Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 7566) to amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the punishment for human trafficking in a school zone, and for other…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 7566) to amend title 18, United States Code, to increase the punishment for human trafficking in a school zone, and for other purposes, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members have 5 legislative days to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous materials on H.R. 7566, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, this bill was introduced as an important response to stopping human trafficking and sex trafficking at schools. In fact, its name was Stop Human Trafficking in School Zones. I introduced that bill to stop human trafficking in school zones.
I am glad to be here on the floor of the House to continue this journey in protecting our children. I want to start with the words from the Major Cities Chiefs Association, one of the major supporters of this legislation:
Child sex trafficking is one of the most despicable crimes an individual can commit. Sadly, there are far too many children victimized by this scourge. For example, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received more than 17,200 reports of possible child sex trafficking in 2021.
It is especially troubling that these crimes sometimes occur at schools which should be a safe haven for America's children.
Besides gun violence, human trafficking, sex trafficking is a scourge that takes and destroys the lives of our children.
H.R. 7566 will play an important part in addressing child sex trafficking by establishing additional penalties for offenders who commit these offenses in a school zone or within 1,000 feet of a school-sponsored activity.
We want to be heard on stopping human trafficking and sex trafficking at our schools. And so the No Trafficking Zones Act, which was formerly the Stop Human Trafficking in Schools Act, would ensure that schools across the country, including institutions of higher learning, are safe spaces for learning and academic exploration, free from the menace of sex trafficking.
H.R. 7566 would establish a sentencing enhancement of up to 5 years in several instances: First, in the case of any person who commits the offense of sex trafficking within a primary or secondary school zone or on or within 1,000 feet of the premises of a school-sponsored activity, or premises owned by an institution of higher learning.
Second, for any person who commits the offense of coercion and enticement of a minor enrolled in a primary or a secondary school, or a person enrolled in an institution of higher learning, to travel in interstate or foreign commerce and engage in criminal sexual activity while the minor is in a school zone, or on or within 1,000 feet of premises where a school-sponsored activity is taking place, or while the person is on or within 1,000 feet of the premises owned by the institution of higher education.
And third, for any person who commits the offense of coercion and enticement of a minor using the mail or facilities of interstate or foreign commerce, such as the text and instant messaging or social media platforms which have been used extensively, while the minor who is enrolled in school or an institution of higher education, is in a school zone, or on or within 1,000 feet of premises where a school- sponsored activity is taking place, or premises owned by the institution of higher education.
Human trafficking is one of the greatest threats to human rights in the United States. It destroys a human being's life, and it destroys, forever, a child's life.
In 2020, 11,193 instances of potential human trafficking were reported to the United States National Human Trafficking Hotline, with at least 70 percent of those instances involving sex trafficking, while an estimated 25 percent of all human trafficking victims in this country are in my home State of Texas at any given time, many of whom are minors.
Mr. Speaker, I gave and held the first human trafficking hearing, field hearing from Houston, Texas, with my cosponsor of this legislation, the honorable Mike McCaul. I express my appreciation for his collaboration on this legislation, his enthusiastic collaboration, as he did join me when we held the first hearing on human trafficking in Houston, through the Homeland Security Committee.
What I would say is that Houston had been the epicenter of human trafficking. It was a powerful hearing, and I am glad that we have joined together now to stop human trafficking at schools.
Let me also offer my sympathy to him and his family for their loss.
At least 5,359 trafficking victims and survivors identified through the hotline in 2019 were under the age of 18. And in 2021, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received more than 17,200 reports of suspected child sex trafficking. Many of these young victims of sex trafficking are students in school systems, colleges, trade schools, and universities across the country.
A 2018 survey reported that in Texas, where no trafficking zone legislation passed with bipartisan support earlier this year, 55 percent of young sex trafficking survivors were trafficked while at school or school activities, and 60 percent of trafficked adults said they were first groomed and solicited for trafficking while on school campuses.
That has been a hotbed of opportunity for the scourge of sex traffickers who want to prey upon our innocent children. I am grateful that the legislation in Texas generated out of an effort chaired by Bishop James Dixon, chair of the Houston Sports Authority at the NRG Arena, and began to develop a policy where there would be no trafficking zones around major stadiums and events.
Members of this body know all too well that children are sexually exploited in many ways. Some young people are trafficked by their schoolmates or people they once considered friends. And while the traffickers seek out young people who have noticeable vulnerabilities, including problems at school, conflicts at home, or even the need to fill in a tuition gap caused by the loss of a scholarship, no child or young person is truly safe from the schemes of charismatic traffickers bent on exploiting and destroying young lives.
With the proliferation of social media and the myriad ways in which we communicate with one another, traffickers have put these same means of communication to their own use to find, target, lure, groom, victimize, and exert control over their victims while buyers are using technology to find and purchase sex anonymously.
Traffickers have infiltrated every known form of communication, especially the sites, messaging apps, and social media platforms our children use most frequently, leaving young children more vulnerable to manipulation. Access to the internet, cell phones, and smartphones make it easier, Mr. Speaker, for traffickers and buyers to communicate with children and youth.
