Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2093) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to beach monitoring, and for other purposes, as amended. Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members…
Mr. Speaker, I move to suspend the rules and pass the bill (H.R. 2093) to amend the Federal Water Pollution Control Act relating to beach monitoring, and for other purposes, as amended.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days within which to revise and extend their remarks and to include extraneous material on
I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Mr. Speaker, the Clean Coastal Environment and Public Health Act of 2009 increases the authorization of appropriations for the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act, more commonly known as the BEACH Act bill, through 2014.
First signed into law in October 2000, the BEACH Act provides funding to States, to local governments and to tribes for the creation of coastal water assessment and for public notification programs that monitor our recreational waters.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2093, the Clean Coastal Environment and Public Health Act of 2009, increases the authorization of appropriations for the Beaches Environmental Assessment and Coastal Health Act, more commonly known as the BEACH Act, through 2014.
First signed into law in October 2000, the BEACH Act provides funding to states, local governments, and tribes for the creation of coastal water assessment and public notification programs that monitor our recreational waters.
Over the past nine years, my Subcommittee, the Subcommittee on Water Resources and Environment, has held hearings on reauthorization of the BEACH Act and has received recommendations for statutory changes that would strengthen State coastal water quality monitoring and public notification programs.
I applaud the sponsor of this legislation, Mr. Pallone, and our colleagues on the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Mr. Bishop and Mr. Hall, for introducing this important legislation.
H.R. 2093, the Clean Coastal Environment and Public Health Act, will increase the annual authorization for State and local monitoring and notification programs to $40 million annually.
In addition, this legislation expands the eligible uses for grants under this program to better understand ongoing sources of contamination to the nation's beaches.
For example, H.R. 2093 allows States to utilize a portion of their BEACH grant funding to develop and implement pollution source identification and tracking programs for coastal recreation waters.
These programs will enable interested States to locate the likely sources of coastal water contamination.
This information will be critical to states to demonstrate ongoing sources of pollution to the nation's beaches.
With definitive information on the causes of coastal water contamination, States can take appropriate action to eliminate these ongoing sources, and ensure that the nation's coastal areas are safe for swimming and other recreational activities.
Mr. Speaker, last Congress, the House considered similar legislation to reauthorize and strengthen the BEACH Act.
That version, H.R. 2537, was approved by the House on a voice vote in April 2008.
Unfortunately, the 110th Congress adjourned before further consideration could be taken on that bill.
H.R. 2093 is modeled on the bill that passed the House in the last Congress.
However, one significant change is the adoption of a statutory deadline for the development of rapid testing methods for measuring the quality of coastal recreation waters.
The development of a rapid testing method will provide a significant safeguard against swimming-related illnesses by ensuring that the public is notified of potentially harmful waters within a few hours, rather than days, as under the current system.
H.R. 2093 adopts a statutory deadline of October 15, 2012 for the development of rapid testing methods, and requires states to implement such methods within one year of their validation by EPA.
This provision should enhance the protection of public health, and hopefully prevent families from coming into contact with harmful pollutants at their favorite beaches.
The bill also defines the term ``rapid testing method'' to mean ``a method of testing the water quality of a coastal recreation water for which results are available as soon as practicable and not more than 6 hours after the commencement of the rapid testing method in the laboratory.''
Mr. Speaker, as made clear in the Committee Report to accompany this legislation, the intent of this definition is to compress the time period for testing water quality to provide real-time information on the condition of coastal recreation waters.
The Committee received information on testing technologies that are currently available which can produce accurate results in two to three hours.
The intent of this legislation is to require that EPA validate a rapid testing methodology that can achieve accurate results as quickly as possible within the confines of existing technologies.
In addition, H.R. 2093 requires the administrator to periodically review the state of water quality testing technologies, and to validate new rapid testing methods that can shorten the time necessary to produce results on the condition of such waters, with a goal of 2-hour testing by 2017.
Mr. Speaker, H.R. 2093 also enhances existing public notification requirements, including making beach warnings and closures available on the Internet.
The bill also clarifies that the public must be notified within 2 hours after the appropriate State or local authority receives the results of a coastal water quality sample.
However, because many States utilize a system where two contaminated samples must be identified before a beach is closed, H.R. 2093 requires that beach closures or advisories must be made within 2 hours of the receipt of any water quality sample that exceeds public health limits, and that a warning sign be posted immediately, thereafter.
Again, precaution against potential public health impacts needs to be the focus of this program.
Finally, the bill requires EPA to conduct annual compliance reviews of state and local BEACH programs.
I strongly urge my colleagues to support this legislation that will make significant improvements to EPA's BEACH program.
Much of our efforts are to provide additional safeguards for our families to ensure they do not come into contact with potentially harmful pollutants and contaminants along the nation's coastlines.
I believe that this legislation accomplishes what we have tried to do.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield such time as he may consume to the full committee chairman, Mr. Oberstar.
I reserve the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Pallone).
Mr. Speaker, I now yield 1 minute to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Bishop).
Mr. Speaker, I applaud the sponsor of this legislation, Mr. Pallone, and our colleagues on the Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure, Mr. Bishop and Mr. Hall, for introducing this important legislation. Further, I appreciate and respect the fact that Mr. Oberstar, Mr. Mica and Mr. Boozman helped with this as well, so I urge its adoption.
I yield back the balance of my time.