H.R. 6556House119th Congress (2025-2027)Passed House

Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act

Introduced December 10, 2025

AI-Generated Summary

Updated December 13, 2025 at 7:15 PM UTC

The Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act tightens rules around allowing concentration‑limit waivers for mergers involving banks that have failed or are in danger of failing. It says agencies can only grant such waivers when clear, convincing evidence shows the merger is needed to avoid serious economic disruption or harm to financial stability, and only if no qualified bid from another institution is available. The law also adds new reporting and transparency requirements for any waiver granted.

Key Provisions

  • Waivers of concentration‑limit exceptions for failed‑bank mergers are allowed only if an agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that the merger is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or financial instability and no qualified bid exists.
  • A “qualified bid” is defined as an offer from a well‑capitalized and well‑managed institution that would leave the resulting bank well‑capitalized after the merger.
  • When a waiver is granted, the responsible agency and the FDIC must submit a written report to the House and Senate banking committees within 30 days, explaining the justification, alternative bids considered, why they were not chosen, and any suggested legislative changes; the report must also be posted publicly.
  • The FDIC may not consider any bid that would violate the concentration‑limit rules when determining the least‑cost option for the Deposit Insurance Fund.

Legislative Activity

Stay on top of the latest movement without scrolling through every action

13 earlier actions
SenateIntro Referral Latest Action

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

July 15, 2026

View full timeline
HouseIntro Referral

Introduced in House

December 10, 2025

HouseIntro Referral

Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.

December 10, 2025

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

December 16, 2025

HouseCommittee

Committee Consideration and Mark-up Session Held

December 17, 2025

HouseCommittee

Ordered to be Reported (Amended) by the Yeas and Nays: 51 - 0.

December 17, 2025

HouseCommittee

Reported (Amended) by the Committee on Financial Services. H. Rept. 119-475.

February 2, 2026

HouseCalendars

Placed on the Union Calendar, Calendar No. 406.

February 2, 2026

HouseFloor

Mr. Hill (AR) moved to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended.

July 14, 2026 • 3:03 PM

HouseFloor

Considered under suspension of the rules. (consideration: CR H4438-4441)

July 14, 2026 • 3:03 PM

HouseFloor

DEBATE - The House proceeded with forty minutes of debate on H.R. 6556.

July 14, 2026 • 3:03 PM

HouseFloor

Passed/agreed to in House: On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote.

July 14, 2026 • 3:16 PM

HouseFloor

On motion to suspend the rules and pass the bill, as amended Agreed to by voice vote. (text: CR H4438-4440)

July 14, 2026 • 3:16 PM

HouseFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

July 14, 2026 • 3:16 PM

SenateIntro Referral

Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.

July 15, 2026

Floor Debate

3 members

What members said about H.R. 6556 on the floor

2 Republicans1 Democrat
Monica De La Cruz
Rep. Monica De La CruzR-TX-15 · Dec 16, 2025

Under clause 7 of rule XII, sponsors were added to public bills and resolutions, as follows: H.R. 116: Mr. Jack. H.R. 154: Mr. Landsman. H.R. 158: Mr. Landsman. H.R. 220: Ms. Escobar. H.R. 251: Mr.…

J. French Hill
Rep. J. French HillR-AR-2 · Jul 14, 2026

Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 6556) to prohibit the use of certain concentration limit exceptions with respect to mergers involving a failed bank unless the…

Stephen F. Lynch
Rep. Stephen F. LynchD-MA-8 · Jul 14, 2026

Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise in support of H.R. 6556, the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act, which I introduced in December 2025. Mr. Speaker, I…

Bill Text

4 versions available

Reading Mode
Latest
Referred in SenateIssued July 15, 2026

IIB

119th CONGRESS

2d Session

H. R. 6556

IN THE SENATE OF THE UNITED STATES

July 15, 2026

Received; read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs

AN ACT

To prohibit the use of certain concentration limit exceptions with respect to mergers involving a failed bank unless the applicable agency determines such use is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and for other purposes.


1.

Short title

This Act may be cited as the Failing Bank Acquisition Fairness Act.

2.

Concentration limit exceptions only available to avoid serious adverse economic or financial effects

(a)

Concentration limits with respect to deposits

(1)

Federal Deposit Insurance Act

The Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1811 et seq.) is amended—

(A)

in section 18(c)(13)—

(i)

by amending subparagraph (B) to read as follows:

(B)

Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an interstate merger transaction if—

(i)

such interstate merger transaction involves 1 or more insured depository institutions in default or in danger of default and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from a company that is not subject to the prohibition in subparagraph (A); or

(ii)

the Corporation provides assistance under section 13 to facilitate such interstate merger transaction and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from a company that is not subject to the prohibition in subparagraph (A).

; and

(ii)

in subparagraph (C)—

(I)

in clause (i), by striking and at the end;

(II)

in clause (ii), by striking the period at the end and inserting a semicolon; and

(III)

by adding at the end the following:

(iii)

the term qualified bid means an application, proposed application, or bid from a company where—

(I)

if applicable, the company, any affiliate insured depository institution, and any affiliate depository institution holding company is well capitalized and well managed, as of the date of the application, proposed application, or bid; and

(II)

upon consummation of the transaction, the resulting insured depository institution is well capitalized;

(iv)

the term well capitalized—

(I)

with respect to an insured depository institution, has the meaning given such term in section 38(b) (12 U.S.C. 1831o(b));

(II)

with respect to a bank holding company, has the meaning given such term in section 2(o)(1)(B) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841(o)(1)(B));

(III)

with respect to a savings and loan holding company, has the meaning given such term in section 238.2 of title 12, Code of Federal Regulations; and

(IV)

with respect to a company that is not an insured depository institution, bank holding company, or savings and loan holding company, means maintaining equity capital that the Corporation determines is commensurate with the capital maintained by an insured depository institution that is well capitalized; and

(v)

the term well managed has the meaning given such term in section 2(o)(9) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841(o)(9)).

