Iraq Principles
Mr. Speaker, I am so glad that we have this hour to be able to let Americans know the things they need to know about their government. I think it is important since the gentleman from Virginia just finished talking about what this effort…
Mr. Speaker, I am so glad that we have this hour to be able to let Americans know the things they need to know about their government. I think it is important since the gentleman from Virginia just finished talking about what this effort and what I call mismanagement has cost the American people and that it will cost the American people. We need to make sure that we understand that we are deficit spending. This is not surplus money. This is deficit spending money. It is like for some of us Americans that are receiving these credit cards through the mail saying that all you have to do is sign the back and call this 1-800 number, you are automatically qualified for $2,000 and you go out and you spend that $2,000 at a rate of like 23 percent interest rate. That is the kind of deficit spending that we have right now. We need to continue to have a dialogue on this.
I am very disturbed by some of the things that I am hearing out of this White House and out of the majority party as it relates to the efforts in Iraq. At the top of the week, we had the majority leader of this House on the Republican side saying that he is upset that the White House has not said more and the Defense Department has not said more about the accomplishments in Iraq. I would beg to differ. Yes, there have been some accomplishments in Iraq, but I would beg to differ by the fact that we have troops that do not even have armor in Iraq. I serve on the Committee on Armed Services. We authorize billions, $480 something billion annually to the Department of Defense. I remember asking some of the individuals in the Department of Defense, Secretary Wolfowitz to be exact, do our troops have adequate body armor? I was told, yes, the front line troops will have adequate body armor. Right now we have troops that are at Walter Reed Hospital and at Bethesda Hospital with wounds that went through the body armor, bullets that went through the body armor that were supposed to protect them.
I think it is also important for us to understand that if this Congress does not start asking the hard questions to this White House and to the Department of Defense we are going to continue to have these special appropriations. We just gave $78 billion 6 months ago. We are giving $87 plus billion very soon and it will be more to come. When I say that this is going on, this is just not a convenience issue, this is hurting Leave No Child Behind in education, this is hurting social services. I have seen people brought to the table and called out for mismanagement for far less than the billions of dollars that have been mishandled in this war as it relates to contract services. I think it is important that we have to ask the tough questions. I am so glad that the media and some Members of this Congress have called Vice President Cheney out on the fact that the connection he claimed in the Sunday show this past Sunday, saying that Saddam Hussein had something to do with 9/11. I am glad to hear that the President said that is not true today at a press conference before I came on the floor. The reason why that was corrected in a 3-day period or in a 4-day period is that this Congress questioned that. Democrats questioned what the Vice President said. That is why it is important that we have a democracy. That is why it is important no matter what party you are in if you are a Member of this Congress that you must speak out on issues that you know when that information is inaccurate. Intelligence in the past has been stated about chemical weapons, things of that nature. It has been several months now since we have been in Iraq and there are very little chemical weapons to show for our efforts. We have to ask the hard questions on what is the real rebuilding plan for Iraq. We have yet to see that. Our minority leader the gentlewoman from California (Ms. Pelosi), the gentleman from Pennsylvania (Mr. Murtha), who is ranking member on the Committee on Appropriations, asked for that yesterday. As of right now, the last I checked, we still have not received it. That is the reason why we have to continue to push for these questions so that it is not a rubber stamp.
The reason why this administration went to the U.N. before they took their preemptive strike or before we took our preemptive strike on Iraq is because the American people said that they wanted them to go to the U.N. Even though they went to the U.N. and we danced and we changed the name of French fries here in the Capitol to freedom fries and did all of these peripheral things, we still went in by ourselves and now we are paying the price. We are now having to go back and say, oh, we like the French. Oh, we feel that Germany and others, we feel that you are good people. We need your help.
If we do not replace diplomacy on the executive branch, then we are in for a costly, costly, long stay in Iraq. It is no longer good enough, Mr. President, for you to say, we're going to be in Iraq as long as we have to be in Iraq. That is not an appropriate answer. An appropriate answer is saying, we are having real negotiations with the Security Council at the U.N., that I am instructing the Secretary of State that we are going to do everything in our power to continue to get more troops in our coalition. You may ask and there are, give or take, 115,000, 125,000 U.S. troops right now on the soil in Iraq. Some 13,000 coalition forces. But last night I saw Secretary Rumsfeld said, oh, we have 60,000 Iraqi police officers that are a part of our security force now. We have to make sure that we are clear. We cannot use metaphors. We cannot allow the Department of Defense nor this White House nor the leadership of this Congress to wiggle out of the tough questions.
I am just as patriotic as the next person. And just because we ask the question of this government that every last
one of us have been voted on to be here to represent our constituents, individuals should not be called out. General Shinseki had to resign because he said this war would cost anywhere from $120 billion to $130 billion. Others who have said of an accurate account if we went into this thing by ourselves of what it would cost had to resign. We in this Congress are the only individuals who cannot be fired. We only can be fired by the people, by the American people, and not by an executive action.
So I ask you, and I implore, and I am so glad that the Congressional Black Caucus has taken this stand to be the conscience of this Congress once again. It may not be the appropriate thing in the light of those individuals who consider themselves self-appointed patriots on behalf of our men and women in uniform, but it was this caucus, Democratic Caucus, that are fighting for those individuals who make under $26,000 to be able to receive a child tax credit, including those individuals that are over there fighting, their children. Republicans said no and are still saying no and say that the bill will not come up. We are saying that we are willing to put the facts and figures here.
I almost feel like a member of the other party who always talked about deficit spending, or used to talk about it. We no longer talk about it now because it is not important. I think it is important that we continue to raise the tough questions, that we continue to be able to ask for an accounting as it relates to private contracts that are being let. This peripheral, this information that is generic about maintenance and reconstruction and turning on the power and making sure they have water and schools, without defining it, can no longer be accepted by this Congress. So it is important that we focus on the fine details. I am so glad that we are here.