Mr. Chair, I thank my friend from Pennsylvania for yielding, and I thank him for his leadership on this very important issue. Mr. Chairman, it would be hard to find a district that has been more of a petri dish for the experiments of the…
Mr. Chair, I thank my friend from Pennsylvania for yielding, and I thank him for his leadership on this very important issue.
Mr. Chairman, it would be hard to find a district that has been more of a petri dish for the experiments of the Office of Renewable Energy Programs at BOEM than mine. I live it every single day.
Before I go on and talk about this, just from the heart, the projects that are coming up--fortunately, one of them, Orsted, some of you may have heard of it, has now left--have received billions of dollars of funding from the State and Federal Government. They, themselves, admit it would reduce our tourism industry, but they minimized it. The company itself said it would reduce it by approximately $1.1 billion only. It would kill our fishing industry.
It would really create very serious situations in our national defense and our national security. It would increase utility rates, again, according to the company itself, so it is probably much worse than the amount I previously stated; two to three to four times as much as we currently pay. It is a plan that would rely upon foreign countries to supply our energy. How stupid is that.
It has been a painful process. Thank God we won the first step when this huge, multinational, Danish company decided they couldn't take it anymore. We had a movement in south Jersey at our shore. Our shore counts. We have a beautiful, clean, pristine environment. It was an organic movement. It was the people. We had rallies. I myself produced 5,000 signs saying: Stop wind turbines. Renew and keep our beautiful shore.
This is from the heart. This was a bad plan that would industrialize the areas that they are focused upon and would cost a great deal of money.
Mr. Chair, it would be hard to find a district that has been more of a petri dish for the experiments of the Office of Renewable Energy at BOEM than mine.
In South Jersey, the industrialization of our shorelines at the hands of foreign offshore wind companies has been a top priority for BOEM and the Biden Administration.
Lies, lack of accurate information, and poor community engagement were rampant as offshore wind companies and their friends in the federal government tried to force these projects forward.
Well, I am happy to say that as of this week, much of the South Jersey coastline has been liberated from this threat.
But the Office of Renewable Energy's goals are clear: they want to force this President's Green New Deal agenda forward by any means necessary.
So, in a time of exceedingly high fuel prices and inflation, it is unconscionable to continue to send tens of millions of taxpayer dollars to an office whose priorities will only exacerbate these problems.
We must direct our resources towards tangible priorities, not partisan ideologies.
I hope all of my colleagues will join us in voting for this amendment.