager marketplace and pharmacy services administrative organizations;

(C)

how companies and payers assess the benefits, costs, and risks of contracting with intermediaries, including pharmacy services administrative organizations, and whether more information about the roles of intermediaries should be available to consumers and payers; and

(D)

whether there are any specific legal or regulatory obstacles the Commission currently faces in ensuring a competitive and transparent marketplace in the pharmaceutical supply chain, including the pharmacy benefit manager marketplace and pharmacy services administrative organizations; and

(2)

provides—

(A)

observations or conclusions drawn from the November 2017 roundtable entitled Understanding Competition in Prescription Drug Markets: Entry and Supply Chain Dynamics, and any similar efforts;

(B)

specific actions the Commission intends to take as a result of the November 2017 roundtable, and any similar efforts, including a detailed description of relevant forthcoming actions, additional research or roundtable discussions, consumer education efforts, or enforcement actions; and

(C)

policy or legislative recommendations to—

(i)

improve transparency and competition in the pharmaceutical supply chain;

(ii)

prevent and deter anticompetitive behavior in the pharmaceutical supply chain; and

(iii)

best ensure that consumers benefit from any cost savings or efficiencies that may result from mergers and consolidations.

(b)

Interim report

Not later than 180 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Commission shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress an interim report on the progress of the report required by subsection (a), along with preliminary findings and conclusions based on information collected to that date.