H.R. 5546House116th Congress (2019-2021)Passed House

Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act

Introduced January 7, 2020

AI-Generated Summary

Updated April 14, 2026 at 10:20 AM UTC

The Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act requires the Attorney General to set up a system for electronic communications in federal prisons that keeps privileged messages between inmates and their lawyers from being monitored. It also sets rules for how the Bureau of Prisons can retain those messages and who may access them, aiming to protect attorney‑client privilege while still allowing limited law‑enforcement access under strict safeguards.

Key Provisions

  • Within 180 days, the Attorney General must create or modify a communications system so that any privileged electronic communication between an incarcerated person and their attorney (or the attorney’s staff) is excluded from monitoring.
  • The Bureau of Prisons may retain the contents of all electronic communications, including privileged ones, until the inmate is released, but access to retained privileged content is tightly limited.
  • The Attorney General may view retained content only to maintain the system and may not review the messages themselves.
  • Law‑enforcement officers may access retained content only with a court‑issued warrant approved by a U.S. Attorney or Assistant Attorney General, and a U.S. Attorney must screen the content to ensure privileged messages are not disclosed.
  • Any U.S. Attorney who reviews retained content is barred from participating in any criminal case involving the inmate whose messages were accessed, and from sharing the content with attorneys in that case.
  • If privileged content is accessed improperly, a court may suppress the evidence upon the defendant’s motion.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

14 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

September 22, 2020

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

January 7, 2020

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

January 7, 2020

HouseCommittee

Referred to the Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security.

January 28, 2020

HouseCommittee

Subcommittee on Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security Discharged.

February 11, 2020

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held.

February 12, 2020

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported.

February 12, 2020

HouseCommittee

Reported by the Committee on Judiciary. H. Rept. 116-507.

September 16, 2020

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 407.

September 16, 2020

HouseFloor

Ms. Scanlon moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill.

September 21, 2020 • 2:04 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4576-4579)

September 21, 2020 • 2:04 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 5546.

September 21, 2020 • 2:04 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote.

September 21, 2020 • 2:19 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4577)

September 21, 2020 • 2:19 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

September 21, 2020 • 2:19 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

September 22, 2020

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued September 22, 2020

IIB

116th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 5546

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

September 22, 2020

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary

AN ACT

To regulate monitoring of electronic communications between an incarcerated person in a Bureau of Prisons facility and that person’s attorney or other legal representative, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Effective Assistance of Counsel in the Digital Era Act.

2.

Electronic communications between an incarcerated person and the person’s attorney

(a)

Prohibition on monitoring

Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Attorney General shall create a program or system, or modify any program or system that exists on the date of enactment of this Act, through which an incarcerated person sends or receives an electronic communication, to exclude from monitoring the contents of any privileged electronic communication. In the case that the Attorney General creates a program or system in accordance with this subsection, the Attorney General shall, upon implementing such system, discontinue using any program or system that exists on the date of enactment of this Act through which an incarcerated person sends or receives a privileged electronic communication, except that any program or system that exists on such date may continue to be used for any other electronic communication.

(b)

Retention of contents

A program or system or a modification to a program or system under subsection (a) may allow for retention by the Bureau of Prisons of, and access by an incarcerated person to, the contents of electronic communications, including the contents of privileged electronic communications, of the person until the date on which the person is released from prison.

(c)

Attorney-Client privilege

Attorney-client privilege, and the protections and limitations associated with such privilege (including the crime fraud exception), applies to electronic communications sent or received through the program or system established or modified under subsection (a).

(d)

Accessing retained contents

Contents retained under subsection (b) may only be accessed by a person other than the incarcerated person for whom such contents are retained under the following circumstances:

(1)

Attorney General

The Attorney General may only access retained contents if necessary for the purpose of creating and maintaining the program or system, or any modification to the program or system, through which an incarcerated person sends or receives electronic communications. The Attorney General may not review retained contents that are accessed pursuant to this paragraph.

(2)

Investigative and law enforcement officers

(A)

Warrant

(i)

In general

Retained contents may only be accessed by an investigative or law enforcement officer pursuant to a warrant issued by a court pursuant to the procedures described in the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure.

(ii)

Approval

No application for a warrant may be made to a court without the express approval of a United States Attorney or an Assistant Attorney General.

(B)

Privileged information

(i)

Review

Before retained contents may be accessed pursuant to a warrant obtained under subparagraph (A), such contents shall be reviewed by a United States Attorney to ensure that privileged electronic communications are not accessible.

(ii)

Barring participation

A United States Attorney who reviews retained contents pursuant to clause (i) shall be barred from—

(I)

participating in a legal proceeding in which an individual who sent or received an electronic communication from which such contents are retained under subsection (b) is a defendant; or

(II)

sharing the retained contents with an attorney who is participating in such a legal proceeding.

(3)

Motion to suppress

In a case in which retained contents have been accessed in violation of this subsection, a court may suppress evidence obtained or derived from access to such contents upon motion of the defendant.

(e)

Definitions

In this Act—

(1)

the term agent of an attorney or legal representative means any person employed by or contracting with an attorney or legal representative, including law clerks, interns, investigators, paraprofessionals, and administrative staff;

(2)

the term contents has the meaning given such term in 2510 of title 18, United States Code;

(3)

the term electronic communication has the meaning given such term in section 2510 of title 18, United States Code, and includes the Trust Fund Limited Inmate Computer System;

(4)

the term monitoring means accessing the contents of an electronic communication at any time after such communication is sent;

(5)

the term incarcerated person means any individual in the custody of the Bureau of Prisons or the United States Marshals Service who has been charged with or convicted of an offense against the United States, including such an individual who is imprisoned in a State institution; and

(6)

the term privileged electronic communication means—

(A)

any electronic communication between an incarcerated person and a potential, current, or former attorney or legal representative of such a person; and

(B)

any electronic communication between an incarcerated person and the agent of an attorney or legal representative described in subparagraph (A).

Passed the House of Representatives September 21, 2020.

Cheryl L. Johnson,

Clerk.