Even when they are at school, in class, or attending school-sponsored activities, there are no barriers, no walls, no brick walls, cement walls, steel walls, that can keep a trafficker from getting a precious child.
As a result, trafficking has reached the halls, lunchrooms, gyms, dormitories, and classrooms of schools, colleges, and universities in every corner of the United States of America.
These staggering facts and statistics led me to introduce this bipartisan legislation, the No Trafficking Zones Act, along with Chairman Nadler and Representative McCaul, who I wish to thank for working with me, as I have said previously, as well as Representative Johnson of Louisiana for his amendment that included the protection for young people at institutions of higher education.
We came together in a bipartisan manner to exert the influence necessary to protect America's children collectively. I, again, thank Chairman Nadler, Representative McCaul of Texas, and Representative Johnson of Louisiana. I am delighted to work with them.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this bill, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the issue of stopping human trafficking in school zones is such a crucial issue that I would hope that the focus of our debate today would be on saving the lives of children.
I will just simply make the point, being on the Committee on Homeland Security and chairing the Judiciary subcommittee that deals with Crime, Terrorism, and Homeland Security, that we all can work together for comprehensive immigration reform.
Here we are today, specifically focused and pointed on ensuring that there are no trafficking zones in our country and specifically around our school zones where children cannot be harmed.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record letters from the Major Cities Chiefs Association; Texas State Representative Ron Reynolds; NAACP, Bishop James Dixon, Branch President; Break the Cycle U.S.A., Valerie Winborne, mother of trafficking victim; and Courtney Litvak, surviving--a summary of her experience where she was trafficked.
Major Cities
Chiefs Association,
July 13, 2022.
Hon. Shelia Jackson Lee,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Michael McCaul,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Hon. Jerrold Nadler,
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Rep. Jackson Lee, Rep. Nadler, and Rep. McCaul: I
write on behalf of the Major Cities Chiefs Association (MCCA)
to register our support for H.R. 7566, the Stop Human
Trafficking in School Zones Act. The MCCA is a professional
organization of police executives representing the largest
cities in the United States and Canada.
Child sex trafficking is one of the most despicable crimes
an individual can commit. Sadly, there are far too many
children victimized by this scourge. For example, the
National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received
more than 17,200 reports of possible child sex trafficking in
2021. It's especially troubling that these crimes sometimes
occur at schools, which should be a safe haven for America's
children. H.R. 7566 will play an important part in addressing
child sex trafficking by establishing additional penalties
for offenders who commit these offenses in a school zone or
within 1,000 feet of a school-sponsored activity. These
enhanced penalties will help establish a strong deterrent and
ensure those who commit these heinous acts are held
accountable.
Thank you for your leadership and ongoing commitment to
protecting America's children. Please do not hesitate to
contact me if the MCCA can be of further assistance.
Sincerely.
Jeri Williams,
Chief, Phoenix Police Department,
President, Major Cities Chiefs Association.
Mr. Speaker, I would just simply like to suggest that we can find trafficking in many other places.
I also include in the Record the article: ``Epstein's `ground zero': How the financier reportedly wreaked havoc on Royal Palm Beach High School community.''
[From Business Insider, July 27, 2019]
Epstein's `Ground Zero': How the Financier Reportedly Wreaked Havoc on
the Royal Palm Beach High School Community
(By Kat Tenbarge)
Former Royal Palm Beach High School Assistant Principal
Carolyn Brown told The Palm Beach Post it was an ``open
secret'' that female students were involved in something
suspicious that involved hundreds of dollars in cash and
resulted in girls being bullied for being ``prostitutes'' and
``sugar babies.''
What administers didn't know, or at least didn't act upon,
was that at least 15 underage girls enrolled at the high
school were sexually assaulted by financier and now convicted
sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, according to police reports
obtained by The Palm Beach Post.
Like dozens of other accusations against the shadowy
financier, who is currently being held without bail on
charges of sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy in the
southern district of New York, Epstein's Royal Palm Beach
High accusers say he paid them to give him massages, during
which he would coerce them into sex acts.
Epstein was well aware that his victims would have been
high schoolers, since The Post reported that a Royal Palm
Beach High transcript was found in 2005 in his bedroom desk
drawer at his $12 million Palm Beach estate, next to a
massage table and an armoire filled with sex toys.
One Royal Palm Beach High accuser told police she was 16-
years-old when Epstein asked her to give him a massage while
she was topless. She said she told him she was in high
school. He asked what her favorite sex position was.
Another 16-year-old told police Epstein said he would help
her get into her dream college, New York University, after
reviewing her SAT scores and high school transcript.
Epstein also wrote a note on his own Jeffrey E. Epstein-
branded stationary, Palm Beach police officers found, which
instructed an employee to deliver a dozen roses to an
underage girl who performed in a Royal Palm Beach High play.
Police found the note in Epstein's garbage in 2005.
