H.R. 6172House116th Congress (2019-2021)Reconciliation

USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020

Introduced March 10, 2020

AI-Generated Summary

Updated April 14, 2026 at 11:28 AM UTC

The USA FREEDOM Reauthorization Act of 2020 updates the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act to increase court oversight and transparency when the government seeks surveillance orders. It expands the role of independent "amicus curiae" advisers, requires the government to disclose all relevant information and certify that its applications are accurate, and mandates an annual DOJ Inspector General report on the quality of those applications. The changes affect federal intelligence agencies, the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and its Court of Review, and any U.S. persons whose information might be collected.

Key Provisions

  • Courts must now appoint one or more amicus curiae with privacy and civil‑liberties expertise for cases involving novel legal questions, First Amendment concerns, sensitive investigations, new technologies, program reauthorizations, or other civil‑liberties issues.
  • A new definition of “sensitive investigative matter” includes investigations of domestic officials, political candidates, religious or political organizations, the news media, and similarly sensitive domestic entities.
  • Amicus curiae may petition the FISA Court or the Court of Review to certify legal questions for higher‑court review, including the Supreme Court, and must receive written reasons if a petition is denied.
  • Amicus curiae are granted broader access to unredacted court filings, decisions, and classified materials, and may request additional information they deem relevant.
  • Title IX adds a disclosure requirement that the Attorney General or other officials provide the court with all material information and any data that could call the application’s accuracy into question.
  • Section 902 creates a certification process: officials must describe and certify the “accuracy procedures” used to ensure applications are complete and reliable, and judges must find those procedures meet the statutory definition before issuing an order.
  • The DOJ Inspector General must submit an annual public report (subject to declassification review) to the Judiciary and Intelligence committees detailing the number of FISA applications reviewed, errors found, and any unsupported facts.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

26 earlier actions
SenateFloor Latest Action

Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House requests a conference.

June 1, 2020

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

March 10, 2020

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committees on Intelligence (Permanent Select), Oversight and Reform, and Homeland Security, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

March 10, 2020

HouseFloor

Rules Committee Resolution H. Res. 891 Reported to House. Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 68, H.R. 2486 and H.R. 6172. Resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 68, the Senate amendment to H.R. 2486, and H.R. 6172. For S.J. Res. 68, the resolution provides for 1 hour of debate and 1 motion to commit. For the Senate amendment to H.R. 2486, the question will be divided and each portion will have 1 hour of debate. H.R. 6172 will have 1 hour ofdebate and 1 motion to recommit with or without instructions.

March 10, 2020 • 7:39 PM

HouseFloor

Rule H. Res. 891 passed House.

March 11, 2020 • 2:00 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under the provisions of rule H. Res. 891. (consideration: CR H1622-1637)

March 11, 2020 • 3:14 PM

HouseFloor

Rule provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 68, H.R. 2486 and H.R. 6172. Resolution provides for consideration of S.J. Res. 68, the Senate amendment to H.R. 2486, and H.R. 6172. For S.J. Res. 68, the resolution provides for 1 hour of debate and 1 motion to commit. For the Senate amendment to H.R. 2486, the question will be divided and each portion will have 1 hour of debate. H.R. 6172 will have 1 hour ofdebate and 1 motion to recommit with or without instructions.

March 11, 2020 • 3:14 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on H.R. 6172.

March 11, 2020 • 3:15 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House resumed with debate on H.R. 6172.

March 11, 2020 • 3:47 PM

HouseFloor

The previous question was ordered pursuant to the rule.

March 11, 2020 • 4:22 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 278 - 136 (Roll no. 98).

March 11, 2020 • 5:05 PM

HouseFloor

On passage Passed by the Yeas and Nays: 278 - 136 (Roll no. 98). (text: CR H1622-1627)

March 11, 2020 • 5:05 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

March 11, 2020 • 5:05 PM

SenateCalendars

Received in the Senate. Read the first time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under Read the First Time.

March 11, 2020

SenateCalendars

Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 440.

March 12, 2020

SenateFloor

Motion to proceed to consideration of measure made in Senate. (CR S1735)

March 12, 2020

SenateFloor

Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure presented in Senate. (CR S1735)

March 12, 2020

SenateFloor

Motion to proceed to measure considered in Senate. (CR S1748)

March 16, 2020

SenateFloor

Cloture motion on the motion to proceed to the measure withdrawn by unanimous consent in Senate. (CR S1753)

March 16, 2020

SenateFloor

Measure laid before Senate by unanimous consent. (consideration: CR S2388, S2396-2400, S2409-2412, S2414)

May 13, 2020

SenateFloor

Considered by Senate. (consideration: CR S2432-2441)

May 14, 2020

SenateFloor

Passed Senate, under the order of 5/12/20, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, with amendments by Yea-Nay Vote. 80 - 16. Record Vote Number: 92.

