Border Security, Economic Opportunity, And Immigration Modernization Act
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the pending amendment be set aside so I can call up amendment No. 1227. I ask unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with. Madam President, the debate we are having in…
Madam President, I ask unanimous consent that the pending amendment be set aside so I can call up amendment No. 1227.
I ask unanimous consent that the reading of the amendment be dispensed with.
Madam President, the debate we are having in this Chamber is incredibly important to our Nation's
future. We simply cannot afford to waste this opportunity to bring meaningful reform to America's immigration system. We have a chance to enact commonsense reforms that will help fix the broken system that punishes those who simply want to work hard and play by the rules.
Over the course of the next 2 weeks, we have an opportunity to enhance border security and to ensure that those coming to our shores do so in a lawful manner. In order to do that, we need to make sure the underlying immigration bill actually addresses the issues and offers reasonable solutions that make sense.
Let me be clear: In order to fix the immigration system, we must secure our borders. Attempting to bring about immigration reform while ignoring the problems at our borders makes no sense. I, like many of my colleagues, have repeatedly voted this week in favor of increasing border security. I think most Americans would agree any reform legislation must include measures that stop unlawful entry into our country. The underlying bill recognizes the serious need for greater security at our borders and establishes a southern border security commission if State-based results are not achieved in a reasonable time.
I for one hope we secure our borders effectively and quickly so no such commission is ever needed. The southern border security commission will be established only if the Department of Homeland Security fails to achieve effective control of the southern border within 5 years of the bill's enactment. Hopefully we never recognize that scenario. But if for some reason a southern border security commission is needed, and if we fail to change the status quo after 5 years, then the States that are most affected by these issues must have a central role in fixing those problems.
Let me be clear: My amendment No. 1227 does not endorse the creation of the border commission. It simply ensures that should the commission be required, it will be fully representative of States' concerns and State-based recommendations on how to achieve control of the southern border.
The commission is primarily comprised of representatives from southern border States, including Arizona, California, Texas, and New Mexico, and is responsible for providing concrete recommendations to Congress and the administration on how to achieve control of the southern border should DHS fail to do so.
But Nevada would not be guaranteed a voice on the commission, despite the fact that Nevada shares contiguous borders with two southern border States and faces many of the same immigration-related challenges as these States. It is more than reasonable to argue that Nevada, which is a short drive away from San Diego, Los Angeles, and Phoenix, should be included on a commission designed to improve border security in the southwestern region. If that commission is necessary, Nevada should have a seat at that table. Including Nevada on the commission makes the underlying bill more effective, enhances this particular border security provision, and ensures that it fully addresses the issues affecting the southern border and southwestern States.
If we reject common sense during this amendment process, we are going to end up right back where we started in years to come. We are not going to give the American people the solution they deserve in this immigration bill. It is common sense that if the Federal Government fails to gain control of the borders, then the States most affected by the failure should be able to play a role in fixing the problem. It is common sense that States such as Nevada, which faces the same problems as other States in the region, should contribute to the process as members of that commission.
I urge my colleagues to support this amendment.
I yield the floor.
Mr. President, as I said in my remarks this morning, I hope this commission is never required because if it is, it means the border still is not secure 5 years down the road. If that is the case, then the commission will need to be fully representative of the concerns and recommendations of all the States in the southwestern region that are affected by our broken immigration system.
Should DHS fail to gain control of the borders, and should it be necessary to form a commission to ensure we achieve that objective, it makes no sense to exclude Nevada's perspective and recommendations. My State's unique location and growing immigrant population leave it highly vulnerable to our Nation's flawed immigration system.
I urge my colleagues to support this commonsense amendment.
Mr. President, I yield the floor.
I ask for the yeas and nays.