These findings were some of the evidence brought forward
before Epstein signed a plea deal in 2008 that allowed him to
avoid federal prosecution and serve 13 months of an 18-month
prison sentence, during which he could work from a high-rise
in Palm Beach 12 hours a day, 6 days a week.
Now, Epstein is pleading not guilty to sex trafficking
charges that accuse the elite financier of assaulting upward
of 80 women, many who were underage at the time of the
assault, including some as young as 14. The Palm Beach Post
reports that Epstein recruited girls from several Palm Beach,
Florida high schools, but that Royal Palm Beach High was his
``ground zero.''
The Post reports that girls who were part of Epstein's
underage sexual assault scheme were bullied for being
``prostitutes'' and ``sugar babies,'' which administrators
took notice of when they found $300 in a girl's purse after
she was caught fighting with another female student.
Attorney Adam Horowitz, who has represented some of
Epstein's accusers in eight civil lawsuits, was quoted as
describing the girls who were allegedly targeted as
vulnerable, with some ``living in trailer parks,'' in The
Post.
Epstein asked girls to bring their friends, The Post
reported, paying girls up to $200 for recruiting new victims.
``The younger the better,'' he instructed them, according to
one accuser who was first approached by an adult who worked
for Epstein in 2003 at a resort in Riviera Beach.
That accuser went into her senior year at Royal Palm Beach
High with Epstein's goal in mind, with The Post reporting she
recruited at least eight other underage girls who then
recruited their own friends, including some girls who were on
the verge of homelessness and needed money, badly.
``Knowing what we know now, it's so sad what happened to
those girls,'' Brown, the former assistant principal, told
The Post.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record an article: `` `Open secret' at Royal Palm High School: At least 15 students were lured to Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach mansion'' right out of the school.
Open Secret at Royal Palm High: At Least 15 Students Were Lured to
Jeffrey Epstein's Palm Beach Mansion
(By Lulu Ramadan)
Tucked in the drawer of Jeffrey Epstein's bedroom desk,
near a massage table and a wooden armoire filled with sex
toys, was a teenage girl's Royal Palm Beach High School
transcript.
She was 16 years old when Epstein lured her to his Palm
Beach home set at the end of a dead-end street behind a wall
of hedges.
And she's one of at least 15 girls from Royal Palm Beach
High School who Epstein sexually exploited in that bedroom 15
years ago, police reports reveal.
Epstein, a multimillionaire financier then in his 50s,
lured a procession of girls as young as 14 to his home to
perform nude massages for money, police and court records
say. The massages often ended with Epstein groping or
sexually assaulting the girls.
Epstein's victims attended several Palm Beach County
schools, including Lake Worth Middle and Palm Beach Gardens
High.
But Royal Palm Beach High, with about 3,000 students, many
from the county's rural reaches, was ground zero.
Evidence suggests Epstein knew his victims were school
girls and the signs didn't escape Royal Palm Beach High
administrators. The girls endured teasing and classmates
called them ``prostitutes.'' After two girls fought, an
administrator found one of them had $300 in her purse.
Aside from the student transcript found in Epstein's desk
in 2005, police collected more evidence and witness
statements that suggest Epstein knew his victims were still
school children:
He scrawled a note on Jeffrey E. Epstein-branded stationery
instructing one of his employees to deliver a dozen roses to
a girl who performed in a Royal Palm Beach High play. Police
found the note in his trash.
One 16-year-old girl described to detectives giving Epstein
a massage while she was topless. He asked her about herself
and she told him she was a student at Royal Palm High. He
then asked her which was her favorite sexual position, she
told police.
Another girl, who met Epstein at age 16, said Epstein
reviewed her college applications and SAT scores and promised
to help her get into her dream school, New York University.
Though Palm Beach detectives uncovered these details in
2005, the Palm Beach County State Attorney's Office and U.S.
Attorney's Office in Miami, then headed by Alexander Acosta,
cut Epstein a plea deal that landed him in jail for 13 months
on two charges of soliciting prostitution.
This month, a decade after his release from a Palm Beach
County jail, federal agents in New York arrested Epstein, 66,
on charges of sex trafficking minors. The move came eight
months after a Miami Herald investigation zeroed in on
Acosta's role in Epstein's plea deal and let victims tell
their stories publicly for the first time.
Epstein preyed on dozens of girls, at least 32 identified
at the time by police but about 80 identified in 2018 by the
Herald.
``These girls had never even been to Palm Beach island,''
said Adam Horowitz, an attorney who represented Epstein
victims in eight civil lawsuits filed against the
multimillionaire.
``Some of them were living in trailer parks. This was a
whole new world to them.''
For Epstein: `The younger the better'
Some of the girls told Epstein they were uncomfortable with
being touched during massages, so he asked them to bring
friends instead, police reports and court records reveal.
He paid girls about the same amount, around $200, to
recruit a friend as he paid the girls who stripped down and
performed massages, court records show.
Royal Palm Beach High was a target by coincidence.
``One of Epstein's recruiters managed to infiltrate that
circle,'' Horowitz said.
The ``recruiter'' approached a 17-year-old Royal Palm Beach
High School student in 2003 at a resort in Riviera Beach with
an offer to make $200 for an hour to give a massage, she told
police two years later.
