I thank my colleague from the State of New York, my neighbor just slightly to the east, and rise today to discuss from several new perspectives why it is, frankly, so critically important that we get energy legislation correct as we move…
I thank my colleague from the State of New York, my neighbor just slightly to the east, and rise today to discuss from several new perspectives why it is, frankly, so critically important that we get energy legislation correct as we move boldly into the 21st century.
Just a short election season ago, this Nation was assaulted with a message from one side of the aisle that rang like a motto. It repeated itself over and over and over again on the floor of this House and, frankly, in the living room of every American family, often intrusively during dinner hour, where we heard, Drill here, drill now, pay less. How empty today those words ring. In fact, after the price of crude oil has tumbled from its height of almost $140 a barrel, bottoming to somewhere near the low thirties without the new drilling of a single well, we ask ourselves the question, how empty that slogan was.
And so we rise as we build a new national energy policy, one based on thoughtfulness, one based on science, one based on economic reality and not on sloganeering. So while I ran to become a Member of this House, motivated by such things as health care and an economic recovery, I have now become a very, very aggressive individual on this issue, looking at the absolute need to get this right. The first step I took as I approached my job was to go to the only hydrogen fuel cell propulsion research and development system and center in the United States, located in Upstate New York in Honeoye Falls, where to my astonishment as an engineer lifelong and a graduate of an engineering school, I saw the application of science. They took us not into science fiction but into science reality there in Honeoye Falls, working tirelessly for the last several decades, having taken engineering work that had been done out west 25 years ago and propelled us from the NASA Apollo program into the reality of some 116 reality-based automobiles. I had the opportunity to drive one of them, actually two, from Honeoye Falls all the way here to report for my first day. This was like driving an Apollo spacecraft. My eyes were opened to the fact that we were on the verge of a great industrial revolution, and we are at this moment leading the world. But if we listen to sloganeering, if we listen to the naysayers, if we allow the argument to be shaped by narrow special interests, we will never, ever cross the threshold of economic and industrial greatness that these and other technologies put in front of us. It's not just the fact that we have to get it right because we need to rebuild an economy
based on 21st century jobs, it's not just the fact that we believe as a caucus and myself personally that our impact on this world, through the burning of fossil fuels, is actually changing our climate, but it is also coming from the fact that I am a 24-year military veteran who realizes the vast and dramatic expenses that we are committing in our military just to secure an ever-increasing and yet rarely obtainable source of overseas fossil fuel.
Imagine, if you will, if we were not held hostage to the noose of Middle East oil. Imagine the trillions of dollars of resources that we would not be expending in the protection of, the extraction of and the transportation of oil sources from the very nations who use the money that we pay to feed our enemies and their hostile intent against us. This must be broken, and nowhere is that future clearer than right in Upstate New York. I know that my colleague, with his career in innovative engineering where he took his leadership to the New York State Energy Development Agency that has pioneered so much of the technology we need to move forward, agrees and understands with what we can do together standing as a Nation instead of listening to well- crafted and, frankly, crafty sloganeering.
So I rise with my colleague today to put an exclamation point at the very end of the reality that we must move ahead to get this right. I agree with the President's vision for a future. I agree with our caucuses that we need to move boldly into the future with an economically viable, science-based, thoughtful energy plan that breaks this ridiculous stranglehold that foreign oil has on us. It's not just a matter of drill here, drill now, pay less. We have grown beyond that sloganeering.
Would my colleague yield on that point?
I would like to pick up a very critical point my colleague just made about jobs. Around Lake Seneca, that great deep and beautiful Finger Lake in Upstate New York, every year we run something called the Green Grand Prix. I'm sure you would love to be a participant in it. It is a road race, or a road rally, where navigation is important. I must confess that more than once I made a wrong turn. But I made a wrong turn in a vehicle this year, as I did last year, powered not by imported, foreign, distilled gasoline but rather by alternative fuels. We had ethanol-powered vehicles. We had steam-powered vehicles. We had solar-powered vehicles, hydrogen-powered cars. And this year I drove a Ford F-150 modified at a dealership in Elmira, New York, once a bustling hub of heavy manufacturing, to accept a dealer-approved kit that allowed this heavy truck to be powered by propane with some 350 miles per filling at one-third of the cost of gasoline. This was a technology that was unbeknownst to me, one that Ford Motor Company, in engineering innovation, has now authorized several dealerships around the United States to install without even voiding their basic engine warranties.
We have an abundance of propane in rural New York. This is an alternative fuel that helps us break the cycle of dependence on foreign oil, and for pennies on the dollar, for a mere tax break, to those who invest in this technology, it becomes competitive and real. And not only do those automobiles, those trucks, then get sold, but the individuals who modify those trucks have jobs. The dealerships that sell these vehicles to the public have jobs. The individuals who use them have extra money in their back pocket because they are not paying these overseas foreign fuel providers.
It is not just hydrogen or propane. It is the entire menu of alternative fuels and alternative electrical capability that we need to put on the table. And I will tell you what, if we can spend $700 billion, a move, by the way, I opposed, bailing out banks who don't put a penny of that back in the consumer's pocket through alternative credit sources, we can certainly fund the single most important national security requirement we have before this Nation today. And that is to get an energy policy that is science-based and thoughtful.
Thank you, Mr. Tonko. And I have to tell you, you used two turns of a phrase that I thought were particularly appropriate. You talked about energy flowing. We come from a part of the world that pioneered cheap electricity. And we did it through one of the largest and one of the first great hydropower facilities in the world, capturing the hydro energy of Niagara Falls. And western New York, the great industrial cities of Buffalo, Rochester and Syracuse benefited thereby. This was 100 years ago. Now we must look 100 years into the future. And you are right to say we need to think ``outside the barrel'' because unfortunately what we will hear in the coming debate is the demonization of the individuals making the argument and not the thoughtful discussion of the policy. I fear that we will become, once again, held hostage to the economic and energy sloganeering that will make it so difficult for the American people to understand that doing nothing is moving backwards, that doing nothing is surrendering without a new idea to the forces of Big Oil who so clearly ripped off from the American public trillions of dollars just this time last year as gasoline shot up to over $4 a gallon
with no real economic excuse other than gross corporate profiteering.
We cannot continue to be held hostage by the annual cycle of unexplained gasoline price increases and gasoline price fluctuations. And the only way that we are going to reclaim our own energy future is by looking beyond the slogans of the other side in a thoughtful, science-based, economically proven capability to explore all the new sources of alternative energies, not just for automotive propulsion, but also for fundamental electrical generation.
So thank you to my colleague from New York for allowing me the opportunity tonight to raise some key issues that this issue is not only about energy. It is about national security. It is not only about energy. It is about job creation for the future. It is not only about energy. It is about using the resources that we have to ourselves in the great American innovative manner that has always persevered in the face of challenge instead of surrendering to the foreign economies who, like they have been doing so aggressively lately, are taking over economic sector after economic sector. This is a battle that we can win. This is one that we can put ``Made in America'' on for future generations. And we can start right here, right now, tonight, by committing ourselves to thoughtful debate that raises issues and not sloganeering.
I yield back and thank my colleague for the opportunity to join him in this great discussion.