I thank the gentleman from California for the time, and I also thank him for yielding. Mr. Speaker, at the outset, I would like to commend Chairman Shuster and Ranking Member Rahall for their hard work on the legislation before the House…
I thank the gentleman from California for the time, and I also thank him for yielding.
Mr. Speaker, at the outset, I would like to commend Chairman Shuster and Ranking Member Rahall for their hard work on the legislation before the House today.
H.R. 4005, the Howard Coble Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act of 2014, authorizes the United States Coast Guard, a critical component of the Department of Homeland Security, for 2 years.
Every day, the men and women of the Coast Guard work to protect our ports and waterways from terrorist attack and other dangers.
It is for that very reason that the Committee on Homeland Security should have considered this legislation. Unfortunately, Chairman McCaul rejected my request that, consistent with precedent the committee established in prior Congresses, he insist on a referral of this measure.
Doing so would have ensured that the members of the Committee on Homeland Security could inform the bill's security-related provisions in an open markup setting.
As a result of Chairman McCaul's decision to waive the right of the committee to consider this measure, the House has before it a bill that does not fully take into account the statutory mission of the Department of Homeland Security component it authorizes.
In fact, it does not have a single provision solely dedicated to port and maritime security. You just heard the gentlelady from California talk about port security and how important it is, and I appreciate the gentleman from California saying that he would work with her, but it is also a responsibility of the Committee on Homeland Security.
While disappointing, I do not blame the leadership of the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure for the absence of such provisions. It is the responsibility of the Committee on Homeland Security to leave its mark on this important homeland security legislation.
To be clear, this is not a case of the Committee on Homeland Security lacking
the jurisdiction needed to inform the legislation before us today. It is a case of a chairman failing to ensure his committee was afforded the right to exercise its jurisdictional authority.
House of Representatives,
Committee on Homeland Security,
Washington, DC, February 11, 2014.
Hon. Michael T. McCaul,
Chairman, Committee on Homeland Security, Ford House Office
Building, House of Representatives, Washington, DC.
Hon. Candice S. Miller,
Chairman, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime Security,
Cannon House Office Building, House of Representatives,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman McCaul and Subcommittee Chairman Miller: We
write to urge you to insist upon a sequential referral of
H.R. 4005, the ``Coast Guard and Maritime Transportation Act
of 2014,'' and to afford the Members of the Committee on
Homeland Security (the Committee) the opportunity to consider
this important homeland security legislation in an open
markup session.
Despite H.R. 4005 containing numerous provisions within the
Committee's Rule X, clause 1(j) jurisdiction, the Speaker
chose not to refer the bill to the Committee upon
introduction, opting to refer the bill to the Committee on
Transportation and Infrastructure (T&I) alone. As you are
aware, H.R. 4005, as ordered to be reported by T&I today,
contains numerous provisions within the legislative
jurisdiction of the Committee.
Since being established as a standing committee in the
109th Congress, the Committee has waived its right to a
sequential referral of legislation authorizing the United
States Coast Guard (USCG) on only two occasions. The first
instance was in the 109th Congress and the most recent was
during the 112th Congress. In contrast, in the 110th and
111th Congresses, we made certain that bills authorizing the
USCG, a critical component of the Department of Homeland
Security (DHS), were referred to the Committee.
As recently as last week, the Committee's Subcommittee on
Border and Maritime Security held a public hearing to explore
the USCG's homeland security mission. During that hearing,
Chairman Miller emphasized the important homeland security
mission of the USCG when she stated:
``Since 9/11, the Coast Guard has taken an ever-increasing
role in the protection of our nation. We've given the Coast
Guard additional responsibility. We have tasked them to
specifically focus their limited resources on port and
maritime security.''
We concur with Chairman Miller's sentiment regarding the
critical role the USCG plays in ensuring the security of our
ports and maritime system. To ensure H.R. 4005 reflects the
USCG's homeland security mission, we urge you to insist on a
referral and hold an open markup session of the bill.
In addition to our desire to see the Members of our
Committee have an opportunity to shape the policy in a bill
authorizing a critical component of DHS, we believe it is
critical that the Committee exercise its jurisdictional
prerogative whenever possible. H.R. 4005 represents an
opportunity for you to ensure that the Committee exercises
its existing jurisdictional authority to the fullest extent
possible.
Thank you, in advance, for your attention to this request.
Should you or your staff have any questions on this matter,
please contact Ms. Rosaline Cohen, Chief Counsel for
Legislation of the Committee on Homeland Security, at x6-
2616.
Sincerely,
Bennie G. Thompson,
Ranking Member.
Sheila Jackson Lee,
Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Border and Maritime
Security.