Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong opposition to the child deportation act. This cruel, inhumane, and unworkable bill was written in an extreme MAGA Republican echo chamber.…
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I rise today in strong opposition to the child deportation act. This cruel, inhumane, and unworkable bill was written in an extreme MAGA Republican echo chamber.
Considering H.R. 2 today under a closed rule is a cynical move on the part of Republicans to exploit the operational challenges associated with the lifting of title 42 public health restrictions.
Republicans have a short memory. Just in February, they voted to lift title 42 when they voted to lift the COVID-19 health emergency. It sets Customs and Border Protection up for failure by shifting all processing to ports of entry without providing any additional resources.
To make matters worse, it would bar CBP from leveraging technology to process migrants in an orderly way. H.R. 2 doesn't fund a single new officer at our ports of entry, where more than 90 percent of fentanyl is interdicted.
In committee, we tried to get an additional 1,700 officers to build greater capacity, but Republicans refused to do it.
Furthermore, this xenophobic bill would strip DHS funding from any community or religious organization that helps migrants. The language is so broad that an organization that places water in a remote area of the desert or provides a pregnant mother with a safe place to sleep would be ineligible for DHS funding. It is so broad that they may be refused homeland security grants to help protect their facilities.
Denying assistance to nonprofits is just plain shameful, particularly after what we saw in Brownsville this past weekend. There is reporting that a man who rammed his SUV into a crowd outside a migrant shelter, killing 8 and injuring at least 10 others, was fueled by invasion and alien rhetoric. My heart goes out to everyone hurt by this senseless act of violence.
The language in this bill is so far-reaching that it would force the American Red Cross to verify every person's immigration status before providing lifesaving services. Can you imagine if they had to say, ``Show your papers,'' before evacuating people? That is just inhumane.
Get this: H.R. 2 is so broadly written that it would actually impede detention and deportation.
Mr. Speaker, FOX News viewers who support deporting migrants should take a look at section 115(c) in division A. If enacted, it would prohibit DHS from contracting with any nongovernmental organization to transport or shelter ``inadmissible aliens.''
This language would prevent ICE from contracting with private companies to facilitate deportation or provide detention space because these companies are nongovernmental organizations. Yes, you heard that right. This bill is so poorly written that it could actually prevent ICE from deporting people.
Over the next 2 hours, Democrats will discuss many other problematic provisions of this extreme MAGA bill that Republicans cobbled together and that we learned yesterday would blow a $6.1 billion hole in the budget.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote ``no'' on this child deportation act, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, the extreme MAGA Republican default on America act, which the last speaker voted for, would result in an across-the-board cut of 22 percent for the Department of Homeland Security, which would undermine border security.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Texas (Ms. Jackson Lee).
Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentlewoman from Texas.
Mr. Speaker, Republicans want it both ways. First, they vote to reduce the number of Border Patrol agents in the field by 1,400 under their default in America act, and now all of a sudden, they want to do something different. So either you are for it or you are against it, but you can't have it both ways.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Payne).
Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from New Jersey.
Mr. Speaker, the Congressional Budget Office says the child deportation act would ``decrease the population of the United States by about 600,000 people, mostly by reducing the number of unaccompanied children present in the country.''
Republicans claim to be concerned about exploitation and abuse of unaccompanied children, but their answer is
to slam the door shut and deport them from the United States.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Goldman).
Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentleman from New York.
Mr. Speaker, on March 15, Border Patrol Chief Ortiz told the Homeland Security Committee that ``cartels control an awful lot of the southern border south of the United States.''
Last time I checked, south of the United States meant Mexico and not five of the nine U.S. Border Patrol sectors.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Menendez).
Mr. Speaker, at some point you have to correct the Record. We had a debt ceiling budget vote several weeks ago. The Republican-approved debt ceiling budget would cut the DHS budget by 22 percent.
So you can't be for something, but you don't invest in what you say you are for.
I will step back a little further and say that if Republicans are really serious about border security, then they would have joined Democrats in passing last year's government funding bill. It provided more than $17 billion to Customs and Border Protection alone and a 17 percent increase in the Border Patrol budget, but unfortunately, Speaker McCarthy voted against that, too.
Democrats have been to the border. In April of this year, I took nine Members to the border. We talked to a lot of people. I have been on the committee quite a while. I have gone to the border a number of times to see, so one visit I didn't go to is not the end of the world. I was on the border before the Speaker was in Congress, so there is history here that we just need to make sure that we all understand.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Correa).
Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentleman from California.