The teen went to Epstein's seven-bedroom home on the
Intracoastal Waterway, where an assistant led her up a
staircase lined with pictures of naked young girls and into
Epstein's bedroom, police say.
In keeping with descriptions to police from many Epstein
victims, the teen found Epstein wearing only a towel, which
he later removed, before lying on a massage table.
Epstein tried to grope her, but she resisted. She told him
she didn't want to be touched, she told detectives.
So Epstein asked her to bring friends to his home for cash
instead. ``The younger the better,'' Epstein said, according
to her police statement.
Going into her senior year at Royal Palm Beach High, the
girl became a conduit to the school, recruiting at least
eight other girls she'd met on campus, court depositions and
police testimonies reveal.
And those girls recruited more girls.
Name-calling and a fight
One Royal Palm Beach High student told detectives in 2005
that she targeted promiscuous teens on campus. Another said
she brought a friend on the verge of homelessness and
strapped for cash.
School administrators knew something unusual was happening,
police reports show.
Students teased the Epstein clique as ``prostitutes'' or
``sugar babies,'' a term for young women who seek
relationships with wealthy, older men, The Post learned from
court depositions and former students.
The tension came to the administration's attention in
February 2005, when a 14-year-old freshman, the first of
Epstein's victims to speak to police, got into a fight on
campus with a girl who called her a ``prostitute,'' police
said.
But the school kept no disciplinary record of the fight and
didn't report anything, police learned in 2005.
At the time, it appeared the girls were making money doing
something nefarious, one former administrator, then-Assistant
Principal Carolyn Brown, said in a brief interview this
month.
It was an ``open secret,'' Brown said, stopping short of
saying whether school administrators knew the girls were paid
for sexual favors.
Brown was subpoenaed to testify in the 2005 criminal case
against Epstein after she found $300 in the 14-year-old's
purse on campus shortly after the fight, court records
reveal.
Administrators considered and then dismissed the idea that
it might be drug money, detectives wrote in a 2005 report.
Brown, who is retired, never spoke to prosecutors. Soon
after her subpoena, federal prosecutors struck Epstein's plea
deal calling for 18 months in county jail, registration as a
sex offender and payments to victims.
It wasn't clear if the principal at the time, Sheila Henry,
knew that more than a dozen students were involved with
Epstein. Henry wasn't mentioned in police reports and could
not be reached for comment.
But two former students reached by The Post, who asked to
stay anonymous, said students gossiped that some girls had
rich, older boyfriends who bought them expensive gifts. Six
other students didn't recall any such talk.
None of the girls knew then what the public knows now: That
a Palm Beach millionaire tapped a local high school to prey
on girls for his sexual gratification.
``Knowing what we know now,'' said Brown, the former
assistant principal, ``it's so sad what happened to those
girls.''
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the article: ``Police: Children recruiting other kids for human trafficking at schools.'' This was in Florida.
[From WKMG ClickOrlando.com, Nov. 1, 2018]
Police: Children Recruiting Other Kids for Human Trafficking at Schools
Florida ranks 3rd in the nation for calls to human trafficking hotline
(By Erik von Ancken)
Orlando, FL.--Human trafficking is real and it is happening
in Central Florida.
Crystal Blanton, co-chair of the Marion County Human
Trafficking Task Force, said she receives thousands of
reports from the National Human Trafficking Hotline every
year.
``Usually the reports are in the thousands, every year,''
Blanton said. ``Thousands of people are being human
trafficked. Right here in Marion County and across the state
of Florida.''
Blanton said it's not like the movies (``Taken'' 2008),
where young girls are taken during their summer vacations by
foreign human traffickers to be sold to sultans or sheiks.
But local children, often as young as 12, are being
recruited into a life of forced prostitution.
``I just think it's the internet, I hate to say it,''
Blanton said. ``Social media has grown the field of human
trafficking. It's easier for these traffickers to make
contact with victims.''
Blanton said traffickers look for vulnerable teenagers
online--runaways, teenagers complaining about their lives and
their parents, young people with drug addictions--and
befriend them.
But human trafficking isn't confined to any race or class,
according to Blanton.
Some victims were on the honor roll headed to college.
``We've had doctors' children who have been intertwined,''
Blanton said.
Blanton also said human traffickers align with students and
use them and their schools as recruiting grounds.
``There are recruiters, juvenile recruiters in the schools,
working with a pimp of some kind, and they are sent out in
the schools and given a job to bring other minors on board,''
Blanton said.
Blanton said the task force has had success educating
Marion County elementary, middle and high school principals
in looking for signs of human trafficking and placing Human
Trafficking Hotline posters in schools.
Mike Lanfersiek, a sergeant at the Human Trafficking Squad
at Orlando's Metropolitan Bureau of Investigation (MBI), said
the definition of human trafficking is forcing a person to
have sex or to work through force, fraud or coercion.
``Human trafficking is quite simply the exploitation of
another person for commercial sex or forced labor,''
Lanfersiek said.