May 14, 2020

SenateFloor

Message on Senate action sent to the House.

May 14, 2020

HouseResolving Differences

Mr. Nadler moved that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and request a conference. (consideration: CR H2340-2346; text: CR H2340-2342)

May 28, 2020 • 1:24 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with one hour of debate on the motion to disagree to the Senate amendments and request a conference on H.R. 6172.

May 28, 2020 • 1:24 PM

HouseResolving Differences

On motion that the House disagree to the Senate amendments, and request a conference Agreed to by the Yeas and Nays: 284 - 122 (Roll no. 115).

May 28, 2020 • 3:12 PM

HouseResolving Differences

The Speaker appointed conferees: Nadler, Schiff, Lofgren, Jordan, and Nunes.

May 28, 2020 • 3:12 PM

SenateFloor

Message on House action received in Senate and at desk: House requests a conference.

June 1, 2020

Amendments

5 amendments

Offered to this bill

S.Amdt. 1586May 14, 2020

To amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to prohibit the use of authorities under such Act to surveil United States persons and to prohibit the use of information acquired under such Act in any criminal, civil, or administrative proceeding or as part of any criminal, civil, or administrative investigation, and for other purposes.

Amendment SA 1586, under the order of 5/12/20, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 11 - 85. Record Vote Number: 91. · Sponsored by Rand Paul

S.Amdt. 1584May 13, 2020

To improve the amicus provisions and require the disclosure of relevant information.

Amendment SA 1584, under the order of 5/12/20, having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 77 - 19. Record Vote Number: 90. · Sponsored by Mike Lee

S.Amdt. 1583May 13, 2020

To remove internet website browsing information and search history from scope of authority to access certain business records for foreign intelligence and international terrorism investigations.

Amendment SA 1583, under the order of 5/12/20, not having achieved 60 votes in the affirmative, was not agreed to in Senate by Yea-Nay Vote. 59 - 37. Record Vote Number: 89. · Sponsored by Ron Wyden

H.Amdt. 814Mar 11, 2020

An amendment to change the title to read "A bill to be known as the Federal Initiative to Spy on Americans (FISA) Act".

On agreeing to the Buck amendment (A002) Failed by recorded vote: 35 - 376 (Roll no. 99). · Sponsored by Ken Buck

H.Amdt. 813Mar 11, 2020

Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 891, the amendment printed in House Report 116-415 is adopted.

On agreeing to the Rules amendment (A001) Agreed to without objection.

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Engrossed Amendment SenateIssued May 14, 2020

In the Senate of the United States,

May 14, 2020.

Amendments:

That the bill from the House of Representatives (H.R. 6172) entitled An Act to amend the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 to prohibit the production of certain business records, and for other purposes., do pass with the following

(1)

In subsection (a)(2)(B) of section 602 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1872), as added by section 301(b)(3), insert after section 103(i) the following: , a proceeding in the Foreign Intelligence Court of Review resulting from the petition of an amicus curiae under section 103(i)(7), or a proceeding in which an amicus curiae could have been appointed pursuant to section 103(i)(2)(A).

(2)

In section 302, strike subsections (a) and (b) and insert the following:

(a)

Expansion of appointment authority

(1)

In general

Section 103(i)(2) (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)(2)) is amended—

(A)

by striking subparagraph (A) and inserting the following:

(A)

shall appoint one or more individuals who have been designated under paragraph (1), not less than one of whom possesses privacy and civil liberties expertise, unless the court finds that such a qualification is inappropriate, to serve as amicus curiae to assist the court in the consideration of any application or motion for an order or review that, in the opinion of the court—

(i)

presents a novel or significant interpretation of the law, unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate;

(ii)

presents significant concerns with respect to the activities of a United States person that are protected by the first amendment to the Constitution of the United States, unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate;

(iii)

presents or involves a sensitive investigative matter, unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate;

(iv)

presents a request for approval of a new program, a new technology, or a new use of existing technology, unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate;

(v)

presents a request for reauthorization of programmatic surveillance, unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate; or

(vi)

otherwise presents novel or significant civil liberties issues, unless the court issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate; and

; and

(B)

in subparagraph (B), by striking an individual or organization each place the term appears and inserting one or more individuals or organizations.