Mr. Speaker, the extreme MAGA Republican default on America act, which the last Speaker voted for, would result in CBP not being able to seize nearly 900 pounds of fentanyl because of the draconian cuts to its budget.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from California (Mr. Robert Garcia).
Mr. Speaker, on February 1, the last speaker voted against the public health emergency that served as the legal basis for the use of title 42 at the southwest border.
My colleagues want to have it both ways, which is why, I guess, he supports H.R. 2, the child deportation act.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arizona (Mr. Grijalva), the ranking member of the Natural Resources Committee.
Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 1 minute to the gentleman from Arizona.
Mr. Speaker, if Republicans were serious about border security, they would have joined Democrats in passing last year's government funding bill, which paid for an increase of 300 Border Patrol agents, the first increase since the Obama administration.
Not only did the last speaker not support it, she voted to have 1,400 Border Patrol agents fewer in the field under the extreme MAGA Republican default on America act.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Michigan (Mr. Thanedar).
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2 squeezes Customs and Border Patrol officers working at ports of entry by failing to provide resources to cover the increased workload that will result from the bill.
If Republicans were serious about border security, they would have joined Democrats in passing last year's government funding bill, which appropriated $60 million to hire an additional 125 CBP officers.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from New York (Ms. Clarke).
Mr. Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentlewoman from New York.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2 does nothing to combat illicit narcotics like fentanyl. If Republicans were serious about border security, they would have joined Democrats in passing last year's government funding bill, which provided $70 million for intrusive inspection technology at ports of entry where most dangerous drugs are interdicted.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentlewoman from Oregon (Ms. Salinas).
Mr. Speaker, while the imposition of a nationwide E-Verify on all businesses found in this bill is not part of the Homeland Security division, it still affects me as a Member of Congress from a rural part of the country.
I cannot overstate how damaging this language is to the agriculture labor in my district. Many of my rural Republican colleagues know this, too. To put it bluntly, if enacted, this bill will force American farmers to go out of business.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record letters of opposition against the child deportation act from the AFL-CIO; SEIU, Service Employees International Union; and the Agriculture Workforce Coalition.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Illinois (Mr. Sorensen).
Mr. Speaker, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the child deportation act provision requiring DHS to negotiate with El Salvador, Guatemala, and Honduras to return unaccompanied children will result in 550,000 children being deported back to the violence they fled from over a 10-year period.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2 is an anti-immigrant and un-Christian bill, just as legislation previously introduced by Representative Roy was. That is why nearly 150 community and religious groups oppose it.
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record letters in opposition from 136 community and religious groups, including Bethany Christian Services, Catholic Charities, and Union for Reform Judaism, Sojourners, U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, and the Jesuit Conference.
May 8, 2023.
House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Vote Recommendation Opposing H.R. 2 Secure the Border Act of 2023
Dear Representative: The undersigned state, local, and
national immigration, civil rights, public health, education,
religious, labor, climate justice, and other organizations
write to respectfully request that you VOTE NO on H.R. 2, the
Secure the Border Act of 2023, set to receive a vote on the
House floor on May 11. The bill would dismantle the asylum
system and cause immeasurable harm to immigrant communities.
The newly elected majority is driving an intentionally
divisive agenda to amplify anti-immigrant animus without
moral and effective policy solutions. We ask you to oppose
this anti-immigrant bill that would:
1. Deport Unaccompanied Children. The bill would end Health
& Human Services funding for legal representation of
unaccompanied children in immigration proceedings, depriving
children of the attorneys their safety depends upon. It would
also provide only a cursory screening process for children at
the border, risking children's summary return to human
trafficking and other dangers. The bill subjects all
unaccompanied children to an accelerated removal process
worse than what currently exists, and allows for detention of
unaccompanied children in jail-like border facilities for up
to 30 days--ten times longer than permitted under current
law.
2. End Asylum. The bill would effectively shut down our
current asylum system by adding dozens of new restrictions on
asylum, including eliminating the right to seek asylum for
those who cross the border between ports of entry and barring
asylum for those who transit through a third country. It
would make it nearly impossible for migrants to seek asylum
in the U.S. and significantly easier to deport asylum
seekers, including families and children, into harm's way.
This will only sow chaos at the border, rather than
ameliorating it.
3. Restart `Remain in Mexico'. The bill would restart the
failed and dangerous Remain in Mexico program for all
migrants, including unaccompanied children who were
previously exempted under the Trump administration. Seeking
to unilaterally return asylum seekers to other countries
without consulting the receiving country nor the migrant
results in refoulement of the migrant to danger and
problematic foreign policy implications.
