Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded. Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to waive the mandatory quorum call with respect to the motion to proceed to Calendar No. 300, S. 3627. Mr.…
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent that the order for the quorum call be rescinded.
Mr. President, I ask unanimous consent to waive the mandatory quorum call with respect to the motion to proceed to Calendar No. 300, S. 3627.
Mr. President, before I begin, I want to take a moment to talk about the situation in Minnesota.
The death of Alex Pretti was a tragedy, and there should be a full and impartial investigation into the shooting. I am glad that the President is sending Tom Homan to Minnesota, and I hope that his arrival will help restore order to the situation.
I also hope that recent tragedies have inspired some soul-searching among those who have participated in or encouraged abuse toward ICE officers and other law enforcement officers. It is deeply disturbing that we have had public officials essentially encouraging harassment of officers simply trying to do their duty.
Appropriations
Mr. President, funding for a substantial portion of the government runs out this week. We are on the clock to pass the remaining fiscal year 2026 appropriations bills. Productive talks are ongoing, and I urge my Democrat colleagues to continue their engagement and find a path forward that will avoid a needless shutdown and not jeopardize full funding for key Agencies like FEMA and the Coast Guard. We need to fund these and other essential Agencies and finish our 2026 appropriations work now.
March for Life
Mr. President, on Friday, tens of thousands of individuals filled the streets of DC and marched up to the Capitol Building. They came from every background and from every corner of the country--high school students, college students, church groups, individuals, families-- united by one mission: to testify to the truth that every human being, no matter how small or vulnerable, is of infinite value, created in the image and likeness of God, and endowed by the Creator with certain inalienable rights--chief among them, the right to life.
Abortion statistics are grim--roughly a million babies being killed by abortion every year. So many lives lost. So much love lost. But the March for Life is an occasion for hope. It is a powerful reminder that life has many defenders and that in every place in this country, there are men and women and young people standing up for moms and new babies.
Of course, the March for Life, as big and important as it is, is just one small facet of the pro-life movement, which works every day to offer help and hope to moms in need. In 2024, for example, pregnancy resource centers around the country provided more than $452 million in total medical care, support and education services, and material goods to moms and their families.
Here in Congress, it is vital that we do our part to support moms and protect babies. I am very proud that with the Working Families Tax Cut, Congress enacted the first pro-life law in decades. Thanks to Republicans' landmark legislation, this year, some of the Nation's largest abortion providers, including Planned Parenthood, are prohibited from receiving Federal Medicaid funding. Organizations that have turned the killing of babies into a business are cut off.
Later this afternoon, we will be taking up legislation to ensure that pregnant college students are aware of and able to access the support they need to carry their babies and parent while continuing their education.
The Pregnant Students' Rights Act, introduced by Senator Ashley Moody, requires colleges and universities to ensure that all students are informed of the protections and accommodations available to them should they become pregnant--such as modified class schedules, excused absences, physical accommodations, and more. No student should ever have to feel that she needs to choose between keeping her baby or completing her education.
The legislation will help ensure pregnant college students are aware that support is available to them in their local communities and on their campuses, both while they are pregnant and after giving birth.
I would like to think that this bill would get 100 votes here in the U.S. Senate. The pro-abortion movement and the Democrat Party have long claimed to be for choice. Well, what better way to ensure that women actually have a choice than by making sure that they are aware of the resources available to them. This bill does nothing to restrict abortion. It doesn't even mention abortion. It simply ensures that women know about the support and accommodations available to them and that they have information about how to file a title IX complaint should they face discrimination.
This bill should have unanimous support. Yet we fully expect that, by and large, the Democrat Party will oppose this legislation. That is right. The Democrat Party will vote against legislation designed to do nothing more than inform women of the resources available to them and of their rights under title IX.
Why? Well, that is a good question.
Why does the Democrat Party oppose making sure women are informed about the support available to them? For that matter, why has the Democrat Party opposed legislation to ensure that babies born alive during an abortion are protected or why did they remove safety requirements around chemical abortions--requirements designed to ensure that at least the mother, if not the baby, was protected?
Well, it is because they are afraid. They are afraid, if they support even the tiniest, most commonsense measure to ensure safety around abortion or protect babies or even just ensure pregnant college students know of the resources available to them, that they will somehow, inadvertently, point to the truth that they are so desperate to hide--the fact that an unborn child is just as much a human being as you or I because, after all, Democrats are fighting an uphill battle.
We know science. We have ultrasounds. We know very, very well that that unborn child waving her hands or sucking her thumb on the sonogram screen is a human being, and every one of us knows, at the core of our being, that human beings deserve to be protected. Abortion requires us to suppress our natural instincts. It requires us to close our eyes, stick our fingers in our ears, and pretend that the human being we see on the ultrasound, moving her fingers and kicking her feet, is nothing more than a clump of cells that we can sacrifice at will.
So I understand the Democrats are scared, and they should be scared because, when it comes to abortion, they have built their house upon sand, and sooner or later, that sand will crumble. Sooner or later, the truth will win. Life will win.
I want to thank everyone who marched for life here in DC on Friday, and I unite my work and my prayers to theirs in that the day may soon come when every baby born and unborn is guaranteed the right to life and the full protection of our laws.
I yield the floor.
I suggest the absence of a quorum.
Mr. President, I send a cloture motion to the desk.
The cloture motion having been presented under rule XXII, the Chair directs the clerk to read the motion.