Lanfersiek said once victims, female or male, enter into
the life of human trafficking, they are kept there by their
captor, taking advantage of their vulnerability.
``A vulnerability to substance abuse, the fear of physical
beating, or withholding passports or documents, things like
that,'' Lanfersiek.
Lanfersiek's Human Trafficking Squad has rescued hundreds
of young women and children, often from hotels in the tourist
district of Orange and Osceola Counties.
``Anywhere where the trafficker thinks there might be
demand for commercial sex,'' Lanfersiek said.
Traffickers often set up their prostitution operation at
hotels because they cater to visitors in town for business or
pleasure who are looking for sex, according to Lanfersiek.
Lanfersiek said he just rescued a 15-year-old girl from a
hotel on International Drive.
``She had met someone on the `Plenty of Fish' website and
felt this person was her boyfriend, exploiting her
vulnerabilities, pimping her out,'' Lanfersiek said.
In July, MBI agents arrested three men for luring a teenage
girl through a social media app to an International Drive
hotel and then prostituting her and having sex with her.
In 2016, Orlando police charged two men with the death of a
14-year-old girl who they'd been allegedly prostituting,
driving her to men's homes to have sex.
Lanfersiek said MBI regularly sets up undercover sting
operations to catch traffickers and rescue victims.
MBI analysts spend their days online, searching through
postings by human traffickers looking for victims and
offering them for prostitution.
Lanfersiek offered this warning: If you're coming to
Central Florida looking for a date for sex, you may get a
date with an undercover officer.
Mr. Speaker, my good friend has spoken about the southern border. I include in the Record the article: ``Recruitment and Entrapment Pathways of Minors into Sex Trafficking in Canada and the United States: A Systematic Review.'' Northern border, by the way, that I would offer to say.
[From Trauma, Violence, & Abuse]
Recruitment and Entrapment Pathways of Minors Into Sex Trafficking in
Canada and the United States: A Systematic Review
(By Kyla Baird and Jennifer Connolly)
Abstract--the domestic sex trafficking of minors is
occurring across Canada and the United States. Understanding
the routes into sex trafficking, including the way
traffickers target, recruit and enmesh youth in the sex trade
is invaluable information for service providers and law
makers developing prevention and intervention initiatives.
This review synthesized research on the exploitation
processes and tactics employed by traffickers in the sex
trafficking of domestic minors in Canada and the US. The
authors comprehensively and systematically
searched five electronic databases and obtained additional
publications and grey literature through a backward search of
the references cited in articles reviewed for inclusion.
Inclusionary criteria included: Studies published in the
English language between January 1990 and June 2020
containing original research with quantitative or qualitative
data on the recruitment or pathways into sex trafficking for
minors trafficked within the US and Canada. The search
yielded 23 eligible studies. The synthesis of the studies in
the review converged on the notion of sexual exploitation
occurring on a continuum comprising of three components; the
recruitment context, entrapment strategies utilized by
traffickers, and enmeshment tactics used to prolong
exploitation. Findings highlight the significant physical,
psychological and emotional hurdles faced by youth victims of
sex trafficking and point to the importance of comprehensive
and holistic approaches to prevention and intervention
practices.
Human trafficking is a global problem that has garnered
significant international and national attention over the
past 2 decades. In 2000, 140 countries signed onto the
Palermo protocol agreeing that human trafficking is a
significant human rights violation and a criminal offense
that requires prevention, the protection of vulnerable
populations, and the prosecution of violators of the
protocol. In North America, both Canada and the United States
signed this protocol and have since passed legislation and
policies to combat human trafficking. Sex trafficking became
criminalized in Canada in 2005 when human trafficking entered
the criminal code under section 279.01 and in the United
States in 2000 with the passing of the Trafficking Victims
Protection Act (TVPA). Sex trafficking is one of the most
common forms of human trafficking consisting of the
recruitment and exploitation of an individual through the use
of threats, force, coercion, deception, or abuse of power for
the purpose of a commercial sex act (United Nations Office on
Drugs and Crime, 2014). A commercial sex act, as defined by
the American TVPA (2000), is ``any sexual act for which
something of value is given or received.'' Common examples
include prostitution, pornography, sexual massage parlors,
and strip clubs. Commercial sex acts may be exchanged for
money, drugs, shelter, clothing, or food (Cole & Anderson,
2013; Kotrla, 2010). Sex trafficking is rampant across the
United States and Canada (Clawson et al., 2009; Dalley,
2010). Despite various political and social differences
between these countries, they are united on the front of
combating sex trafficking within their borders and expanding
research to support effective evidence-based prevention and
intervention strategies.
Sex Trafficking of Minors (STM)
Minors (under the age of 18) are overrepresented among
victims of sex trafficking, with the majority of victims
recruited between 12 and 14 years of age (Jordan et al.,
2013; Smith et al., 2009). Given the elevated risk for
minors, research and legislation have begun to focus on the
specific issue of the STM. Consequently, our understanding of
the risks for recruitment, experiences, and needs of underage
victims is growing, and important policy actions have been
taken. In the past decade, both Canada and the United
States have passed legislation, reformed laws, and enacted
policies to combat issues of the STM. Legislative changes
in both Canada and the United States have transformed the
way victims are viewed and treated by law enforcement.
