Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume. I rise in strong support of H.R. 5013, which is known as the IMPROVE Acquisition Act of 2010. For many years we've witnessed waste in the Department of Defense's acquisition system…
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
I rise in strong support of H.R. 5013, which is known as the IMPROVE Acquisition Act of 2010. For many years we've witnessed waste in the Department of Defense's acquisition system spiral out of control, placing a heavy burden both on the American taxpayers as well as our men and women in uniform. Less frequently, but still far too often, fraud and abuse have crept into the system, as sadly it happened recently in Iraq. Our troops rely on the acquisition system to buy the equipment they need to keep them safe on the battlefield as well as to protect our country. And when that system breaks down, they suffer.
In recent years, I and many of my colleagues on the Armed Services Committee have become increasingly concerned that this flawed defense acquisition system was not responsive enough to today's mission needs, not rigorous enough in protecting the tax dollars of millions of families who are struggling financially, and not disciplined enough in the acquisition of weapons systems for tomorrow's wars.
We took action. Mr. Chairman, last year we worked with the Senate to enact legislation to reform weapons system acquisition, which covers about 20 percent of all of the military acquisitions. However, weapon systems make up only a small piece of our defense. That bill was a great launching pad; however, we need to do more.
In the House, we continued the effort by creating a Panel on Defense Acquisition Reform, ably led by Congressmen Rob Andrews and Mike Conaway to carry out a comprehensive review of the current system and to identify what steps we need to take to make this system work. The panel could not have done a better job scrutinizing the defense acquisition system. It deals with everything from paper clips to boots to food, everything under the acquisition umbrella.
During the course of this past year, this panel held 14 hearings plus two briefings on a broad range of issues dealing with the acquisition system, unearthing everything from contract fraud to simple process errors that led to billions of wasted dollars. They put together an excellent report with suggestions to fix the system. And we are here today, with the good will of the House, to pass legislation that will enact those recommendations as outlined in the panel headed by Mr. Andrews and Mr. Conaway.
This act will overhaul the defense acquisition system in many respects. Basically, however, requiring the department to set clear objectives for the defense acquisition system and manage performance in achieving those objectives; requiring the department to introduce real accountability into the requirements process, and create a requirements process for the acquisition of services; strengthening and revitalizing the acquisition workforce; requiring the department to develop meaningful consequences for success or failure in financial management; and strengthening the industrial base to enhance competition and gain access to more innovative technology.
In other words, the legislation before us today would require the Department of Defense to adopt the basic management practices that are necessary for anything as complex as the acquisitions system to function properly. These changes will make sure that the men and women who are risking their lives to protect our country are getting
the proper equipment they need to do their jobs and to protect themselves, and that they get it sooner. Additionally, we expect this bill to prevent the waste of billions of taxpayer dollars over the next 5 years.
This is a bipartisan bill. I am very proud of that fact. It passed our Armed Services Committee by a vote of 56-0. A great deal of credit goes to Mr. Rob Andrews and Mr. Mike Conaway. And a special thanks to my partner, Buck McKeon, the ranking member, the gentleman from California.
I urge my colleagues to join us in sending the strongest possible message to the men and women in uniform, as well as to the American people, that we are serious about protecting the taxpayers' dollars and making the acquisition system work more smoothly. It's really for them as well as for our country.
Committee on Ways and Means,
U.S. House of Representatives,
Washington, DC, April 21, 2010.
Hon. Ike Skelton,
Chairman, Committee on Armed Services,
Washington, DC.
Dear Chairman Skelton: Thank you for working with the
Committee on Ways and Means (``Committee'') on H.R. 5013, the
``Implementing Management for Performance and Related Reforms
to Obtain Value in Every Acquisition Act of 2010.'' As you
know, section 403 of H.R. 5013 is of jurisdictional interest
to the Committee as it would require tax return information
to be supplied by the Internal Revenue Service (``IRS'').
Generally, tax return information is confidential. However,
Section 6103(c) of the Internal Revenue Code permits the
Secretary of the Treasury to disclose the tax return
information of a taxpayer to such person as the taxpayer
designates. The Committee continues to monitor the expanding
IRS workload and remains concerned about programs that
greatly increase the agency's workload outside of its core
mission. In calendar year 2009, the IRS made nearly 11,000
tax disclosures under section 6103(c). It is unknown how many
additional disclosures will be made under H.R. 5013. As such,
the Committee worked with the Armed Services Committee to
develop a provision that is administrable by the IRS. The
Committee remains committed to ensuring that any additional
responsibilities imposed on the IRS do not strain agency
resources and welcomes the opportunity to re-evaluate this
provision in the future.
As we have discussed, this exchange of letters will be
placed in the Committee Report on H.R. 5013 and inserted in
the Congressional Record as part of the consideration of this
legislation in the House. Thank you for the cooperative
spirit in which you have worked with the Committee regarding
this matter.
