Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the Senate bill (S. 2832) to reauthorize and improve the program authorized by the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965. Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume. Mr.…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the Senate bill (S. 2832) to reauthorize and improve the program authorized by the Appalachian Regional Development Act of 1965.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, S. 2832 reauthorizes and improves the Appalachian Regional Commission, the ARC. I want to point out very early on that there are no earmarks in this legislation.
The ARC has been a successful program for the past 40 years and has helped reduce the Appalachian region's poverty level, cut the infant mortality rate, increased the percentage of adults with a high school diploma, provided water and sewer services to a significant number of households and businesses, and created new jobs.
S. 2832 is a simple 5-year reauthorization, increasing authorization levels to adjust for inflation. The reauthorization also makes a minor change to the economic status designations of ARC counties. Currently ARC has four statutory designations which are determined by the unemployment rate, per capita income and poverty rate of each ARC county.
The bill creates an additional designation to assist counties that are at
risk, yet don't fully qualify as distressed. Currently these counties may only be funded up to 50 percent of project costs. At-risk counties have fragile economies and have significant difficulty meeting the current 50 percent match rate to participate in the program.
In many cases, at-risk counties were recently distressed and eligible for an 80 percent Federal match. The addition of the ``at risk'' designation will further assist counties as they transition from distressed to the transitional designation and fund projects in these counties up to 70 percent of the project costs.
The ARC is viewed by most as a successful model for economic development, and the ARC has done a great job encouraging local economic development by making use of local resources for the benefit of the community.
It was recently estimated that each dollar of ARC funding leveraged $2.57 in other public funding and $8.46 in related private funding. The ability to leverage a large amount of other public and private funding makes ARC a very valuable tool for our communities.
The Appalachian Regional Commission is a vital tool for economic development in Appalachia, and the program will end in 10 days unless we pass S. 2832 today. I want to repeat, the program will end in 10 days unless we pass S. 2832 today. We must ensure continuation of the successful program and further express our support of the hard-working people in the Appalachian region.
I want to remind my fellow colleagues that there are no earmarks in this reauthorization.
I encourage my colleagues to join me in support of S. 2832.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, I would just like to remind the gentleman, my good friend from Tennessee, that if we oppose this legislation, in 10 days this important legislation and important Commission will expire, so it is imperative that we pass this piece of legislation.
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as she may consume to the gentlewoman from West Virginia (Mrs. Capito), who has been a great leader on moving forward this reauthorization bill.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
The gentleman from Minnesota, I appreciate the fact that he loves ARC, but more importantly to me, the gentleman's passion for ARC is most impressive, especially noting that he does not hail from the Appalachian region, which I do, and the people of the Appalachian region that I hail from. Small towns like Hymen, Pennsylvania, and Salisbury, and counties like Fayette and Huntington County, they have seen the good works of the Appalachian Regional Commission, and we do not want to lose that.
I am not so bold to try to explain to the gentleman the legislative process. He knows far better than most in this Chamber that we have been able to, in the Senate bill, get some significant provisions in there that we wanted authorizing as an at-risk category, which is extremely important to counties all throughout the Appalachian region, increasing the authorization funding amounts in this bill.
So the gentleman knows those provisions are in there, and as I said earlier, if we do not act in 10 days, this will sunset. This will terminate. It will end and we may lose it forever, which I am not willing to take that risk. I do not believe that the Senate is going to pass that appropriations bill in 10 days, and as I said, as I read the legislation, it will sunset. It will terminate.
I would encourage Members to look at that fact, and I am willing to work with the gentleman to move forward, because I do understand your concerns about earmarking. And I want to remind Members of this Chamber, there are no earmarks in this reauthorization. This bill is going to move forward and make sure that the ARC survives for another 5 years and can continue to do the great work that it has done in the 13 States in that region.
Mr. Speaker, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Once again, I understand the gentleman's concern, and I would suggest that we take care of this earmarking problem in the appropriations process. I know that the Senate bill has language in their appropriations bills that deal with this, and I think that is the appropriate place to do it.
Again, I have great concern if we do not reauthorize this and get it to the President's desk that we, in fact, could sunset and terminate this program. That is something that I am not willing to take the risk on.
Once again, I appreciate the gentleman's support for ARC, his passion for ARC. I want to remind my colleagues that there are no earmarks in this reauthorization bill and that I would encourage my colleagues to vote to continue ARC, the Appalachian Regional Commission's positive impact that it has had, extremely positive impact it has had on our region of the country that needs it.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.