4. Jail Immigrant Families. The bill would require family
detention for any families attempting to enter the U.S. to
seek asylum, as well as any families who previously entered
the U.S. without visas. Like all immigration detention,
family detention centers have a well-documented history of
abusive conditions, including inadequate medical care and
mental health deterioration for asylum seekers, survivors of
trauma, and children.
5. Mandate E-Verify. The bill would require E-Verify for
all employers in the U.S., severely damaging our economy,
harming American workers, and resulting in billions of
dollars in lost government revenue. National implementation
of E-Verify raises concerns about efficiency, due process,
and racial profiling and decreased employment among Latinos.
6. Gut Programs that Work: The bill would strip funding for
the Alternative To Detention Case Management Pilot Program,
Office of Immigration Detention Ombudsman, and the vital
Shelter and Services Program, which has helped communities
around the country receive reimbursement for costs related to
humanitarian responses to migration. These programs have been
effective at providing services crucial to preventing more
deaths under CBP custody and immigrant detention and have
reduced impacts on receiving communities.
7. Burden our Local Communities by Making it Impossible for
Employers to Hire Asylum Seekers with Work Authorization.
This bill eliminates work authorization for asylum seekers
who cross between ports of entry and requires six month
renewal periods for asylum-based employment authorization.
Combined with USCIS processing time, this would effectively
make it impossible for businesses, even in the face oflabor
shortages, to employ asylum seekers. These provisions will
exponentially increase the backlogs at users and make it even
more difficult for USCIS to timely process applications. This
runs counter to bipartisan efforts to improve the employment
authorization process for asylum seekers and will create an
unnecessary burden on local communities.
8. Undermine Essential Partnerships with Humanitarian
Organizations. The bill would bar any and all DHS funding for
NGOs, including faith-based NGOs, that provide shelter,
transportation, food or legal assistance to vulnerable
immigrants, including those who arrive on a visa and later
become ``inadmissible.'' Congress should be investing more in
non-profit organizations providing respite care, legal
service providers, trauma-informed care and community-based
service providers, not subjecting them to the punitive
measures in this legislation. This measure would impact NGOs
across the country that receive DHS funding, including
organizations working with FEMA during an emergency-it's
``show me your papers'' for the Red Cross.
9. Resume Building Trump's Border Wall. The bill would
restart the construction of the border wall, a harmful waste
of taxpayer resources. It would allow DHS to exempt all
border infrastructure construction, development, operation,
and maintenance from any law except the Constitution, thereby
reducing the rule of law at our borders. The bill would also
restrict the ability for landowners, local communities and
tribes to assert legal challenges opposing the construction
of the wall, and thus pave the way for irreparable and
unchecked harms to the borderlands. We have already seen the
negative consequences from the Trump Administration era
resulting in: bulldozed Native American burial sites;
dynamited pristine mountain wilderness; segments of the wall
being constructed in flood plains; and the unjust seizing of
private ranches and farmlands.
10. Eliminate Parole Authority. The bill would decimate the
parole power that presidents historically have used to parole
individuals in response to humanitarian emergencies or in
furtherance of foreign policy objectives. It also precludes
the President's recent parole programs for Ukrainians,
Afghans, Cubans, Haitians, Nicaragruans, and Venezuelans, and
cuts work authorization for parolees.
11. Jail Any Person who Overstays a Visa. The bill would
jail and penalize immigrants who have violated any condition
of their visa or overstayed by 10 days or more, even for
violations that occur due to circumstances beyond the
individuals' control such as a medical emergency. This
provision would even make it a crime for anyone on a visa to
apply for asylum, given they would not have
left once their visa expired. Congress should focus on
solutions that regularize the status of long-term residents
and fix our broken immigration system.
12. Balloon Border Agents. The bill would require Border
Patrol to hire enough agents to reach 22,000 on board
(currently there are roughly 19,500) and restrict Border
Patrol agents from performing ``duties of processing
coordinators.'' Processing coordinators currently perform
duties such as transporting and processing migrants and
carrying out mandatory welfare checks. With only around 1,000
processing coordinators currently in the field, this
restriction would seriously hinder Border Patrol's efforts to
fairly and efficiently process asylum seekers and carry out
their law enforcement mission. CBP is overfunded with funding
streams that push resources towards enforcement and wasteful
surveillance, while humanitarian needs go underfunded.
We urge you to vote in ways that protect immigrants and
VOTE NO against H.R. 2, the Secure the Border Act of 2023 in
the upcoming floor vote. We must oppose racist, xenophobic,
unconstructive proposals that add fuel to hate and present no
constructive and moral solutions. Thank you for your time and
attention.
