Mr. Speaker, I was pleased to learn that this past Wednesday, two Sikhs named Ajaib Singh Bagri and Ripudaman Singh Malik, who were accused of carrying out the 1985 Air India bombing, were acquitted. These Sikhs were found innocent because…
Mr. Speaker, I was pleased to learn that this past Wednesday, two Sikhs named Ajaib Singh Bagri and Ripudaman Singh Malik, who were accused of carrying out the 1985 Air India bombing, were acquitted. These Sikhs were found innocent because the witnesses against them were not believable.
The Indian government has maintained for 20 years that the Sikhs were responsible for the Air India disaster and has used it as an excuse to kill Sikhs and tighten the repression against them. Now it is clear that they were not responsible.
Why did India grant a loan of $2 million to the main financial backer of the organization that carried out the bombing? Why did Indian operatives approach Lal Singh, offering him ``2 million dollars and settlement in a nice country'' if he would offer false testimony against the two accused Sikhs? Why did the Consul General of India in Toronto call in a detailed description of the disaster just hours later when it took the Canadian investigators weeks to find that information? How did he know so much? Why was the Consul General later expelled?
His successor as Consul General was quoted as saying that Sikhs who support Khalistan, the independent Sikh homeland, are terrorists, but the movement for Sikh independence is led by the Council of Khalistan, which is committed to achieving an independent Khalistan by peaceful, democratic, nonviolent means.
The book Soft Target, which is the definitive account of the Air India case, quotes a Canadian Security Investigative Service investigator as saying, ``If you really want to clear the incidents quickly, take vans down to the Indian High Commission and the consulates in Toronto and Vancouver, load up everybody and take them down for questioning. We know it and they know it that they are involved.'' And the acquittal of the Sikhs accused just provides further substantiation of India's guilt.
Mr. Speaker, this country must not support terrorism. We cannot support the people who bombed the Air India airliner and killed 329 innocent people, especially at a time when we are fighting terrorism around the world. It is time to cut off all our aid and trade with India and support freedom and self-determination for all the nations struggling for their independence in South Asia. That is the best way to establish peace, freedom, security, and dignity for all in that troubled region of the world.
I would like to insert the press release on the acquittal of these two Sikhs from the Council of Khalistan into the Record, Mr. Speaker. I believe it will clearly show who is responsible for this terrible act of terrorism.
Malik, BagrI Acquitted of All Charges in Air India Case
justice has been done despite pressure from indian regime
Washington, DC, March 16, 2005. Ripudaman Singh Malik and
Ajaib Singh Bagri have been acquitted of all charges in the
Air India bombing case, in a major rebuke to the Indian
regime. Malik and Bagri were found not guilty today in the
deaths of 329 people who perished when Air India Flight 182
was brought down by a bomb on June 23, 1985 in Canada's worst
case of mass murder. Justice Ian Josephson delivered the
verdicts this afternoon, saying he didn't believe many of the
witnesses.
``Justice has been done for these Sikhs,'' said Dr. Gurmit
Singh Aulakh, President of the Council of Khalistan, which
leads the Sikh struggle for independence. ``Despite the
effort of the Indian government to blame these Sikhs for its
own acts, they have been found innocent. This is a major
setback for the Hindustani regime,'' he said. Canadian Member
of Parliament wrote in 1989 that the Canadian government had
spent $60 million on the case. ``On behalf of over 600,000
Sikhs in Canada and the 25 million Sikhs worldwide, we would
like to express our gratitude to Judge Josephson for doing
the right thing and not caving in to the pressure of the
Indian government,'' Dr. Aulakh said.
Air India flight 182 was blown up off Ireland in 1985. It
was on its way from Toronto to Bombay. It was supposed to be
blown up at the London airport when no passengers would be
aboard, but due to delays it blew up over Ireland. The book
Soft Target by Canadian journalists Zuhair Kashmeri of the
Toronto Globe and Mail and Brian McAndrew of the Toronto Star
exposed India's responsibility for this bombing. In the book,
Kashmeri and McAndrew quoted a Canadian Security
Investigative Service (CSIS) investigator as saying, ``If you
really want to clear the incidents quickly, take vans down to
the Indian High Commission and the consulates in Toronto and
Vancouver, load up everybody and take them down for
questioning. We know it and they know it that they are
involved.''
The book shows that within hours after the flight was blown
up, the Indian Consul General in Toronto, Surinder Malik (no
relation to Ripudaman Singh Malik), called in a detailed
description of the bombing and the names of those he said
were involved, information that the Canadian government
didn't discover until weeks later. Mr. Malik said to look on
the passenger manifest for the name ``L. Singh.'' This would
turn out to be Lal Singh, who told the press that he was
offered ``two million dollars and settlement in a nice
country'' by the Indian regime to give false testimony in the
case.
