Madam Speaker, I am pleased to have this opportunity to congratulate the collegiate policy debate team of Brett Bricker and Nate Johnson from the University of Kansas on their National Debate Tournament championship this spring. Nearly 80…
Madam Speaker, I am pleased to have this opportunity to congratulate the collegiate policy debate team of Brett Bricker and Nate Johnson from the University of Kansas on their National Debate Tournament championship this spring.
Nearly 80 teams competed in this year's National Debate Tournament, held in Austin, TX. After 10 challenging rounds of debate, Bricker and Johnson defeated the defending national champions from Wake Forest to bring home the title. While less prominent than its athletic counterparts, collegiate policy debate is a competitive, academic activity that exists in universities across the Nation. Students spend countless hours throughout the academic year reading articles and forming arguments to debate a national topic on both sides. In addition to the grueling work required by the activity, students must also keep up with their schoolwork, all without the benefit of scholarships.
I am pleased to share with the other members of the House of Representatives a recent article in Kansas Alumni magazine chronicling the champions' story. I ask that my colleagues join me in congratulating Brett Bricker and Nate Johnson on their championship.
Raise the Blue Banner--There's no Room for Argument: KU's Debate Team
Is the Best in the Land
(By Joe Miller)
While other Kansas seniors are enjoying spring break on
beaches in Florida, Brett Bricker is in cold, damp Lawrence,
his nose buried in books. He reads all day, every day, taking
short breaks now and then to grab some food. And he keeps
reading while he eats. At night he can't sleep, so he gets up
and reads some more, plowing through thick, mind-numbing
books about the global economy and farm subsidies, and dense
articles culled from peer-reviewed journals.
lt's grueling, but this is March--tourney time. Bricker
knows he must give his all if he wants to bring the national
championship trophy back to KU.
When he needs a break from reading, he trudges across an
empty campus to Bailey Hall, downstairs to the basement, to
meet with his teammate, fellow senior Nate Johnson. It's a
messy place, with tables and study carrels stacked with books
and photocopied articles, reams and reams of them, and
accordion tile folders and pens and highlighters. And
trophies. Lots and lots of trophies.
``There's too many trophies,'' he says. ``Not enough room
for all of them.''
But Bricker, a math major, and Johnson, a double major in
philosophy and political science, have spent four years doing
all they can to add to the clutter. They first set foot in
this place when they were high school students and were blown
away by the winning tradition showcased on its walls, which
are covered with banners: yellow and red for Final Four
finishes, burgundy for ending the regular season ranked No.
1, and four KU blue ones for national championships: 1954,
1970, 1976 and 1983. ``When you get here, you want to work as
hard as you can to enshrine your name here,'' Johnson says.
Among the banners are several bearing their names, each for
perfectly admirable accomplishments such as earning top seed
in a championship tournament or finishing in the finals or
Final Four. But those aren't good enough for Bricker and
Johnson. The banners that bear their names aren't Jayhawk
blue.
Folks sometimes compare KU's debate program to its storied
basketball program. But that's really doing a disservice to
debate. Over the past 50 years, the Jayhawks won the National
Debate Tournament four times, made it to the NDT Final Four
on 13 occasions, and have qualified for the tourney every
year since 1968.
And, unlike basketball, they do it all without the benefit
of full-ride scholarships. The Jayhawk debate squad, a
perennial national top 10, is a team of walk-ons. ``Our
students debate because they love debate,'' says coach Scott
Harris.
Despite its success, Kansas doesn't attract the nation's
top high school debaters the way rivals do. Other top-ranked
debate programs, such as Northwestern, Emory, Harvard,
Dartmouth and California-Berkeley, reload every season with
champion debaters from the best prep schools in the country.
Kansas builds its success with in-state students who had
little opportunity to compete at the national level.
``Kansas has a great tradition of taking kids who weren't
especially good debaters in high school and making them into
champions,'' Bricker says.
He and Johnson are perfect examples. Both debated in high
school, Johnson in Manhattan and Bricker in Wichita. And
though both qualified for the national championship
tournament, along with hundreds of other kids, neither made
it to elimination rounds, much less the Final Four or
championship.
Yet now they're heading into the final tournament of their
college careers, the storied National Debate Tournament, as
the second-ranked team in the nation, having been edged out
of the top spot by Northwestern in February after a season-
long, neck-and-neck battle.
It would have been nice to finish No. 1, of course. But in
the big scheme of things, it doesn't matter. All that matters
now--indeed, maybe all that ever has mattered--is the NDT.
Last year, Kansas got knocked out in the Elite Eight. Same
thing the year before.
Now the Jayhawks have one last chance to win it for
themselves, and for their coach, who, despite an outstanding
record in his 18 years in Lawrence, has never won the big
one.
Harris came to Lawrence in 1991, after a five-year stint as
director of debate for the University of Louisville, where,
truth be told, he was beginning to feel disillusioned with
the game. It's a high burnout activity,'' he explains.
Observing Bricker and Johnson as they prepare for the NDT,
it's easy to see why. Each works more than 40 hours a week on
debate during the regular season, much more at championship
time. This is in addition to school. And neither of them
sloughs off their schoolwork. Both are graduating with honors
and have shored up plans to continue their studies, Johnson
in law school and Bricker as a master's student in KU's
communication studies program.
Coaching is even more demanding. In addition to managing
several dozen debaters and nine assistant coaches (grad
students in the communication studies department), and
traveling to 18 tournaments a year, Harris also teaches two
classes each semester.
Yet he feels more excited about debate today than ever, he
says, ``because of the quality of students we've had here at
Kansas. I really feel like I've been spoiled. We've had
really good people. I don't know what it is about Kansas.
Maybe it's something in the water that produces kids of high
character.''
Also, he gets a lot of help from the administration and
alumni. Support for debate has always been strong. It helps,
for instance, that the chair of the communication studies
department is not only a former KU debater but also a
national champion: Professor Robert Rowland, c'77, PhD'83,
won the NDT in 1976 with teammate Frank Cross, c'77. But
support strengthened in 2001, when Chancellor Robert E.
Hemenway formed the KU Debate Advisory Committee, a group of
faculty and alumni that raises funds for the program and
builds community across generations of KU debaters.
Mark Gidley, c'83, c'83, who serves on the committee and
helped win Kansas' last national championship, in 1983, says
the effort has benefited the program and alumni. ``We've had
a number of reunions,'' he says. ``It's been amazing to make
connections between debaters from the '40s and '50s and the
'80s and '90s and to see that we all had the same
experiences.''