Federal Employees Paid Parental Leave Act Of 2008
Mr. Speaker, I offer a motion to recommit. In its present form, I am. Mr. Speaker, I offer this motion to recommit with instructions. This motion to recommit is simple and straightforward, one of these important issues that I think we can…
Mr. Speaker, I offer a motion to recommit.
In its present form, I am.
Mr. Speaker, I offer this motion to recommit with instructions.
This motion to recommit is simple and straightforward, one of these important issues that I think we can all agree on, and, frankly, an issue I would have brought as an amendment in committee if I had thought about the idea then. It says that people who are not compliant with their court-ordered child support arrangements, deadbeat dads, are not eligible for the expanded Federal benefits included in the bill.
This motion sends a clear message to the American people that we have respect for their hard-earned tax dollars they send to Washington, DC. The underlying bill, however, sends a far different message about the priorities of the majority party in Congress.
Think about it: American families are paying more than $4 a gallon for gasoline, but are we acting to bring more energy to this country? America faces unprecedented terrorist threats from abroad, but are we renewing legislation to help better secure the homeland? Are we addressing out-of-control Federal spending? Are we acting to better secure our borders? We are approaching a $10 trillion national debt, a problem that threatens our Nation's economic future, but are we cutting spending or reforming the out-of-control earmark process?
Here is what Congress is doing, Mr. Speaker. Congress is spending its time and energy on H.R. 5781, a bill to give Federal bureaucrats, including deadbeat dads, a new handout, a vast expansion to the already generous benefits package they receive at the expense of
the American taxpayer, at the expense of every single American family. That is our priority? That is our answer to $4 gasoline, expanding benefits to Washington bureaucrats and deadbeat dads?
I ask you, Mr. Speaker, what will you tell the folks about back home? What will you tell the folks who are worried about the economy, worried about higher taxes on the horizon, worried about paying more than $4 a gallon for gasoline for the rest of the summer? Will you tell them not to worry, that their problems belong on the back burner? That the priority of their Member of Congress is to take their tax dollars and expand the benefits package of deadbeat dads in the Federal workplace? Will you tell them that these deadbeat dads, who already receive among the richest benefit packages in the Nation, are more deserving of relief than law-abiding families and taxpayers of your district who are paying $4 a gallon for gasoline?
Mr. Speaker, like most issues, the people get it. The American people know what the priorities of Congress should be. Millions of them have signed petitions and communicated to our offices that we need to focus on their priorities. They know our priorities should not be giving deadbeat dads a new taxpayer-funded benefit. They know we should adopt this motion to recommit and move on with the important business facing our Nation.
Mr. Speaker, there is another old line that I think is appropriate. ``Most politicians don't see the light; they feel the heat.'' With $4 gasoline, possibly headed for $5 this summer, can you handle the heat you will feel back home once your constituents find out that your priority is to lend a hand to deadbeat dads, or will you see the light and join me in supporting this motion to recommit?
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, on that I demand the yeas and nays.