← Back to Bills
H.R. 10594House119th Congress (2025-2027)In Committee

Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2026

Sponsored by August PflugerRep. August Pfluger (R-TX)
Introduced September 24, 2026

AI-Generated Summary

Updated September 30, 2026 at 5:54 AM UTC

The Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2026 directs the Secretary of Homeland Security to launch prize competitions that promote research on making artificial‑intelligence systems more understandable (interpretability) and more resistant to malicious attacks (adversarial robustness). The competitions must involve input from agencies such as Commerce, the National Institute of Standards and Technology, the National Cyber Director, and the National Science Foundation, and they target AI products that are commercially available or widely used. The law also requires a report to Congress on the competition results and provides up to $10 million in funding for fiscal years 2027‑2031.

Key Provisions

  • Within 270 days of enactment, DHS must start at least one prize competition to advance AI interpretability for commercial or widely used AI products.
  • A separate prize competition must also be started within 270 days to develop AI models that are adversarially robust for high‑impact, high‑risk government or industry applications.
  • Both competitions must be designed with input from the Secretaries of Commerce and Homeland Security, the NIST director, the National Cyber Director, the NSF director, and relevant AI industry experts (and, for robustness, heads of relevant federal agencies).
  • The Secretary sets the competition structure (phases, submission types) and evaluation criteria, focusing on broad applicability, practical value, and potential to create standards.
  • Within 180 days after the first competition ends, DHS must report to the House and Senate Homeland Security committees on findings, gaps, and recommended congressional actions.
  • The act authorizes $10 million for these activities, to be spent over FY2027‑2031.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

1 earlier action
HouseIntro Referral Latest Action

Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Homeland Security Committee

September 24, 2026

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

September 24, 2026

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Homeland Security.

Homeland Security Committee

September 24, 2026

Bill Text

Latest available legislative text

Reading Mode
Latest
Raw Text PDF XML
Introduced in HouseIssued September 24, 2026

I

119th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 10594

IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES

September 24, 2026

Mr. Pfluger (for himself, Mr. Harder of California, Ms. King-Hinds, Mr. Downing, and Mr. Webster of Florida) introduced the following bill; which was referred to the Committee on Homeland Security

A BILL

To require the Secretary of Homeland Security to carry out prize competitions to advance the science of interpretability and to develop adversarial robustness with respect to artificial intelligence products, and for other purposes.

1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Reliable Artificial Intelligence Research Act of 2026.

2.

Definitions

In this Act:

(1)

Adversarial robustness

The term adversarial robustness means the degree to which an artificial intelligence model is able to resist attacks that would induce it to produce incorrect, restricted, or harmful outputs, while maintaining integrity, reliability, and privacy.

(2)

Artificial intelligence

The term artificial intelligence has the meaning given the term in section 5002 of the National Artificial Intelligence Initiative Act of 2020 (15 U.S.C. 9401).

(3)

Interpretability

The term interpretability means the degree to which humans are able to accurately understand how an artificial intelligence model makes decisions and considers inputs and how the outputs or behaviors of the model respond to a change in the inputs.

(4)

Red-teaming

The term red-teaming means a structured, interactive, and adversarial process to test an artificial intelligence system by simulating real-world actions to find vulnerabilities or flaws in the system.

(5)

Secretary

The term Secretary means the Secretary of Homeland Security.

3.

Prize competition for artificial intelligence interpretability research

(a)

Prize competition required

Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Homeland Security shall commence carrying out at least 1 prize competition under section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719) to advance the science of interpretability in a manner relevant to commercially available or widely used artificial intelligence products.

(b)

Consultation

In carrying out the prize competition required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—

(1)

the Secretary of Commerce;

(2)

the Director of the National Institute of Standards and Technology;

(3)

the National Cyber Director;

(4)

the Director of the National Science Foundation; and

(5)

any industry expert from the artificial intelligence sector in the United States that the Secretary considers relevant.

