Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Ethics, I offer a privileged resolution and ask for its immediate consideration. Mr. Speaker, I yield an equal amount of time in this debate to a lady with whom I am honored to serve, the…
Mr. Speaker, by direction of the Committee on Ethics, I offer a privileged resolution and ask for its immediate consideration.
Mr. Speaker, I yield an equal amount of time in this debate to a lady with whom I am honored to serve, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Sanchez), the ranking member of the Committee on Ethics, for purposes of debate only, and I ask unanimous consent that she be permitted to control that time.
Mr. Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume.
As chairman of the Committee on Ethics, I rise in support of a resolution before us today which calls for a reprimand for Representative Laura Richardson of California.
Article I of the Constitution gives Congress the responsibility for punishing Members of our body for disorderly behavior. And in the House, it is the Committee on Ethics, the only evenly divided committee, made up of five Democrats and five Republicans, and served by a completely nonpartisan, professional staff, that has been entrusted with the responsibility to enforce the rules of the House and recommend actions such as that before us today, when a Member or staff acts in a manner that violates the spirit of public trust.
The obligation, therefore, falls to this committee to review those allegations that a Member has violated ethical standards that the American people expect and deserve from those of us who are privileged enough to work for them, men and women who wear the title of Representative of this great Nation.
This unfortunate story begins in October of 2010 when the committee, during the 111th Congress, first began to receive complaints from several members of Representative Richardson's staff, both in the Washington, D.C., and Long Beach, California, offices, that Representative Richardson required her staff to perform campaign work.
The committee began an initial inquiry based on these complaints, as well as from media reports consistent with those complaints.
On November 3, 2011, the committee, now in the 112th Congress, empanelled an investigative subcommittee and appointed Representative Charles Dent of Pennsylvania and Representative John Yarmuth of Kentucky to lead this bipartisan subcommittee in reviewing the allegations against Representative Richardson. Joining Mr. Dent and Mr. Yarmuth were two Members pulled from a pool of Members who assist the committee when needed. In this case, they are Representative Rob Bishop of Utah and Representative Ben Ray Lujan of New Mexico.
These four Members, two Democrats and two Republicans, served on the investigative subcommittee and, over the past 9 months, led an extensive investigation, supported by the committee's dedicated, nonpartisan, professional staff, delving deep into this matter.
In a minute, Mr. Dent, who served as chairman of the investigative subcommittee, will detail the volume of work that the investigative team undertook during this period.
Ultimately, the subcommittee unanimously agreed to a Statement of Alleged Violation against Representative Richardson.
Mr. Speaker, while the full committee report, the investigative subcommittee report, Representative Richardson's responsive views, and all exhibits were filed by the ranking member and me yesterday morning, and have been available to the House and to the American people since that time, here now, in summary, are the seven counts of violation:
First, Representative Richardson violated the Purpose Law, title 31, section 1301, United States Code, by using official resources of the House for campaign, political, personal, and other nonofficial purposes.
Second, Representative Richardson violated House rule XXIII by retaining a full-time employee in her district office who did not perform duties commensurate with their compensation.
Third, Representative Richardson violated House rule XXIII by behaving in a manner that did not reflect credibly upon this House when she unlawfully used House resources for nonofficial purposes.
Fourth, Representative Richardson violated House rule XXIII by behaving in a manner that did not reflect credibly upon the House when she improperly compelled members of her official staff to do campaign work by threatening, attempting to intimidate, directing or otherwise pressuring them to do such work.
Fifth, Representative Richardson violated House rule XXIII by behaving in a manner that did not reflect credibly upon the House when she obstructed and attempted to obstruct the investigation of this committee into these allegations.
Sixth, Representative Richardson violated clause 2 of the Code of Ethics for Government Service by failing to uphold the laws and legal regulations discussed above and being a party to their evasion.
Seventh, Representative Richardson violated House rule XXIII by failing to abide by the letter and spirit of House and committee rules.
The record should note that anytime a Member is confronted with a Statement of Alleged Violation, he or she has the option of challenging those allegations with a public hearing of an adjudicatory subcommittee or, in the case of Representative Richardson, negotiating a resolution with the investigative subcommittee.
