I thank the gentleman for yielding. Mr. Chairman, in March, the Education and Labor Committee overwhelming passed by a vote of 42-1 H.R. 1429, which was my privilege to introduce with both Democrats and Republicans as cosponsors. I hope at…
I thank the gentleman for yielding.
Mr. Chairman, in March, the Education and Labor Committee overwhelming passed by a vote of 42-1 H.R. 1429, which was my privilege to introduce with both Democrats and Republicans as cosponsors. I hope at the close of today's debate the full House will do similarly.
Head Start has served our most vulnerable children and families well for 42 years; and more recently, early Head Start has done the same for infants and toddlers.
Head Start works, and this bill will make it work even better. This bill increases Head Start's authorization by $461 million to benefit as many as 10,000 more children, and increases funding for Indian and migrant and seasonal Head Start programs. It sets aside 60 percent of new funds for activities such as teacher salaries, professional development and extended program hours. It suspends the flawed national reporting system. It improves teacher qualifications. It increases access to Early Head Start. It improves training and technical assistance to help programs identify their strengths and weaknesses. And it strengthens the quality of Head Start boards and maintains strong parental involvement through shared governance of Head Start programs.
I would note that we are expecting a motion to recommit that would allow faith-based programs to discriminate in hiring based on religion using Federal funds. Before supporting this bill by 42-1, the committee considered and rejected such a policy. Faith-based programs can and do participate in Head Start and have done so for many years, and I support that strongly. However, this motion is wrong, and I encourage my colleagues to oppose it.
In closing, I want to thank Chairman Miller for his outstanding work through the years on this program and for his specific work this year. This is a very good bill. I want to thank Ranking Members McKeon and Castle, it was really a pleasure to work with them, and all the members of the committee for their hard work on this bill.
I would like to thank the staff, especially Ruth Friedman, Chairman Miller's senior policy adviser; Susan Ross and James Bergeron with Ranking Member McKeon; and Jessica Gross with Ranking Member Castle; and Lloyd Horwich of my staff.
Mr. Chairman, I look forward to passage of this bill today and to working through the conference committee to see that this bill becomes law.
Mr. Chairman, I would just say in reading the amendment that States should generally follow the standards. I served in a State legislature for 12 years in appropriations, and I know what license that word ``generally'' gives to a State legislature in a State government. Generally it does not keep these really good high standards that we have worked on for 42 years on in this bill.
Mr. Chairman, I thank the gentleman for yielding.
It has been suggested that we put this in the Higher Education bill, but the Higher Education bill has been kind of stalled. And I always believe you put your cargo on the train that is moving, and this train is moving.
The Senate reported its version out of committee. I think we have a much better chance to get this done if we put it on this bill. This train is moving.
Mr. Chairman, I don't question the motives of Mr. Mica, but his amendment would jeopardize program quality by speeding up the deadline for the 50 percent of the Head Start teachers having their bachelor's degrees.
Budgets have really forced Head Start centers to make very difficult, sometime impossible decisions to reduce services or to serve fewer children. And I fear that the Mica amendment would exacerbate the hard choices which Head Start programs have faced over recent years because this Congress has not appropriated the kind of money we need.
The bill that came out of committee, by 42-1, establishes, I think, a rather reasonable and ambitious time line for 50 percent of our Head Start teachers to attain their bachelor's degrees. Under this time line, the bill ensures that Congress can provide the necessary funding to achieve this goal. We have to, as I think we have done in this bill which came out of committee, we have to balance the improvements in the program with the real resources. If we had unlimited resources, we could do all these things. But I think the bill balances the improvements with the resources.
Mr. Chairman, I rise to oppose the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, the Putnam amendment would jeopardize the seamless services that many high-quality Head Start programs with very deep roots in their communities provide to disadvantaged children. Because the quality of our Head Start programs is critical to ensuring that disadvantaged children receive the benefits of Head Start, this bill, which passed out with only one dissenting vote from committee, implements a new process to recompete underperforming programs. The amendment by Mr. Putnam guts the bill's provision to ensure that high- quality Head Start programs do not have to recompete for their grants.
They are reviewed by a panel of experts we put in place to look at them. They are reviewed and have to satisfy that review, but they do not then have to recompete.
The Putnam amendment also eliminates the bill's provisions to ensure a fair and equitable process for recompeting underperforming Head Start programs. And we worked hard to get a fair and equitable process for that.
By striking those provisions, which he does in his amendment, the Department of Health and Human Services is authorized to create its own system for recompetition.
We worked hard with the Head Start community to try to ensure that we would have a panel of experts that would assure that the unperforming programs were really improved or put out of the system but not have the high performing have to go through the recompetition process every 5 years, but be reviewed by the panel of experts.
Mr. Chairman, I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I rise to speak in support of the amendment.
Mr. Chairman, we support the amendment.
Many of these are included in the regulations, but you would put it in the statute now and expand them, and I think you have done a very good job in your expansion of that.
I commend you for your work on this. I commend you for your concern for children. It is very important. We certainly want to protect our children, and I think this is a very good amendment and we support it.
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.