; and

(B)

in section 44, by amending subsection (e) to read as follows:

(e)

Exception for Banks in Default or in Danger of Default

(1)

General exception

The responsible agency may, without regard to paragraph (1), (3), (4), or (5) of subsection (b) or paragraph (2), (4), or (5) of subsection (a), approve an application under subsection (a)(1) for approval of a merger transaction if—

(A)

the merger transaction involves 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default; or

(B)

the Corporation provides assistance under section 13(c) to facilitate such merger transaction.

(2)

Concentration limit exception

The responsible agency may, without regard to subsection (b)(2), approve an application under subsection (a)(1) for approval of a merger transaction if—

(A)

the merger transaction involves 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)(2); or

(B)

the Corporation provides assistance under section 13(c) to facilitate such merger transaction and the responsible agency determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed interstate merger transaction is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b)(2).

(3)

Qualified bid defined

In this subsection, the term qualified bid has the meaning given that term in section 18(c)(13)(C).

.

(2)

Bank Holding Company Act of 1956

The Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.) is amended—

(A)

in section 3(d), by amending paragraph (5) to read as follows:

(5)

Exception for banks in default or in danger of default

(A)

General exception

The Board may, without regard to subparagraph (B) or (D) of paragraph (1) or paragraph (3), approve an application pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) if—

(i)

the application is for an acquisition of 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default; or

(ii)

the application is for an acquisition with respect to which assistance is provided under section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

(B)

Concentration limit exception

The Board may, without regard to paragraph (2), approve an application pursuant to paragraph (1)(A) if—

(i)

the application is for the acquisition of 1 or more banks in default or in danger of default and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2); or

(ii)

the application is for an acquisition with respect to which assistance is provided under section 13(c) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2).

(C)

Qualified bid defined

In this paragraph, the term qualified bid has the meaning given that term in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act.

; and

(B)

in section 4(i)(8), by amending subsection (B) to read as follows:

(B)

Exception

Subparagraph (A) shall not apply to an acquisition if—

(i)

such acquisition involves an insured depository institution in default or in danger of default and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2); or

(ii)

the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides assistance under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act to facilitate such acquisition and the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in paragraph (2).

.

(b)

Concentration limit with respect to consolidated liabilities

Section 14(c) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1852(c)) is amended—

(1)

by redesignating paragraphs (1), (2), and (3) as subparagraphs (A), (B), and (C), respectively;

(2)

by striking With the and inserting the following:

(1)

In general

With the

; and

(3)

by adding at the end the following:

(2)

Limitation

The Board may provide written consent for an acquisition described in paragraph (1)(A) or in paragraph (1)(B) only if the Board determines, based on clear and convincing evidence, that consummation of the proposed acquisition is necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability, and the Corporation has not received any qualified bid (as defined in section 18(c)(13)(C) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act) from another institution that is not subject to the prohibition in subsection (b).

.

3.

Congressional notification and justification for waivers

(a)

In general

Whenever the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, the Comptroller of the Currency, or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation waives a concentration limit under section 18(c)(13)(B) or section 44(e) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act or under section 3(d)(5), section 4(i)(8)(B), or section 14(c)(2) of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, in connection with the acquisition of a bank or insured depository institution in default or in danger of default, or in connection with an acquisition with respect to which the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation provides assistance under section 13 of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, the waiving agency and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, jointly, shall, not later than 30 days after such waiver, submit a written report to the Committee on Financial Services of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs in the Senate containing—

(1)

a justification for the waiver, including an analysis of why it was necessary to prevent significant economic disruption or significant adverse effects on financial stability;

(2)

a description of alternative bids or outcomes considered, including efforts to solicit and encourage bids from entities that would not require a waiver;

(3)

an explanation of why alternative bids were not selected, if applicable; and

(4)

any recommendations for legislative or regulatory changes to improve competition in future insured depository institution resolutions.

(b)

Public disclosure

The waiving agency submitting a report under subsection (a) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation shall make the report publicly available on their respective websites, subject to redactions for confidential supervisory information and any other information described under section 552(b) of title 5, United States Code.

4.

Limitation on considering bad faith bids in least cost determination

Section 13(c)(4) of the Federal Deposit Insurance Act (12 U.S.C. 1823(c)(4)) is amended by adding at the end the following:

(I)

Limitation on considering bad faith bids

In making a determination under this paragraph of whether an exercise of authority is the least costly to the Deposit Insurance Fund, any application, proposed application, or bid that would result in violation of—

(i)

section 18(c)(13) or 44(b)(2), or

(ii)

section 3(d)(2), 4(i)(8), or 14 of the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956,

shall not be considered a possible method for meeting the Corporation’s obligation under this section for purposes of subparagraph (A).

.

5.

Discretionary Surplus Fund

(a)

In general

The dollar amount specified under section 7(a)(3)(A) of the Federal Reserve Act (12 U.S.C. 289(a)(3)(A)) is reduced by $2,000,000.


(b)

Effective date

The amendment made by subsection (a) shall take effect on September 1, 2036.

Passed the House of Representatives July 14, 2026.

Kevin F. McCumber,

Clerk.