In this instance, Representative Richardson negotiated a resolution in which she admitted to all seven counts in the Statement of Alleged Violation and has waived her rights to any additional process in this matter, including waiving her right to an adjudicatory hearing. Representative Richardson has also agreed to accept a reprimand by the House as well as a $10,000 fine to be paid out of personal funds to the U.S. Treasury no later than December 1, 2012.
In the history of our country, five Members have been expelled from Congress; 23 Members have been censured; and eight Members have been reprimanded. Representative Richardson negotiated--and we recommend-- the sanction of reprimand.
The investigative subcommittee unanimously adopted a report recommending a resolution including these terms to the full committee, and on July 31, 2012, the full committee adopted the recommendations of the subcommittee.
Mr. Speaker, at this time, I am pleased to reserve the balance of my time so the distinguished ranking member of the Ethics Committee, the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Linda T. Sanchez), may make any comments she may have.
Mr. Speaker, I am now pleased to yield such time as he may consume to the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Dent), who ably served as chairman of the investigative subcommittee, for any comments he may have.
Mr. Speaker, I am prepared to close unless there are any further requests for time.
Mr. Speaker, I am happy, on the part of the committee, to yield 5 minutes to Representative Richardson.
Mr. Speaker, I would inquire of the gentlelady from California how much additional time does she intend to seek because, as I have heard her comments, respectfully, it sounds like those were all contained in her response which was included in the report submitted to the House.
So I would ask, how much additional time would you be seeking to conclude your comments?
Mr. Speaker, I will yield the gentlelady 5 additional minutes.
Mr. Speaker, I'm prepared to close if the ranking member has no further speakers.
Mr. Speaker, in closing, I want to once again thank members of the committee, as well as members of the pool, for their tremendous service that they render to this institution. And on behalf of the entire House, I want to again thank the nonpartisan, professional committee staff for their extraordinary hard work and commitment to the House of Representatives and to the American people that we all serve.
As it is often noted on the floor, especially during somber moments like this, public office is a public trust. And for the vast majority of Members who have been honored with the opportunity, the privilege to serve in this, the people's House, there is an unspoken duty to hold ourselves up to a higher standard.
Unfortunately, as Representative Richardson has admitted, she did not live up to that higher standard. And as such, she did a disservice to her staff, to her colleagues. And while it is ultimately up to her constituents in California to be the final judge of her actions, I think it is safe to say she did a disservice to the hardworking taxpayers from all corners of this country who expect and deserve more from their elected leaders.
Throughout the course of this matter, the investigative subcommittee heard desperate, sometimes emotional pleas for help from members of Representative Richardson's staff. Representative Dent has shared at least one of the stories with the body today. And even since word first broke yesterday of this resolution this morning, the committee has received calls from other staffers thanking us for bringing this matter to a public resolution.
As a former Hill staffer myself, I have great respect for those staffers who were willing to come to the Ethics Committee with their stories and heartfelt concerns. That is not an easy thing to do against a Member of Congress, particularly when that person claims to be your boss and you're made to feel that your job is in jeopardy. At the end of the day, however, we must remember and never forget that the real employer for us all are the American people.
I was particularly moved by one of Representative Richardson's former staffers who testified:
This certainly should not be an example as to the way an
elected official for this country should conduct themselves
under any circumstance.
And, Mr. Speaker, I am simply haunted by the statement of another staffer that Mr. Dent referenced, a lady who was part of the Wounded Warrior program, someone who was willing to risk her life in service to her country, and ended up coming home a disabled veteran. She told the committee, and it bears repeating:
It is sad to say that I would rather be at war in
Afghanistan than work under people who are morally corrupt.
Mr. Speaker, while some might prefer a harsher sentence, perhaps a few might even think a reprimand is too severe, I urge my colleagues to support the unanimous recommendation of the only evenly divided committee in this House of Representatives.
And with that, I yield back the balance of my time.
Mr. Speaker, I ask unanimous consent that all Members may have 5 legislative days in which to revise and extend their remarks and include extraneous material on H. Res. 755.