Mr. Speaker, I enter into the Record the story of a 17- year-old Guatemalan boy who received asylum because a gang killed his father and they were threatening him. Cesar, a 17-year old boy from Guatemala, lost his father to gang violence…
Mr. Speaker, I enter into the Record the story of a 17- year-old Guatemalan boy who received asylum because a gang killed his father and they were threatening him.
Cesar, a 17-year old boy from Guatemala, lost his father to
gang violence at the age of 4. For 13 years, Cesar was
harassed by the same gang who killed his father. When he
refused to join the gang, he feared for his life and fled the
country, swimming across the Rio Grande to cross the border.
He was granted asylum, loves school and hopes to attend
college.
Cesar--Asylum
Cesar, from Guatemala, was four years old when his father
was killed by gangs in their community. The gang members were
never arrested and continued to live in the town. They
started harassing Cesar when he was very young and never
stopped. He was very scared but there was no way he could get
away from them.
By the time he turned 17, Cesar could not stand the gang
harassment any more. The gangs were trying very hard to get
him to join and he was very afraid he was going to be killed.
He decided to make the journey to the United States. He said
was very hard; sometimes he didn't think he would survive. He
swam across the Rio Grande to cross the border. A pro bono
attorney KIND matched him with from Kirkland & Ellis helped
him gain asylum. He loves school and wants to attend college.
I thank the gentleman from Colorado.
Mr. Speaker, I wish I could say this bill were a joke. This is far worse than a joke. Not only does the underlying bill fail to provide adequate funding to deal with the situation at hand, it flat out ignores the root cause of the problem.
By tacking on a vote on the so-called ``No New DREAMERS Act,'' House leadership is not just refusing to take action on immigration reform, it is prohibiting the President from doing things to fix a broken system. This is akin to watching a train crash or knowing that it is going to crash and stoking the furnace more, making the damage greater. They have no interest in fixing this crisis. They have no interest in fixing the problem. They are playing politics with people's lives, and they are playing politics with our Nation's economy.
This isn't a game. These are human beings. This is doing damage to our country. If we are truly committed to tackling this crisis on the southwest border and to ensuring a fair and efficient process for dealing with these kids, we need to begin with comprehensive immigration reform.
If the previous question is defeated, we will offer H.R. 15, the House bipartisan comprehensive immigration bill. Only by fixing our broken immigration system can we begin to better allocate the resources where they are needed most.
My bill provides a path forward for people already here so that their cases are no longer clogging our immigration courts and so that immigration officials can spend their time going after those who wish to do our Nation harm. It will provide green cards for thousands of Hondurans and El Salvadorans who have languished for over a decade under temporary status, and it adds the necessary due process protection for children on the border.
A speaker on the side opposite brought up the issue of what caused this. What was the straw that broke the camel's back? I will tell you what the straw is. Some of these children have waited 5 years; some of them have waited 8 years; and some of them have waited over a decade on the promises of this Congress--and there is blame to go to both sides-- to have comprehensive immigration reform. Then the Speaker who had promised earlier in the year to work with the President finally announced there would be no comprehensive immigration reform. That was the straw that broke the camel's back because 55 percent of these children are coming to be with their families.
Mr. Speaker, our country needs comprehensive immigration reform, and the American people support comprehensive immigration reform. There are enough votes in this House to pass comprehensive immigration reform.
I ask my colleagues to vote against the previous question so that we can finally consider comprehensive immigration reform.