(2)

Definition of sensitive investigative matter

Subsection (i) of section 103 (50 U.S.C. 1803) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(12)

Definition

In this subsection, the term sensitive investigative matter means—

(A)

an investigative matter involving the activities of—

(i)

a domestic public official or political candidate, or an individual serving on the staff of such an official or candidate;

(ii)

a domestic religious or political organization, or a known or suspected United States person prominent in such an organization; or

(iii)

the domestic news media; or

(B)

any other investigative matter involving a domestic entity or a known or suspected United States person that, in the judgment of the applicable court established under subsection (a) or (b), is as sensitive as an investigative matter described in subparagraph (A).

.

(b)

Authority to seek review

Subsection (i) of section 103 (50 U.S.C. 1803), as amended by subsection (a) of this section, is amended—

(1)

in paragraph (4)—

(A)

in the paragraph heading, by inserting ; authority after Duties;

(B)

by redesignating subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C) as clauses (i), (ii), and (iii), respectively, and adjusting the margins accordingly;

(C)

in the matter preceding clause (i), as so designated, by striking the amicus curiae shall and inserting the following:

the amicus curiae—

(A)

shall

;

(D)

in subparagraph (A)(i), as so designated, by inserting before the semicolon at the end the following: , including legal arguments regarding any privacy or civil liberties interest of any United States person that would be significantly impacted by the application or motion; and

(E)

by striking the period at the end and inserting the following:

; and

(B)

may seek leave to raise any novel or significant privacy or civil liberties issue relevant to the application or motion or other issue directly impacting the legality of the proposed electronic surveillance with the court, regardless of whether the court has requested assistance on that issue.

;

(2)

by redesignating paragraphs (7) through (12) as paragraphs (8) through (13), respectively; and

(3)

by inserting after paragraph (6) the following:

(7)

Authority to seek review of decisions

(A)

FISA Court decisions

Following issuance of an order under this Act by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, an amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2) may petition the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to certify for review to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review a question of law pursuant to subsection (j). If the court denies such petition, the court shall provide for the record a written statement of the reasons for such denial. Upon certification of any question of law pursuant to this subparagraph, the Court of Review shall appoint the amicus curiae to assist the Court of Review in its consideration of the certified question, unless the Court of Review issues a finding that such appointment is not appropriate.

(B)

FISA Court of Review decisions

An amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2) may petition the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review to certify for review to the Supreme Court of the United States any question of law pursuant to section 1254(2) of title 28, United States Code.

(C)

Declassification of referrals

For purposes of section 602, a petition filed under subparagraph (A) or (B) of this paragraph and all of its content shall be considered a decision, order, or opinion issued by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review described in paragraph (2) of section 602(a).

.

(3)

In section 302(c), redesignate paragraph (2) as paragraph (3).

(4)

In section 302(c), strike paragraph (1) and insert the following:

(1)

Application and materials

Subparagraph (A) of section 103(i)(6) (50 U.S.C. 1803(i)(6)) is amended to read as follows:

(A)

In general

(i)

Right of amicus

If a court established under subsection (a) or (b) appoints an amicus curiae under paragraph (2), the amicus curiae—

(I)

shall have access to, to the extent such information is available to the Government—

(aa)

the application, certification, petition, motion, and other information and supporting materials, including any information described in section 901, submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court in connection with the matter in which the amicus curiae has been appointed, including access to any relevant legal precedent (including any such precedent that is cited by the Government, including in such an application);

(bb)

an unredacted copy of each relevant decision made by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court or the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review in which the court decides a question of law, without regard to whether the decision is classified; and

(cc)

any other information or materials that the court determines are relevant to the duties of the amicus curiae; and

(II)

may make a submission to the court requesting access to any other particular materials or information (or category of materials or information) that the amicus curiae believes to be relevant to the duties of the amicus curiae.

(ii)

Supporting documentation regarding accuracy

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, upon the motion of an amicus curiae appointed under paragraph (2) or upon its own motion, may require the Government to make available the supporting documentation described in section 902.

.

(2)

Clarification of access to certain information

Such section is further amended—

(A)

in subparagraph (B), by striking may and inserting shall; and

(B)

by striking subparagraph (C) and inserting the following:

(C)

Classified information

An amicus curiae appointed by the court shall have access to, to the extent such information is available to the Government, unredacted copies of each opinion, order, transcript, pleading, or other document of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court and the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court of Review, including, if the individual is eligible for access to classified information, any classified documents, information, and other materials or proceedings.

.

(5)

Redesignate section 207 as section 208.

(6)

Insert after section 206 the following:

207.

Disclosure of relevant information; certification regarding accuracy procedures

(a)

Disclosure of relevant information

(1)

In general

The Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) is amended by adding at the end the following:

IX

Disclosure of relevant information

901.

