Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk. Mr. Chairman, I first want to thank the chairman and the ranking member for the hard work that they have done on this piece of legislation. My amendment is a simple one. As we all recognize,…
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
Mr. Chairman, I first want to thank the chairman and the ranking member for the hard work that they have done on this piece of legislation.
My amendment is a simple one. As we all recognize, the Army Corps of Engineers provides invaluable assistance to financially strapped communities through its general construction fund, specifically for wastewater and water improvements and, in past years, has allocated specifically funds for this purpose. However, this year's report does not include any money for this account.
So the amendment I offer would direct that $44 million, which is 3 percent of the total allocation for construction projects in the Army Corps of Engineers, be set aside to support environmental infrastructure programs specifically for financially distressed communities around the country.
As we know, Mr. Chairman, there are approximately $298 billion of unmet needs for wastewater and stormwater treatment that are projected over the next 20 years. Of that, about 15 to 20 percent represents water treatment, and that percentage is expected to grow over time because of increases in Federal regulations.
In older cities, a single system, in fact, combines both stormwater and sewage; and rain, obviously, and snow can overwhelm those systems and present tremendous challenges.
Seventy-two percent of the United States population is served by sewage treatment plants, and 3.8 million Americans are served by facilities providing less than secondary treatment, which is the basic requirement of law.
This is a huge unmet need, and for municipalities--particularly financially distressed municipalities--investing in water treatment facilities can be a tremendous burden that they can't meet alone.
In fact, since 2007, the Federal Government has required cities to invest more than $15 billion in new pipes, plants, and equipment to address sewer and wastewater treatment.
So we are imposing--and rightly so, I am not criticizing that--but we are imposing these standards, and the costs of those are being borne by municipalities.
What this amendment attempts to do is to ensure that at least some portion of that account is set aside for wastewater treatment projects and particularly targets facilities that have financial challenges-- financially distressed communities.
I have spoken with the ranking member, and I recognize the chairman has reserved a point of order. I would ask if my ranking member would continue to make the case that these wastewater treatment facilities require some additional investment, and if that is the case, I look forward to working with the chairman and my ranking member, so that we can be sure that this investment is preserved, as it has been in past years, so that communities that really need assistance with their wastewater treatment facilities will have some access to these resources, and if so, I am prepared to withdraw my amendment.
I yield to the gentlewoman from Ohio.
Mr. Chair, I ask unanimous consent to withdraw my amendment.