Sincerely,
Sander M. Levin,
Chairman.
Mr. Chairman, at this time let me pay tribute to members of our committee. Buck McKeon, the ranking member, a gentleman of the first order, is helping so very, very much to achieve end results in a bipartisan manner. National security is an American challenge. It is not a Democrat or a Republican challenge but one that is bipartisan. And I certainly appreciate his efforts.
Rob Andrews, Mike Conaway, and all those on the panel, the bipartisan panel, which made the recommendations for this legislation did so unanimously. We had a full hearing, debating the issues that arise in this bill, and it was passed out to this floor with a vote of 56-0. So I want to say a special thanks to the members of the Armed Services Committee, all the members, and especially the gentleman from California (Mr. McKeon) for his untiring efforts in this regard.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to my friend and my colleague, who is also the chairwoman of the Subcommittee on Military Personnel, the gentlewoman from California (Mrs. Davis).
Mr. Chairman, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
Let me point out that this acquisition legislation is based upon a complicated set of facts. You just don't go down to the local store and buy the necessary equipment for the young men and young women in uniform. Many of the issues deal with the production, with the purchase, with the right sizing, and all of the intricacies and technologies of today's high-level type of efforts.
So to explain all of this in much greater detail is the gentleman who is the key sponsor of this legislation, the gentleman who chaired the panel, and I compliment him on the excellent job that he and Mr. Conaway and the other members of the panel did. So I yield at this time 5 minutes to my friend, the sponsor, the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews).
(Mr. ANDREWS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
I yield the gentleman an additional 5 minutes.
No. I appreciate the gentleman from New Jersey. I have nothing further to add, except that hopefully this bill will receive a unanimous vote at a later moment.
Mr. Chairman, I have an amendment at the desk.
Mr. Chairman, the amendment before us is one that is technical in nature. It merely seeks to clarify certain technical errors and inconsistencies that arose during the process of drafting the bill. It conforms the bill to the intent of the Armed Services Committee in its markup. It makes no substantive changes, is noncontroversial, and I would certainly hope that we could adopt the amendment.
At this time, Mr. Chairman, I yield 2 minutes to the gentleman from New York (Mr. Arcuri).
Will the gentleman yield?
The gentleman is correct. The Armed Services Committee has under consideration a number of requests from Members of the House related to the impacts of current law regarding titanium and other specialty metals on the industrial base. We will consider these requests when we mark up the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 2011.
I look forward to working with Mr. Arcuri, Mr. Shuler, and Mr. Davis on the issue in the coming weeks so that these important concerns are addressed. I thank the gentleman for his efforts on this bill, H.R. 5013, and for agreeing to assist the committee in putting together our authorization bill.
Mr. Chairman, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from North Carolina (Mr. Etheridge).
(Mr. ETHERIDGE asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
Mr. Chairman, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Chairman, I rise in opposition to the amendment, but I do not oppose it.
The amendment before us is a sense of Congress amendment. In essence it says, we should follow the law. It reaffirms Congress' support for the Buy American Act and other United States labor laws, and Congress has acted in recent years to make contracting officers aware of firms seeking contracts that have engaged in certain violations of the law. This is a ``wake up and pay attention to the law'' sense of Congress.
Today, Mr. Chairman, we have done more than adopt 16 amendments and had an excellent general debate on this bill. We have exhibited in a very substantial and substantive piece of legislation that Democrats and Republicans can work together, that, in a bipartisan effort, we can make things better for the young men and women in uniform, that we can save the taxpayer dollars, and over a period of time, it will be in the billions of dollars if this legislation becomes law. And we certainly hope that it will not only pass here with a substantial vote but also pass the United States Senate with a substantial vote, because it is a hallmark piece of real legislation. It should have been done before, but it wasn't. And here we are, taking up legislation that will be good for the young men and young women in uniform and save the American taxpayer dollars.
I am really proud of the committee. I am really proud of Buck McKeon, the ranking member, for his excellent cooperation and work; Rob Andrews, the chairman of the panel that I appointed; Mike Conaway, for the excellent work that he did, in particular, the sections relating to the required audits that will be part of this legislation. We have just done marvelous work. I could not be prouder of the Armed Services Committee and those who worked on it as well as those who offered the very important amendments.
With that, Mr. Chairman, I am very grateful for the work that has been done, and I do urge a ``yes'' vote on this particular amendment.
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I object.
Mr. Speaker, I claim time in opposition, though I do not oppose the motion.
I yield to the gentleman from New Jersey (Mr. Andrews).
(Mr. ANDREWS asked and was given permission to revise and extend his remarks.)
I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, pursuant to the instructions of the House in the motion to recommit, I report the bill, H.R. 5013, back to the House with an amendment.
Mr. Speaker, I demand a recorded vote.