Disclosure of relevant information

The Attorney General or any other Federal officer making an application for a court order under this Act shall provide the court with—

(1)

all information in the possession of the Government that is material to determining whether the application satisfies the applicable requirements under this Act, including any exculpatory information; and

(2)

all information in the possession of the Government that might reasonably—

(A)

call into question the accuracy of the application or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application conducted by the department or agency on whose behalf the application is made; or

(B)

otherwise raise doubts with respect to the findings that are required to be made under the applicable provision of this Act in order for the court order to be issued.

.

(2)

Technical amendment

The table of contents of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 is amended by adding at the end the following:

Title IX—DISCLOSURE OF RELEVANT INFORMATION

Sec. 901. Disclosure of relevant information.

.

(b)

Certification regarding accuracy procedures

(1)

In general

Title IX of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as added by subsection (a), is amended by adding at the end the following:

902.

Certification regarding accuracy procedures

(a)

Definition

In this section, the term accuracy procedures means specific procedures, adopted by the Attorney General, to ensure that an application for a court order under this Act, including any application for renewal of an existing order, is accurate and complete, including procedures that ensure, at a minimum, that—

(1)

the application reflects all information that might reasonably call into question the accuracy of the information or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application, or otherwise raises doubts about the requested findings;

(2)

the application reflects all material information that might reasonably call into question the reliability and reporting of any information from a confidential human source that is used in the application;

(3)

a complete file documenting each factual assertion in an application is maintained;

(4)

the applicant coordinates with the appropriate elements of the intelligence community (as defined in section 3 of the National Security Act of 1947 (50 U.S.C. 3003)), concerning any prior or existing relationship with the target of any surveillance, search, or other means of investigation, and discloses any such relationship in the application;

(5)

before any application targeting a United States person is made, the applicant Federal officer shall document that the officer has collected and reviewed for accuracy and completeness supporting documentation for each factual assertion in the application; and

(6)

the applicant Federal agency establish compliance and auditing mechanisms on an annual basis to assess the efficacy of the accuracy procedures that have been adopted and report such findings to the Attorney General.

(b)

Statement and certification of accuracy procedures

Any Federal officer making an application for a court order under this Act shall include with the application—

(1)

a description of the accuracy procedures employed by the officer or the officer's designee; and

(2)

a certification that the officer or the officer’s designee has collected and reviewed for accuracy and completeness—

(A)

supporting documentation for each factual assertion contained in the application;

(B)

all information that might reasonably call into question the accuracy of the information or the reasonableness of any assessment in the application, or otherwise raises doubts about the requested findings; and

(C)

all material information that might reasonably call into question the reliability and reporting of any information from any confidential human source that is used in the application.

(c)

Necessary finding for court orders

A judge may not enter an order under this Act unless the judge finds, in addition to any other findings required under this Act, that the accuracy procedures described in the application for the order, as required under subsection (b)(1), are actually accuracy procedures as defined in this section.

.

(2)

Technical amendment

The table of contents of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978, as amended by subsection (a), is amended by inserting after the item relating to section 901 the following:

Sec. 902. Certification regarding accuracy procedures.

.

(7)

In section 208, as so redesignated, strike section 501 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1861) and insert: the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act of 1978 (50 U.S.C. 1801 et seq.) (if applicable)

(8)

At the end, add the following:

409.

Annual reporting on accuracy and completeness of applications

Section 603 (50 U.S.C. 1873) is amended—

(1)

by redesignating subsection (e) as subsection (f); and

(2)

by inserting after subsection (d) the following:

(e)

Annual report by DOJ Inspector General on accuracy and completeness of applications

(1)

Definition of appropriate committees of Congress

In this subsection, the term appropriate committees of Congress means—

(A)

the Committee on the Judiciary and the Select Committee on Intelligence of the Senate; and

(B)

the Committee on the Judiciary and the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence of the House of Representatives.

(2)

Report

In April of each year, the Inspector General of the Department of Justice shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress and make public, subject to a declassification review, a report setting forth, with respect to the preceding calendar year, the following:

(A)

A summary of all accuracy or completeness reviews of applications submitted to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court by the Federal Bureau of Investigation.

(B)

The total number of applications reviewed for accuracy or completeness.

(C)

The total number of material errors or omissions identified during such reviews.

(D)

The total number of nonmaterial errors or omissions identified during such reviews.

(E)

The total number of instances in which facts contained in an application were not supported by documentation that existed in the applicable file being reviewed at the time of the accuracy review.

.

Secretary