More specifically, American and Canadian federal consent
laws declared minors under the age of 18 unable to consent
to commercial sex and have shifted the lens of law
enforcement from criminalizing youth in the sex trade to
viewing them as victims (Adelson, 2008; Franchino-Olsen,
2019). Language in research on STM has followed suit,
shifting from calling underage victims of sex trafficking
``teen prostitutes'' to ``victims of STM.''
On the basis of age, youth from all sectors of society are
at risk for recruitment into sex trafficking. Developmental
vulnerabilities such as identity formation, the need for
belonging, desire for autonomy, desire for romantic
relationships, and evolving problem-solving skills make them
easily exploitable by traffickers who appeal to these
vulnerabilities (Schwartz, 2015). Based on the growing
literature, some youths are at greater risk for recruitment
than others. Several risk factors for STM have been
identified, including involvement with child protective
services, history of childhood sexual abuse, homelessness,
physical and emotional abuse, neglect, exposure to intimate
partner violence, problematic relationships with caregivers,
drug and alcohol abuse, and teen dating violence (Choi, 2015;
Countryman-Roswurm, 2012; Countryman-Roswurm & Bolin, 2014;
Farley et al., 2005; Franchino-Olsen, 2019; Kotrla, 2010;
Landers et al., 2017). Traffickers are known to be deeply
perceptive of the developmental vulnerabilities of youth and
target their unmet needs through strategic recruitment
methods.
Simply being a girl places a youth at an elevated risk
status relative to boys (Estes & Weiner, 2001), with 98% of
victims being women and girls (International Labour
Organization, 2012). Adolescent girls are particularly
vulnerable to sexual exploitation due to social norms that
cast gendered expectations and power imbalances in relation
to sexual activities, with boys being expected to take sexual
initiatives. Sexual inexperience, desire for romantic
relationships, and insecurity among young girls can set the
stage for manipulation and exploitation by adolescent boys or
men (Hanna, 2002).
Based on the differential needs and situations of youth,
the recruitment and exploitation of underage populations are
thought to differ from adult populations (Bouche & Shady,
2017; Dank et al., 2014). While it may be riskier to traffic
a youth due to increased policing efforts in protecting
minors and higher sentences for STM, it has been suggested
that these risks are offset by the youth being easier to
manipulate and control and being highly desired by
purchasers, bringing in more money for the trafficker (Dank
et al., 2014). Compared to adults, youths have greater needs
for protection, less life experience, and are dependent on
adults for basic needs such as food and shelter, making them
more vulnerable to traffickers who vow to provide care,
protection, and basic needs (Bruhns et al., 2018; Cole &
Anderson, 2013). Given youths' physical and emotional
dependency on adults, some research have suggested youths are
more trusting and less able to identify traffickers' coercive
and manipulative strategies to entrap them (Cole & Sprang,
2015). Adult victims, on the other hand, are generally less
psychologically dependent on their trafficker (Bouche &
Shady, 2017). In addition, literature on the trafficking of
adults identify several risk factors that are more unique to
adult victim populations, including needing to financially
support dependents, low educational attainment, and having
few job skills (Holger-Ambrose et al., 2013). Despite
differences in adult and underage victim populations, much of
the extant research on recruitment for sex trafficking have
pooled both underage and adult participants or examined
victimized adults only, limiting our understanding of the STM
specifically (Reid, 2014). In order to translate sex
trafficking research into evidence-based initiatives to
combat the STM, it is important for research to delineate the
specific ways in which traffickers target and recruit youth
into the sex trade. The current study aims to synthesize
research that focuses on youth recruitment into sex
trafficking in North America.
North American Context of Sex Trafficking
There have been few attempts to estimate the prevalence of
the STM in North America; however, available statistics are
often ``guesstimates'' rather than reliable rates (Franchino-
Olsen et al., 2020; Stransky & Finkelhor, 2012). Available
estimates for STM most commonly come from the United States,
where the rates range from 1,400 to upward of 199,000 victims
(Banks & Kyckelhahn, 2011; Estes & Weiner, 2001; Snyder &
Sickmund, 2006; U.S. Department of Justice, 2004), with the
most commonly cited study estimating upward of 325,000
children at risk for sexual exploitation in the United States
each year (Estes & Weiner, 2001). However, available
statistics are problematic as they often fail to distinguish
between domestic and international victims, are based on
varying definitions of sex trafficking, are geographically
limited, and utilize nonreplicable, unreliable methodologies
(Fedina et al., 2019; Franchino-Olsen et al., 2020; Stransky
& Finkelhor, 2012). Researcher error aside, the very nature
of the sex trafficking industry presents barriers to the
acquisition of accurate statistics. Most significant among
these is the fact that trafficking occurs largely
underground, within criminal networks that are transient,
discrete, and often invisible, even to law enforcement
(Duger, 2015; Franchino-Olsen et al., 2020). Difficulty in
obtaining estimates of an invisible crime is compounded by
the fact that many individuals victimized by sex trafficking
do not view themselves as victims of a crime and therefore do
not report it in any official capacity (Mcclain & Garrity,
2011). Despite flawed and unreliable statistics, STM is known
to be widespread across Canada and the United States,
requiring immediate action and sound research to uncover
trends and pathways of youth into sex trafficking including
the way traffickers target, recruit, and enmesh youth in the
sex trade (Clawson et al., 2009; Cole & Sprang, 2015; Dalley,
2010).
