Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume and rise today in strong opposition to H.R. 4502, a package of seven fiscal year 2022 appropriations bills that will be considered this week. I wish the circumstances were different…
Madam Speaker, I yield myself such time as I may consume and rise today in strong opposition to H.R. 4502, a package of seven fiscal year 2022 appropriations bills that will be considered this week.
I wish the circumstances were different and I could support this important piece of legislation that funds critical programs. Unfortunately, after months of committee hearings and markups, this year's bills have too many fatal flaws.
First, there is no agreement between Republicans and Democrats on the top-line spending level for appropriations.
Second, there is no bipartisan agreement on the funding level for each individual bill. To put it simply, nondefense spending is too high and defense spending is too low.
Third, our colleagues on the other side of the aisle have included the most alarming policy changes I have ever seen.
While acknowledging the hard work of Chair DeLauro and her subcommittee chairs, this package does not reflect the type of bipartisan agreement that we must have to complete the appropriations process this year. Instead of crafting legislation both sides of the aisle can support, the bills included in the package were written to address the most extreme views in the majority party.
At a time of record-high deficits and debt, now is not the time to double down on increasing domestic spending.
Here are just a few examples of the excess spending included in this package: a 36 percent increase for the Labor-HHS bill; a 39 percent increase for the White House; and a 22 percent increase for the Vice President's office.
All of this comes at a time when we are seeing inflation rise at the fastest pace in 13 years. For the sake of generations to come, we can't afford to spend like this.
In addition to these unrealistic spending levels, the majority has made questionable policy decisions that will complicate any attempts to come to a bipartisan agreement. For example, their funding priorities will reverse the gains in energy independence that we have made over the past decade and will actually increase our dependence on China for critical minerals.
Another area that is particularly concerning is that this bill fails to include longstanding language prohibiting the transfer of detainees currently at Guantanamo Bay to the United States. These detainees are the worst of the worst, and we need assurance that they will not be moved to our soil.
Finally, the most startling position taken in this bill is the deliberate removal of the Hyde amendment and other longstanding bipartisan provisions to protect life. The bill also provides funds for the largest Planned Parenthood affiliate in the country, which performs thousands of abortions each year.
This is not the way to do business if we want to enact full-year appropriations bills this year. With the House only planning to be in session and voting for 12 more legislative days before the end of the fiscal year, we have a lot of work to do and little time to do it. We must develop top-line spending levels that both sides can support.
We have countless policy differences that will take time to resolve, and protecting the lives of unborn children must be the first step.
If we want to avoid a long-term continuing resolution--or worse, a government shutdown--we must get serious and do the work our constituents sent us here to do.
Madam Speaker, I urge my colleagues to vote against this package, and I reserve the balance of my time.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Idaho (Mr. Simpson), who is the ranking member of the Energy and Water Development, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Arkansas (Mr. Womack), who is the ranking member of the Financial Services and General Government Subcommittee.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Oklahoma (Mr. Cole), the vice ranking member of the full Committee on Appropriations, and the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Labor, Health and Human Services, Education, and Related Agencies.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Texas (Mr. Carter), the ranking member of the Subcommittee on Military Construction, Veterans Affairs, and Related Agencies.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Florida (Mr. Diaz-Balart), the ranking member of the Transportation and Housing and Urban Development, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Nebraska (Mr. Fortenberry), the ranking member of the Agriculture, Rural Development, Food and Drug Administration, and Related Agencies Subcommittee.
Madam Speaker, I yield 3 minutes to the gentleman from Ohio (Mr. Joyce), the ranking member of the Interior and Environment Subcommittee.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Virginia (Mr. Cline), who is a member of the Appropriations Committee.
Madam Speaker, I yield 1 minute to the gentleman from Alaska (Mr. Young), the dean of the House of Representatives.
Madam Speaker, I yield an additional 30 seconds to the gentleman from Alaska.
Madam Speaker, I yield myself the balance of my time for closing.
Madam Speaker, the bills we are considering today have some fatal flaws I simply cannot support. Again, there is no agreement on top-line spending levels, and the bills include some of the most concerning policy changes I have ever seen in an appropriations bill.
The package before us includes excessive spending, jeopardizes our security, reverses the provisions that protect life, and adds burdensome regulations. Moving this package is simply a wasted opportunity.
This is a partisan measure. I strongly urge my colleagues to vote ``no,'' and I yield back the balance of my time.