(c)

Structure and evaluation criteria

(1)

In general

The Secretary shall develop the structure and evaluation criteria for a prize competition carried out under subsection (a) in accordance with the primary purpose described in that subsection.

(2)

Competition structure

The Secretary may—

(A)

structure a competition under subsection (a) into 1 or more phases, including submission of interpretability frameworks, submission of interpretable artificial intelligence models, and unique basic research; and

(B)

open these phases to the same, or to distinct, contestant pools.

(3)

Evaluation considerations

In developing the evaluation criteria for the frameworks, models, or methods submitted for a prize competition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider—

(A)

the degree to which a submission advances broadly applicable principles of artificial intelligence interpretability;

(B)

the practical value of a submission in making artificial intelligence more understandable and reliable in high-risk, high-value use cases; and

(C)

the likelihood that the unique research submitted will create standards for artificial intelligence interpretability in the government or industry.

(d)

Program administration

The Secretary may enter into contracts, cooperative agreements, or other agreements with for-profit or nonprofit entities or State, territorial, local, or Tribal agencies to design and administer any prize competition carried out under subsection (a).

4.

Prize competition for artificial intelligence adversarial robustness research

(a)

Prize competition required

Not later than 270 days after the date of enactment of this Act, the Secretary shall commence carrying out at least 1 prize competition under section 24 of the Stevenson-Wydler Technology Innovation Act of 1980 (15 U.S.C. 3719) to develop capable artificial intelligence models that are designed to exhibit adversarial robustness in circumstances necessary for at least 1 high-impact, high-risk application in government or industry.

(b)

Consultation

In carrying out a prize competition required by subsection (a), the Secretary shall consult with—

(1)

the Secretary of Commerce;

(2)

the Director of the Institute of Standards and Technology;

(3)

the National Cyber Director;

(4)

the Director of the National Science Foundation;

(5)

any industry expert from the artificial intelligence sector in the United States that the Secretary considers relevant; and

(6)

the head of any Federal agency who has authority or expertise in a high-impact, high-risk application of artificial intelligence that could be an appropriate subject for a prize competition under subsection (a).

(c)

Structure and evaluation criteria

(1)

In general

The Secretary shall develop the structure and evaluation criteria for a prize competition carried out under subsection (a) in accordance with the primary purpose described in that subsection.

(2)

Competition structure

The Secretary may—

(A)

structure a competition under subsection (a) into 1 or more phases, including submission of adversarial robustness frameworks, submission of artificial intelligence models, and red-teaming; and

(B)

open these phases to the same, or to distinct, contestant pools.

(3)

Evaluation considerations

In developing the evaluation criteria for the frameworks, models, or methods submitted for a prize competition under subsection (a), the Secretary shall consider—

(A)

the degree to which a submission advances broadly applicable principles of artificial intelligence robustness; and

(B)

the practical value of the submission in reducing the risk of adversarial attacks in high-risk, high-value use cases of artificial intelligence.

(d)

Program administration

The Secretary may enter into contracts, cooperative agreements, or other agreements with for-profit or nonprofit entities or State, territorial, local, or Tribal agencies to design and administer any prize competition carried out under subsection (a).

5.

Tracking and reporting

(a)

In general

Not later than 180 days after the date on which the first prize competition concludes, the Secretary shall submit to the appropriate congressional committees a report that includes—

(1)

an evaluation of how the results of the competitions inform the fields of interpretability and adversarial robustness;

(2)

an assessment of any gaps in these fields identified by the Secretary over the course of the competitions; and

(3)

any suggested action that Congress should take to advance the fields of interpretability, adversarial robustness, and any related research.

(b)

Appropriate congressional committees defined

In this section, the term appropriate congressional committees means—

(1)

the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs of the Senate; and

(2)

the Committee on Homeland Security of the House of Representatives.

6.

Appropriations

There is authorized to be appropriated to the Secretary to carry out this section $10,000,000 for the period of fiscal years 2027 through 2031.