In his book Betrayal: The Spy Canada Abandoned, Member of
Parliament David Kilgour wrote that Canadian-Polish double
agent Ryszard Paszkowski was approached to join a plot to
carry out a second bombing. The people who approached
Paszkowski were connected to the Indian government.
The main backer of the group that was supposedly behind the
Air India bombing had received a $2 million loan from the
State Bank of India just before the plane was attacked,
according to Soft Target. The year after the bombing, three
Indian consuls general were asked to leave the country. At
the time of the bombing, the Congress Party needed the Sikhs
as scapegoats to win votes on a law-and-order platform. The
attack also served as justification for the government to
shed more Sikh blood.
The Indian government has murdered over 250,000 Sikhs since
1984, more than 300,000 Christians since 1948, over 90,000
Muslims in Kashmir since 1988, and tens of thousands of
Tamils, Assamese,
Manipuris, Dalits, Bodos, and others. The Indian Supreme
Court called the Indian government's murders of Sikhs ``worse
than a genocide.'' According to a report by the Movement
Against State Repression (MASR), 52,268 Sikhs and tens of
thousands of other minorities are being held as political
prisoners in India without charge or trial. Some have been in
illegal custody since 1984! We demand the immediate release
of all these political prisoners.
The Sikh Nation declared its independence from India on
October 7, 1987 and formed the Council of Khalistan at that
time to lead the struggle for independence. When India became
independent, Sikhs were equal partners in the transfer of
power and were to receive their own state, but the weak and
ignorant Sikh leaders of the time were tricked into staying
with India on the promise that they would have ``the glow of
freedom'' and no law affecting the Sikhs would pass without
their consent. Sikhs ruled an independent and sovereign
Punjab from 1710 to 1716 and again from 1765 to 1849 and were
recognized by most of the countries of the world at that
time. Sikhs do not accept the Indian constitution. No Sikh
representative has ever signed it.
V.P. Singh, who was the Indian Consul General in Toronto
when Soft Target came out, was quoted in the June 22, 1989
issue of the Washington Times, as saying that Sikhs who
support Khalistan are terrorists. The Council of Khalistan,
which leads the Sikh struggle to liberate Khalistan, openly
repudiated militancy and has an 18-year record of working to
free Khalistan by peaceful, democratic, nonviolent means.
Indian police arrested human-rights activist Jaswant Singh
Khalra after he exposed their policy of mass cremation of
Sikhs, in which over 50,000 Sikhs have been arrested,
tortured, and murdered, then their bodies were declared
unidentified and secretly cremated. Khalra was murdered in
police custody. His body was not given to his family. No one
has been brought to justice for the kidnapping and murder of
Jaswant Singh Khalra. The police never released the body of
former Jathedar of the Akal Takht Gurdev Singh Kaunke after
SSP Swaran Singh Ghotna murdered him. He has never been tried
for the Jathedar Kaunke murder. In 1994, the U.S. State
Department reported that the Indian government had paid over
41,000 cash bounties for killing Sikhs.
Missionary Graham Staines was murdered along with his two
sons, ages 8 and 10, by a mob of militant, fundamentalist
Hindu nationalists who set fire to the jeep, surrounded it,
and chanted ``Victory to Hannuman,'' a Hindu god. None of the
people involved has been tried. The persons who have murdered
priests, raped nuns, and burned Christian churches have not
been charged or tried. The murderers of 2,000 to 5,000
Muslims in Gujarat have never been brought to trial. An
Indian newspaper reported that the police were ordered not to
get involved in that massacre, a frightening parallel to the
Delhi massacre of Sikhs in 1984.
India is not one country; it is a polyglot thrown together
for the convenience of the British colonialists. It is doomed
to break up as they did. Last year, the Punjab Legislative
Assembly passed a bill cancelling the government's daylight
robbery of Punjab river water. The Assembly explicitly stated
the sovereignty of Punjab.
``The Indian regime stands exposed for the bloody tyranny
that it is,'' said Dr. Aulakh. ``This verdict is a major
setback to their repressive drive for hegemony over all of
South Asia,'' he said. ``This is a victory not only for the
Sikh Nation, but for freedom-loving people everywhere.''
``I urge the international community to help us free
Khalistan from Indian occupation,'' Dr. Aulakh said.
``Freedom is the birthright of all people and nations,'' he
said. ``As Professor Darshan Singh, a former Jathedar of the
Akal Takht, said, `lf a Sikh is not for Khalistan, he is not
a Sikh','' Dr. Aulakh noted. ``We must continue to press for
freedom,'' he said. ``Without political power, religions
cannot flourish and nations perish. A sovereign Khalistan is
essential for the survival of the Sikh religion and the Sikh
Nation.''