Mr. Speaker, I offer a motion to recommit. In its current form, I am. Thank you, Mr. Speaker. I rise to offer this motion to recommit to strengthen the bill before us, H.R. 2857, and the national service laws to ensure that we are all…
Mr. Speaker, I offer a motion to recommit.
In its current form, I am.
Thank you, Mr. Speaker.
I rise to offer this motion to recommit to strengthen the bill before us, H.R. 2857, and the national service laws to ensure that we are all doing what we can to protect those individuals being served by these programs and by the Federal investment in national service.
Sparked by a 2005 Inspector General report that found rampant, and I recognize and emphasize that word ``rampant,'' noncompliance with individual grant provisions requiring background checks, the Corporation for National Community Service recently completed a rulemaking process to institute background checks for any individuals seeking a federally funded national service position within the Senior Companion and the Foster Grandparent program and from the
AmeriCorps positions in which individuals have access to a vulnerable population.
The regs also prohibited individuals from serving in these positions if they were registered sex offenders.
Mr. Speaker, I applaud the administration for taking these steps to protect vulnerable populations being served by the national service programs. But I believe that we should go further and provide more protection.
First, this motion to recommit would codify the corporation's regulations, ensuring that these protections are not subject to the whims of future administrations. Despite current efforts, program audits conducted by the Office of the Inspector General have detected a disturbing pattern of noncompliance with criminal background check provision requirements. In some cases, programs have failed to conduct checks.
Just as disturbing, however, other programs have failed to retain the documentation providing this background check information that was conducted for members working with youth and other vulnerable persons.
Second, this motion to recommit would expand on the corporation's efforts by including, and I emphasize that, including all federally funded national service provision positions, not just those within the foster grandparents and senior competitive programs or just those AmeriCorps programs dealing with specific populations.
Finally, Mr. Speaker, in addition to prohibiting registered sex offenders from serving in these positions, this motion to recommit would include those individuals convicted of murder as well.
Mr. Speaker, our message is clear with this motion to recommit: if you are a program receiving assistance under these national service laws and are accepting participants to serve in federally funded programs and positions within your program, we expect you to screen those potential participants to ensure that they are not, and I emphasize again, not registered sex offenders or convicted murderers. And if you wish to serve in federally funded national service positions, some of which include as their reward an education award that exceeds that which is received by low-income students through the form of a Pell Grant, you are not welcome if you have committed these crimes.
Mr. Speaker, some people would ask, Why do we include these crimes? We believe that these crimes are so egregious that they demand Federal action. But also we hope that by requiring criminal history background checks, programs will have increased information with which they can exercise good judgment. It only seems to make sense. To repeat myself, we also hope that by requiring criminal background checks, programs will have the increased information from which they can exercise good judgment in deciding who deserves the rewards that come with federally funded national service positions.
Mr. Speaker, I urge my colleagues to support this motion to recommit, which would provide the Education and Labor Committee further time to deliberate on this important topic. This motion expresses a loud and clear message that the House of Representatives believes that those in need who are served by programs supported with assistance under these laws should be assured that they will not be placed in harm's way when approaching these programs for help.
Mr. Speaker, I yield back the balance of my time.
If the gentleman will yield, that is one aspect of the motion. It goes farther than that.
Mr. Speaker, I recently sat and listened to the debate on the prior attempt to bring a motion to recommit on a significant issue, that being the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. If the gentleman would amend his unanimous consent request to include that so we might have a vote, I would be happy to.
Mr. Speaker, will the gentleman yield?
Mr. Speaker, it is my understanding that the appropriations for these particular programs don't expire for another several months.