Sincerely,
National Organizations:
#WelcomeWithDignity Campaign, African Communities Together,
Alianza Americas, America's Voice, American Civil Liberties
Union, American Federation of Teachers, American Immigration
Council, American Immigration Lawyers Association, American
Psychological Association, American-Arab Anti-Discrimination
Committee (ADC), Asian Americans Advancing Justice
AAJC, Asian Pacific Institute on Gender-Based Violence,
Mr. Speaker, the Congressional Budget Office estimates that the bill would ``affect the legal status of about 4.4 million people who would be granted parole or asylum under current law.''
Parolees fleeing war in Ukraine and the Taliban in Afghanistan, as well as those from Haiti and other failed countries in this hemisphere would be required to leave the United States, and CBO anticipates that ``half would reside unlawfully in the United States.''
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, Republicans claim that the Biden administration's policies have led to open borders, but nothing could be further from the truth.
President Biden has, with little help from Congress, worked to dissuade migrants from taking the dangerous journey northward. The Biden administration is surging resources to the border. Even as it ramps down title 42 removals, it is using title 8 authorities to promptly remove and bar reentry from certain crossers.
At the same time, the Biden administration is working to make the asylum process more orderly through the CBP One app.
It has also stood up a parole process for certain Venezuelan, Nicaraguan, Cuban, and Haitian migrants that in March were credited with a drop of 72 percent in the 7-day average from a high of 1,231 in January.
H.R. 2 would take those tools away from DHS.
Mr. Speaker, in the unlikely event that this cruel, extreme, and unworkable bill makes it to the President's desk, he has promised to veto it.
To quote the Statement of Administration Policy: ``H.R. 2 does nothing to address the root causes of migration, reduces humanitarian protections, and restricts unlawful pathways, which are critical alternatives to unlawful entry.'' It goes on to say: ``This bill would make things worse, not better.''
Mr. Speaker, I include in the Record the administration's statement.
Statement of Administration Policy
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time for closing.
Mr. Speaker, it is remarkable that Republicans are getting behind the child deportation act, a bill that would blow a $6.1 billion hole in our Federal budget at the same time that they are feigning concern about the Federal deficit.
Today, the other side has said a lot about how the Biden administration is
handling the ending of title 42, but remarkably, not one of them acknowledged that they voted to lift it in February.
Enactment of H.R. 2 would do nothing to keep fentanyl out of our communities or protect unaccompanied children.
Just for the record, in our section of the bill, fentanyl is not even mentioned. I would hope at some point the other two discussions tomorrow might talk a little more directly about fentanyl if it is in there. It is not in our section at this point.
For the record, the information that we have about 90 percent of the fentanyl coming into the country comes from the Chief of the Border Patrol. It is his information. We can only take him at his word.
Those five ports of entry that the chair talked about, that was not what he said. He said it was in Mexico, not in the U.S., in terms of being controlled by the cartels. I think we all will admit the cartels do not control the border within the boundaries of the United States. It is a play on words, but at least we can be accurate with that.
In terms of how we determine who comes, who is captured, and how the fentanyl is collected, I suggest that you talk to the FBI, Homeland Security Investigations, or DEA. They are the persons who interview the people who are caught at our ports of entry.
More importantly, most of the people who we catch at our ports of entry are American citizens. They are not, for the most part, immigrants or aliens, or whatever you want to call them, trying to come into this country illegally. They are American citizens.
In terms of guns, the cartels are a violent operation. There is no question about it. We need to do everything that we can to stop them. We can't keep American guns from going to Mexico unless we come up with an enhanced policy to do that.
We have to acknowledge that the majority of the guns that the cartels are using are coming from the United States. As the record will reflect, there is only one gun store in the entire country of Mexico. It takes months for an individual to even get cleared to buy a gun. We just want the record to reflect the truth.
Enactment of H.R. 2, as I said, would do nothing to keep fentanyl out of our communities or protect unaccompanied children. What it will do is penalize communities and religious organizations that care for vulnerable people.
Section 115(b) is so broad that a nonprofit hospital that admits an undocumented migrant would be deemed as facilitating unlawful activities. Cartels and smugglers are champing at the bit to see this bill enacted into law.
H.R. 2 would create conditions where desperate people will be left with few options but to try to enter the U.S. illegally between ports of entry. It would be a boon for smugglers' illicit business.
We should be coming together to enact sensible border and immigration policies that support our communities and economy. We can do better than the child deportation act.
Mr. Speaker, I urge a ``no'' vote on this extreme MAGA bill, and I yield back the balance of my time.