While STM defies geographic borders, a country's economic
environment, geographic positioning, laws, employment rates,
per capita income, and historical events shape the industry
and individual risk for recruitment (Hepburn & Simon, 2010;
C. O'Brien, 2009). As a result, trends in STM within North
America are different from the European context. The
permeable borders between European countries allow for easy
international movement between proximal countries (Lindstrom,
2004). For example, one report found only 5% of all
identified sex-trafficked victims in the United Kingdom (UK)
were originally from the UK, which is a stark contrast to the
picture of trafficking in NA where the majority of victims
are domestic persons (Baird, McDonald & Connolly, 2020; Banks
& Kyckelhahn, 2011; Mitchell et al., 2010; Royal Canadian
Mounted Police [RCMP], Human Trafficking National
Coordination Centre, 2014; Serious Organised Crime Agency,
2013). Given sex trafficking industries vary between
countries based on differences in social, geographical,
cultural, economic, and historical factors, it is not
appropriate to generalize understandings of STM across
countries that are dissimilar across these factors (Hepburn &
Simon, 2010). As such, the current study narrowed its focus
to systematically reviewing the recruitment of minors for sex
trafficking in two countries, Canada and the
United States both of which have similar cultural, economic,
geographic, and historical contexts.
The domestic STM is of major concern within Canada and the
United States (Clawson et al., 2009; Dalley, 2010). While
both countries adhere to the standards of affluent and
profitable nations that are alluring destinations for
international sex traffickers, research consistently shows
that domestic youth (i.e., youth trafficked within their
country of origin) comprise the majority of underage victims
in their respective countries (Baird et al., 2020; Kotrla,
2010; RCMP, Human Trafficking National Coordination Centre,
2014). Due to the risks and challenges associated with
transporting victims across borders, some research suggests
that domestic youths are preferred by traffickers (Smith et
al., 2009). In summarizing the literature on recruitment and
entrapment, it is important to distinguish between
international and domestic sex trafficking due to the nuanced
differences in the process of exploitation. Comparatively,
researchers suggest domestic sex traffickers more often
utilize interpersonal relationships and domestic violence to
entrap their target and international traffickers rely upon
kidnapping, parents' selling their children, and offering
false promises of jobs abroad for entrapment (Cecchet &
Thoburn, 2014). Understanding the specific ways American and
Canadian youths are recruited by traffickers and exploited
domestically is important in developing effective prevention
and intervention strategies.
Mr. Speaker, then let me offer this point of importance. The victims are not here on this floor, but we must carry their story to this floor, to ensure that we do not see another victim.
So I will offer these words from Courtney. Courtney has made it her mission to tell her story and speak out to spread awareness of human trafficking and help shape policy to protect other young people from falling victim to the schemes of human traffickers and to hold traffickers accountable.
She became entangled in sex trafficking while still in school. Despite what some believe about victims of human trafficking, she grew up in a loving, church-going family, in a safe neighborhood, and attended an upscale suburban high school in Texas.
At the age of 17, she was under the control of her first trafficker. She was being advertised for illicit sex on websites like Backpage. A trafficker with ties to her high school used fellow students to prey upon her and use her vulnerabilities to their advantage, offering her friendship and support when she felt she had none, meanwhile drawing her gradually and deeper into the life. She was actually groomed by two different organized crime networks simultaneously, and each groomer chatted with her through social media and messaging. One network even invested in grooming Courtney for almost an entire year.
Her first trafficker picked her up from school. She was unenrolled from her school and had her entire life uprooted in a desperate attempt to intervene in an exploitation.
She returned back to her hometown where days after turning 18, she was taken from her home by another invested trafficker. She soon realized she was in this world, and over and over again she was used and transported from Texas to California to Las Vegas, passing from one hand to the next.
What a vile life. She is willing to share this life.
It is extremely important that we pass this legislation and that we address the question of what can happen to our innocent children.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume for closing.
Let me express my appreciation to those who sacrificed to share with us their stories and those who worked on this very important effort: Bishop James Dixon, II, the No Trafficking Zone cofounder and senior pastor of the Community of Faith Church, Branch President of the NAACP, Houston Branch; Jacquelyn Aluotto, NTZ cofounder, founder of Real Beauty Real Women; and Courtney Litvak, a member of the U.S. Advisory Council on Human Trafficking, who will participate in unveiling their annual report later this week; and so many others who have really helped. Jacquelyn Aluotto was someone who inspirationally wanted to lead us in this direction and worked very hard.
Each of us has a duty to protect young people, whether it be from drugs, gun violence, or sex traffickers. Our children deserve to be safe, and parents should know their children will be safe when they put them on the school bus or move them into their new dorms.
To be sure, H.R. 7566, the No Trafficking Zones Act, provides increased accountability for anyone who would dare interrupt or interfere with a young person's ability to obtain an education and lay the foundation for a productive future for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
In drafting this legislation, I am grateful for the contribution of the No Trafficking Zone Initiative and all of those whose names I have called, including those names not called, those victims silenced, or lives lost or destroyed.
Mr. Speaker, I urge all my colleagues to support H.R. 7566. This is a great day for helping to stop sex trafficking, human trafficking, where our children should be most safe, and that is at our schools.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 7566, the bipartisan ``No Trafficking Zones Act,'' would ensure that schools across the country, including institutions of higher education, are safe spaces for learning and academic exploration--free from the menace of sex trafficking.
H.R. 7566 would establish a sentencing enhancement of up to five years in several instances:
First, in the case of any person who commits the offense of sex trafficking within a primary or secondary school zone, or on, or within 1,000 feet of the premises of a school-sponsored activity or premises owned by an institution of higher education;
Second, for any person who commits the offense of coercion and enticement of a minor enrolled in a primary or secondary school or a person enrolled in an institution of higher education--to travel in interstate or foreign commerce and engage in criminal sexual activity-- while the minor is in a school zone, or on, or within 1,000 feet of, premises where a school-sponsored activity is taking place or while the person is on, or within 1,000 feet of, premises owned by the institution of higher education;
And, third, for any person who commits the offense of coercion and enticement of a minor using the mail or facilities of interstate or foreign commerce--such as text and instant messaging or social media platforms--while the minor who is enrolled in school or an institution of higher education, is in a school zone, or on, or within 1,000 feet of, premises where a school-sponsored activity is taking place or premises owned by an the institution of higher education.
Human trafficking is one of the greatest threats to human rights in the United States. In 2020, 11,193 instances of potential human trafficking were reported to the United States National Human Trafficking Hotline with at least 70 percent of those instances involving sex trafficking, while an estimated 25 percent of all human trafficking victims in the country are in my home state of Texas at any given time--many of whom are minors. That is why the Stop Human Trafficking in School Zones Act that we are debating is so important to pass.
At least 5,359 of trafficking victims and survivors identified through the hotline in 2019 were under the age of 18, and in 2021, the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children received more than 17,200 reports of suspected child sex trafficking.
Many of these young victims of sex trafficking are students in school systems, colleges, trade schools, and universities across the country.
A 2018 survey reported that in Texas--where No Trafficking Zone legislation passed with bipartisan support earlier this year--55 percent of young sex trafficking survivors were trafficked while at school or school activities and 60 percent of trafficked adults said they were first groomed and solicited for trafficking while on school campuses.
Members of this body know all too well that children are sexually exploited in many ways. Some young people are trafficked by their schoolmates or people they once considered friends.
And while traffickers seek out young people who have noticeable vulnerabilities--including problems at school, conflicts at home, or even the need to fill in a tuition gap caused by the loss of a scholarship--no child or young person is truly safe from the schemes of charismatic traffickers bent on exploiting and destroying young lives.
With the proliferation of social media and the myriad ways in which we communicate with one another, traffickers have put these same means of communication to their own use--to find, target, lure, groom, victimize, and exert control over their victims. While buyers are using technology to find and purchase sex anonymously.
Traffickers have infiltrated every known form of communication-- especially the sites, messaging apps, and social media platforms our children use most frequently--leaving young people more vulnerable to manipulation.
Access to the internet, cell phones, and smartphones makes it easier for traffickers and buyers to communicate with children and youth--even when they are at school, in class, or attending school-sponsored activities.
As a result, trafficking has reached the halls, lunchrooms, gyms, dormitories, and classrooms of schools, colleges, and universities in every corner of this nation.
These staggering facts and statistics led me to introduce this bipartisan legislation, the No Trafficking Zones Act, known as the Stop Human Trafficking in School Zones Act, along with Chairman Nadler and Representative McCaul, who I wish to thank for working with me, as well as Representative Johnson of Louisiana for his amendment, that included the protections for young people at institutions of higher education.
Each of us has a duty to protect young people--whether it be from drugs, gun violence, or sex traffickers. Our children deserve to be safe; and parents should know their children will be safe when they put them on the school bus or move them into their new dorms.
To be sure, H.R. 7566, the No Trafficking Zones Act, provides increased accountability for anyone who would dare interrupt or interfere with a young person's ability to obtain an education and lay the foundation for a productive future--for the purpose of sexual exploitation.
In drafting this legislation, I am grateful for the contributions of the No Trafficking Zone Initiative, Bishop James Dixon, Jacquelyn Aluotto, and Courtney Litvak, who is also a member of the U.S. Advisory Council on Human Trafficking and will participate in unveiling their Annual Report later this week.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.